POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
I think Le Pen will win. If the French want to actually fix their country that is.
Precisely why Infowars is so bad - their headlines are ridiculous. From the article;
"It is unclear whether the refugees actually are former Taliban fighters. The authorities are still puzzling about the motives of the accused: some hope for a better ride if they spend themselves as a former Taliban. They may speculate that they will not be deported to Afghanistan, because membership of the Taliban will be punished with the death penalty."
The real question is whether or not the globalist learned their lesson from the American election? They may have put in better contingencies to ensure that Le Pen loses.
I'm not familiar with how French elections work, but they did get HRC 3 million more votes in November - they just underestimated how fed up the rust belt was with the situation. I'm assuming pop vote wins in France, they may be able to swing that one.
That's not infowars.
But yes, infowars sucks. I have only listened to Alex Jones one time out of curiosity, and saying hes a nutjob is being kind. Don't know how or why anybody reads it or listens to them, even annoys me that Drudge every now and then posts a link from them.
Good point - Watson is the editor at large of Infowars though. I consider them one in the same.
Obama is trying to help Macron win. Thats good news for Le Pen, bad news for Macron. Obama always picks the loser.
Yeah I know, I just saw someone retweet the article and just tweeted it here lol
Le Pen should have vocally embraced Trump instead of distancing herself from him, hope that doesn't come back to bite her in the ass.
Hey Matt Damon, your commercial is fake and the beer sucks ass. Kiss my ass.
She clearly assaulted him first. Case dismissed. GTFO of my courtroom, skank.She put herself in that position with her bad decision.
I guess it pays well being a socialist these days, 
.
.
NYT writes a post mortem piece on Comey's role in the election, but what they actually reveal is how partisan Lynch's DOJ was, and their efforts to bury the Hillary investigation.
The Times found that this go-it-alone strategy was shaped by his distrust of senior officials at the Justice Department, who he and other F.B.I. officials felt had provided Mrs. Clinton with political cover. The distrust extended to his boss, Loretta E. Lynch, the attorney general, who Mr. Comey believed had subtly helped play down the Clinton investigation.
His misgivings were only fueled by the discovery last year of a document written by a Democratic operative that seemed — at least in the eyes of Mr. Comey and his aides — to raise questions about her independence. In a bizarre example of how tangled the F.B.I. investigations had become, the document had been stolen by Russian hackers.
The Justice Department knew a criminal investigation was underway, but officials said they were being technically accurate about the nature of the referral. Some at the F.B.I. suspected that Democratic appointees were playing semantic games to help Mrs. Clinton, who immediately seized on the statement to play down the issue. “It is not a criminal investigation,” she said, incorrectly. “It's a security review."
As Mr. Comey prepared for his first public questions about the case at congressional hearings and press briefings, he went across the street to the Justice Department to meet with Ms. Lynch and her staff.
At the meeting, everyone agreed that Mr. Comey should not reveal details about the Clinton investigation. But Ms. Lynch told him to be even more circumspect: Do not even call it an investigation, she said, according to three people who attended the meeting. Call it a “matter.”
Mr. Comey and other F.B.I. officials regarded it as disingenuous in an investigation that was so widely known. And Mr. Comey was concerned that a Democratic attorney general was asking him to be misleading and line up his talking points with Mrs. Clinton’s campaign, according to people who spoke with him afterward.
As the meeting broke up, George Z. Toscas, a national security prosecutor, ribbed Mr. Comey. “I guess you’re the Federal Bureau of Matters now,” Mr. Toscas said, according to two people who were there.
A document obtained by the F.B.I. reinforced that idea.
The document, which has been described as both a memo and an email, was written by a Democratic operative who expressed confidence that Ms. Lynch would keep the Clinton investigation from going too far, according to several former officials familiar with the document.
The Times found that this go-it-alone strategy was shaped by his distrust of senior officials at the Justice Department, who he and other F.B.I. officials felt had provided Mrs. Clinton with political cover. The distrust extended to his boss, Loretta E. Lynch, the attorney general, who Mr. Comey believed had subtly helped play down the Clinton investigation.
His misgivings were only fueled by the discovery last year of a document written by a Democratic operative that seemed — at least in the eyes of Mr. Comey and his aides — to raise questions about her independence. In a bizarre example of how tangled the F.B.I. investigations had become, the document had been stolen by Russian hackers.
The Justice Department knew a criminal investigation was underway, but officials said they were being technically accurate about the nature of the referral. Some at the F.B.I. suspected that Democratic appointees were playing semantic games to help Mrs. Clinton, who immediately seized on the statement to play down the issue. “It is not a criminal investigation,” she said, incorrectly. “It's a security review."
