I know you believe you’re an expert on everything but there are very few black and white issues in the law. A 1948 case set during WWII is a lot different than the current situationwhere there is no declared war. Whether the judge was right or wrong will be determined by a higher court, as if should be. Not by you or a reporter who don't understand the issues.
Slam dunk. This is exactly why the ruling of the lower court judge is both unconstitutional and fraudulent. It ignored all case law before it. The fact that he made the ruling official should be grounds for removal because he has demonstrated his inability to 1. Remain impartial and 2. Follow the law, as his position mandates, and 3. Recuse himself from cases where he or his sphere of influence has a conflict of interest.
He's not there to interpret the law. He's there as a mediator to ensure a fair trial and that the law is followed and NOT IGNORED. Judges are not interpreters that get to play gods and goddesses. The notion that they EVER WERE is not grounded in reason.
Your comment that the judge should act as a mediator shows you have no business commenting on this issue.