ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
I find it ironic that the diversity the liberal crave is ushering in an age of race based identity politics that will be tumultuous at best and down right hostile at worst.

No it won't because you see, all races will be broken down into two sub categories.

White men.

Everyone else.

In their utopia, this is how the masses will view identity.
 
Well I don't buy half of the bs. Oreilly wanted to bang hot fox chicks and used his power to gain that advantage. Someone alert the coast guard. We've got an average f'n guy here. For some reason, and hey I know the left is trying, we just can't stop men from doing everything they can to bang hot ass.

Some of those cases they settled to avoid the press and a court preceding. Doesn't mean anything really happened that would shock anyone. It's just cheaper to keep it away from a lawyer battle.

Megyn Kelly started this mess to promote herself and tried to bring down fox on her way out. She's a slug. And I'm sure she rode more than one horse to get to where she's at.

The "little woman victim" card is old, especially coming from Fox tramps who were willing to do whatever. My opinion.
The left has been caught at every turn doing the same thing but, it was only a cigar, children, and selfies of private parts. Nothing to see here folks because Russia hacked cigar sales, put kiddie porn virus on Hillary's server and, actually made Anthony's Wiener look much bigger than it was.
 
What are
She was ahead last I saw, I think it was by about 2%.

Yeah, I've seen that as well in the last half hour or so.

Globalists heads everywhere right now...

iu
 
  • Like
Reactions: screwduke1
I think this OReilly thing was more about removing people in the media who are fair to Trump. Lets be honest, we all know those left wing groups who went after OReilly don't give a damn if he did what he was accused of, it was about silencing someone who was fair to Trump.

You can bet that Tucker and Hannity (and some folks on talk radio) will be next. Only a matter of time before accusations are thrown at them too. This is nothing more than the left trying to silence opposition. Ironically, these people call themselves antifascist, what a laugh that is. They do not want anyone in the media to put Trump in a nice light. Very pathetic that Fox gave in to them, too.
 
I think this OReilly thing was more about removing people in the media who are fair to Trump. Lets be honest, we all know those left wing groups who went after OReilly don't give a damn if he did what he was accused of, it was about silencing someone who was fair to Trump.

You can bet that Tucker and Hannity (and some folks on talk radio) will be next. Only a matter of time before accusations are thrown at them too. This is nothing more than the left trying to silence opposition. Ironically, these people call themselves antifascist, what a laugh that is. They do not want anyone in the media to put Trump in a nice light. Very pathetic that Fox gave in to them, too.

I saw earlier that some lady has accused Hannity of inviting her up to his hotel room while they were on a business trip together. Tried and trusted I guess. :chairshot:
 
I think this OReilly thing was more about removing people in the media who are fair to Trump. Lets be honest, we all know those left wing groups who went after OReilly don't give a damn if he did what he was accused of, it was about silencing someone who was fair to Trump.

You can bet that Tucker and Hannity (and some folks on talk radio) will be next. Only a matter of time before accusations are thrown at them too. This is nothing more than the left trying to silence opposition. Ironically, these people call themselves antifascist, what a laugh that is. They do not want anyone in the media to put Trump in a nice light. Very pathetic that Fox gave in to them, too.

Rush is hitting this one on the head. Oreilly is going to explain in more detail who went after him, the reasons for the fallout from fox's standpoint, and what's to come. The whole situation with oreilly has been known for ever. He kills the left in the ratings and they've been after him for a while. Once Roger left Fox the shield was gone. Mrdock's heirs are liberals. Fox is headed down the tank and this is the beginning. They will go after Hannity next.

I know people like and enjoy Carlson, and I do too. But listen carefully to him. He concedes liberal propoganda all the time.

"I think that a fair point and maybe true"

He says it 10 times per show. And 90% of the time it's not a "fair point" and not "maybe true". Oreilly went after liberal think tanks and causes at the source, by name. Tucker goes after college professors and concedes points that are clearly out of bounds. He's the table setter for the moderate crap Fox is about to release.
 
Unfortunately, today's result in France was not nearly as good as it might appear to be on the surface. The problem is that the combined leftist vote (Macron falls into that category, notwithstanding laughable MSM propaganda about his "pragmatism" or "centrism") was 50% of the total vote. Almost ALL of those votes will go to Macron in the runoff- perhaps about 5% of the Far Left voters for Melanchion might vote for Le Pen because of the EU/economic issues. The right wing votes in total equaled 50% of the total vote, and half of those votes went to LePen. To keep pace with Macron in the runoff, she'll have to get almost ALL of the right wing votes that went to Fillon and the minor rightist candidates. Not happening- especially if it's true that Fillon endorsed Macron (if so, what a pathetic cuck!)

She'll lose but getting to a 40% of the total will be a huge wake up call, and will nicely set the stage for 2022.
 
Unfortunately, today's result in France was not nearly as good as it might appear to be on the surface. The problem is that the combined leftist vote (Macron falls into that category, notwithstanding laughable MSM propaganda about his "pragmatism" or "centrism") was 50% of the total vote. Almost ALL of those votes will go to Macron in the runoff- perhaps about 5% of the Far Left voters for Melanchion might vote for Le Pen because of the EU/economic issues. The right wing votes in total equaled 50% of the total vote, and half of those votes went to LePen. To keep pace with Macron in the runoff, she'll have to get almost ALL of the right wing votes that went to Fillon and the minor rightist candidates. Not happening- especially if it's true that Fillon endorsed Macron (if so, what a pathetic cuck!)

She'll lose but getting to a 40% of the total will be a huge wake up call, and will nicely set the stage for 2022.