As Mr. Comey prepared for his first public questions about the case at congressional hearings and press briefings, he went across the street to the Justice Department to meet with Ms. Lynch and her staff.
At the meeting, everyone agreed that Mr. Comey should not reveal details about the Clinton investigation. But Ms. Lynch told him to be even more circumspect: Do not even call it an investigation, she said, according to three people who attended the meeting. Call it a “matter.”
Mr. Comey and other F.B.I. officials regarded it as disingenuous in an investigation that was so widely known. And Mr. Comey was concerned that a Democratic attorney general was asking him to be misleading and line up his talking points with Mrs. Clinton’s campaign, according to people who spoke with him afterward.
As the meeting broke up, George Z. Toscas, a national security prosecutor, ribbed Mr. Comey. “I guess you’re the Federal Bureau of Matters now,” Mr. Toscas said, according to two people who were there.
A document obtained by the F.B.I. reinforced that idea.
The document, which has been described as both a memo and an email, was written by a Democratic operative who expressed confidence that Ms. Lynch would keep the Clinton investigation from going too far, according to several former officials familiar with the document.
I have a lot of theories about Comey, but the one I've settled on at the moment is this; his role was to "reopen" the investigation and then absolve her just before the election to give her a bump. Most likely internal polling had shown the Hillary camp that they were in some real trouble and they thought that they could stem the tide. Anyway, that's my current thinking.
I guess it pays well being a socialist these days,
Looks like he ain't paying his fair share
Muslim college professor in Indiana arrested for sending threatening anti-Muslim emails to himself and lying about being assaulted
Interesting the comey stuff is back around again. Saw nate silver tweeting about it earlier.
The left still searching for an excuse as to why they lost.
The left still searching for an excuse as to why they lost.
But the dumbass alt left will tell us that it was a witch hunt and she wasn't found guilty of anything.
Man, can you handle expungement. I know we talked about it a few years ago. Apparently new laws allow me to expunge now
Corsi is pretty good, was a bit surprised he went to infowars.
96% of Trump voters would vote for him again.
Media FAIL.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-trump-100-days-honeymoon-regrets-poll/story?id=46943338
Media FAIL.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-trump-100-days-honeymoon-regrets-poll/story?id=46943338
I think I read somewhere they offered him carte blanche for his own D.C. division.
I just emailed you. Had that old email from a few years ago
I reluctantly voted for Trump - least bad option. Now I wonder what was holding me back and am enthusiastic. His greatest asset is that no one can get a handle on him. Love how the media of all stripes are spinning their heads as if they have the god-given right to know what's coming. His ideas & choices have been the best I've seen in near 30 years. Those that are turned off his speech pattern are shallow. It's results not words that matter - the opposite of Obama.
He better build the damn wall, and he better not send troops to Syria. The NK situation sucks but something has to be done before Fatty jong dipshit has the capabilities to hit our allies or Hawaii in the Pacific. It would be wwaayy better if Trump could somehow force Chinas hand and get them to do it for us, give us their blessing, or help us deal with NK.
And he better not cuck on illegals...NO AMNESTY!
Well, illegals coming in is way down without wall. That's a start. Give him credit. Can't build wall w/o money from Congress. He's asked for it.
Don't see troops is Syria. I think he's making right moves with China on NK, don't u?
And regardless, who do you want for Prez if not Trump?
![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
Dumb arses.
I'm fine with Trump at the moment, and I'm not getting overly hysterical about the BS media narrative about Kushner v Bannon, neocon/dem takeover of the WH. As long as he keeps plugging along I'm content for the moment. I don't like the fact that he was apparently serious about backing the Ryan HC bill, it was atrocious, and for what just to get a legislative 'win' in his first 100 days? If he stays true to his nationalistic campaign rhetoric and America First promises I'll be tickled pink.
And if any of you mofo's vote for McConnell next time around I'll hunt you all down I swear to god.
![[winking]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/wink.r191677.gif "Winking [winking]")
(Only half kidding)
Democrat tells child that Trump is more dangerous than a terrorist
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/d...orist-report/article/2620990?custom_click=rss
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/d...orist-report/article/2620990?custom_click=rss
CO2 is increasing the growing zones and greening up the planet while not increasing the global temperatures as expected. Expect a narrative shift ie global warming to climate change in the not too distant future.
Yep. Whenever Trump is praised by cuckservatives like Graham, McCain, National Review, etc., it's almost guaranteed he's fuc*ing up...
I hope one day they find Graham with McCain's pecker up his rear and the scandal takes them both down. Or death, I'm not opposed to them dying at any moment.
I guess it pays well being a socialist these days,
Hahaha that mfer....
I kind of admire him trolling these dumbass millenials and olds.
