Has to beat 50+% or it goes to runoff. In runoff it will be 1v1 and Dems have put a ton of effort in already, might've blown their wad.I don't understand how he loses? He is clearly winning in a landslide.
Seems pretty normal, happens a lot. Guess it prevents weird outcomes say if 1 Dem was running vs 4 Rs or visa versa, you could get a garbage outcome.Ok so 50.4% is only up .4%
Why is this the case? Seems odd
Don't quote me on this, but I think because it was a seat previously held by someone who was bumped up. No one lost the seat, the seat holder got a raise. In a special election such as this, a challenger has to win the majority (more than 50%) or the two top vote getters square off in a one on one election.Ok so 50.4% is only up .4%
Why is this the case? Seems odd
Has to beat 50+% or it goes to runoff. In runoff it will be 1v1 and Dems have put a ton of effort in already, might've blown their wad.
people went to the polls thinking clinton was under fbi investigation
she wasn't. trump was. and you MAGA scumbags are still f--king whining
people went to the polls thinking clinton was under fbi investigation
she wasn't. trump was. and you MAGA scumbags are still f--king whining
Wtf are you talking about. That b**ch was and still is under investigation. It's just for stuff a lot worse than emails.
Pay
For
Play
But that influenced no one's vote in the polls...it was that she was a shit candidate, that ran on no platform at all, and didn't even bother going to several states bc she was "owed" a presidency....i mean she had to rig her own party to beat an economically illiterate socialistpeople went to the polls thinking clinton was under fbi investigation
she wasn't. trump was. and you MAGA scumbags are still f--king whining
Well, in all fairness, Republicans begged for crumbs just a mere 7 years ago. Scott Brown delivered a badly needed US Senate seat formerly occupied by Ted "Where's My Bridge" Kennedy against Martha Coakley. It was an epic win. Dems hoping for the same.Funny searching twitter about the GA election. More people in CA care about it than GA.
According to Twitter, if Ossoff hits his 50+%, Trump and the GOP are done and impeachment will be going down.
So weird, they'll take any crumb right now. (Hillary almost took the district in the Pres election)
Experimenting with those designer hallucinogens again, are we?people went to the polls thinking clinton was under fbi investigation
she wasn't. trump was. and you MAGA scumbags are still f--king whining
Well that win allowed Rs to maintain a filibuster in the Senate. Not sure there would be anything of importance like that with the dem win in house.Well, in all fairness, Republicans begged for crumbs just a mere 7 years ago. Scott Brown delivered a badly needed US Senate seat formerly occupied by Ted "Where's My Bridge" Kennedy against Martha Coakley. It was an epic win. Dems hoping for the same.
Just catching up.
Clinton wasn't under investigation. Um, ok.
Fuzz reads and knows the Constitution. Doesn't let anyone tell him what it means. Um, ok. Hundreds of years of Supreme Court justices telling us what it means is all just bullshit I guess. Because, fuzz knows.
Subject line of congratulatory email that Adidas sent to this year's Boston Marathon finishers -- "Congratulations, you survived the Boston Marathon!"
The look on his face if PRICELESS...
![]()
Sen. Grassley (R-Iowa) says he expects a Supreme Ct. retirement this summer. Say hello to a conservative majority for at least the next decade.
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-acti...ther-supreme-court-vacancy-likely-this-summer
Prople would be ok with manadory Supreme Court Justice retirement if their party were in a majority. No if in the minority.
I'll believe it when I see it. Ginsburg is going to break the record or die trying.
Well that would eliminate Ginsburg for thinking Lindsey Graham was a women.I'd also be ok with mandatory bi annual mental competency testing after 70 to determine fitness for duty.