The fact that a place as bat shit crazy and liberal as France could even come close to electing someone like LePen should give every American great pause. That's like Satan considering Jesus as his mentor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: screwduke1
Apparently the bankers got there hooks in one of the Mods.

[pfftt]

I've been having post deleted a good bit. Made a post about personal interactions with Sandy Bell and tbey were deleted. Guess those of us who've actually met her and don't bow to the company's line of how great she is will be silenced.

Hard to believe it but they do sensor this thread. But only if you're conservative. I've seen liberals use vile language talking about white conservatives but that's fine.
 
I've been having post deleted a good bit. Made a post about personal interactions with Sandy Bell and tbey were deleted. Guess those of us who've actually met her and don't bow to the company's line of how great she is will be silenced.

Hard to believe it but they do sensor this thread. But only if you're conservative. I've seen liberals use vile language talking about white conservatives but that's fine.

There was a reason I left this board for 4 years, I'm beginning to remember what that reason was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: morgousky
Rush is hitting this one on the head. Oreilly is going to explain in more detail who went after him, the reasons for the fallout from fox's standpoint, and what's to come. The whole situation with oreilly has been known for ever. He kills the left in the ratings and they've been after him for a while. Once Roger left Fox the shield was gone. Mrdock's heirs are liberals. Fox is headed down the tank and this is the beginning. They will go after Hannity next.

I know people like and enjoy Carlson, and I do too. But listen carefully to him. He concedes liberal propoganda all the time.

"I think that a fair point and maybe true"

He says it 10 times per show. And 90% of the time it's not a "fair point" and not "maybe true". Oreilly went after liberal think tanks and causes at the source, by name. Tucker goes after college professors and concedes points that are clearly out of bounds. He's the table setter for the moderate crap Fox is about to release.
Maybe the few conservatives Fox has, should make their own news network.
 
  • Like
Reactions: morgousky
Maybe the few conservatives Fox has, should make their own news network.

Corporate sponsors are pulling ads on semi conservatives as we speak. The attack on the media is real. Free speech is not protected. The use of algorithms on facebook, google, youtube, twitter, and etc. is censoring/suppressing conservative views while pushing liberal social engineering.

They came after Savage and kicked him out the UK with a travel ban. They went after Rush. They bought up Fox and took Roger and O'Reilly down. They are now after Alex Jones. The media is run by 6 companies with 96% of their campaign donations going to democrats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: screwduke1
He must not do as good a job as Jones does pushing his narrative, I've never heard that name before.
Its a chick. She blames Russia for literally anything and everything.

She could stub her toe and claim it was a Putin set up. Shes completely nuts, go read her twitter account sometime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnKBA
Mark Levin has the Conservative Review something or another network. It is a subscription service for $99 a year.

Steven Crowder
Michelle Maulkin
Dan Bongino
Mark all have shows. I haven't watched it but I listen to Levin and Bongino podcasts. They promote it on there. Dan Bongino's Renegade Republican podcast is pretty good. It is only 30 minutes and he breaks down economics to debunk liberal myths.
 
Mark Levin has the Conservative Review something or another network. It is a subscription service for $99 a year.

Steven Crowder
Michelle Maulkin
Dan Bongino
Mark all have shows. I haven't watched it but I listen to Levin and Bongino podcasts. They promote it on there. Dan Bongino's Renegade Republican podcast is pretty good. It is only 30 minutes and he breaks down economics to debunk liberal myths.
Bongino is really good. One of my favorites.
 
Well well I'll be listening to oreilly podcast and they're already claiming left wing Bots did the damage. He's going to slaughter that network and I can't wait.

The left use bots and paid trolls to project way more influence than they actually have. If advertisers would take a moment to realize that, they'd just ignore the sjw nonsense.

For some reason, the Hillary team did ZERO polling the month leading up to Election Day. None.

I don't believe that for a second. They cancelled the fireworks before election night. They knew they weren't getting the blowout everyone predicted; although I'm certain they didn't really think they'd lose.

They had to poll. Otherwise they would've kept that on
 
It could be true that she did no polling. She and her team very well may have bought into the BS media polls. Which could explain why she hardly touched the rust belt.
 
They missed the obvious trouble spots and gave the "blue wall" way too much credit.

A 3% lead in national polls was right in the danger zone for her to win the pop vote and lose the electoral college. She had almost no margin for error. Once it became clear that she was losing Florida and North Carolina the writing was on the wall. They invested time in red states rather than protecting their base. A better candidate probably would have gotten away with it, but not someone as flawed as HRC was.
 
MSNBC and Fox are the biggest offenders when it comes to partisan hacks. CNN is a little more subtle, although Lemon is pretty terrible.

Maddow and Hannity cancel each other out. Matthews and Carlson same thing.

What MSNBC doesn't have that Fox does is a Sheppard Smith - a guy who is the dead opposite of everyone else on the network.
 
MSNBC and Fox are the biggest offenders when it comes to partisan hacks. CNN is a little more subtle, although Lemon is pretty terrible.

Maddow and Hannity cancel each other out. Matthews and Carlson same thing.

What MSNBC doesn't have that Fox does is a Sheppard Smith - a guy who is the dead opposite of everyone else on the network.

Fair enough. I like Fox when it comes to politics. Believe they cover it fairly with the facts. I actually don't mind CNN when it's covering news other than political stuff. Like a natural disaster. But Don Lemon IMO is a dangerous POS problem that the CIA needs to lock up or make him disappear.

He's as anti American as it comes on a so called news Network.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT