I'd rather see him golfing than raping children like democrats do
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
I'd rather see him golfing than raping children like democrats do
The quagmire lies in determining "acceptable" protected free speech vs. "unacceptable" unprotected free speech. Because the power to suppress opinion/dissent/foes lies with whoever gets to make that determination.
Which is why, if you try to take away my free speech, or make me "adapt" to your "beliefs," you bet your @ss "hostility" will be "warranted" against your groupthink feminazi freedom-of-speech-stripping claptraps.
Now shave your pits, put on a bra, shut your mouth and make me a sammich you nassssssty woman.
#freedomofspeechrules
Even though they are now starting to realize what has happened, they still don't get it. It was all deliberate. Obama got exactly what he wanted.
Ex-Obama officials say hesitation to use force in Syria, elsewhere, emboldened adversaries
News of President Trump’s response to the Syrian chemical attack left several Obama administration officials with a sense of frustration and a reluctant feeling of vindication.
Trump’s decision to act swiftly and decisively, with an airstrike, was what they had wanted to see Barack Obama do in 2013 when he was president and the world learned of the Syrian government’s chemical attack that killed some 1,400 people, including hundreds of children.
But Obama, they say, was too hesitant and too guided by a belief that dialogue was the way to deal with rogue leaders. He preferred the olive branch to the stick in his efforts to appeal to leaders with dangerous instincts, they say.
“I think he left a more dangerous world,” Barry Pavel, senior director for defense policy and strategy on the U.S. National Security Council staff from 2008 to 2010 said.
“In Syria, a major mistake was treating it like a humanitarian crisis, when it was a major national security crisis that has caused destabilization on our closest allies in Europe,” Pavel said, “Syria has been a source of terrorist attacks in Europe and the United States, and future attacks. I worry about that very much.”
“Potential adversaries know we had the capability, but not the will” to strike out at aggressive actions by certain nations against their neighbors or their own people, Pavel, who is director at Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security at the Atlantic Council, said. “Because they knew that the Obama administration would never use military force for any purpose, they felt free to conduct their coercive actions in the South China Seas, the Russians went into Iran and Syria and North Korea accelerated their nuclear arms program.”
Ex-Obama officials say hesitation to use force in Syria, elsewhere, emboldened adversaries
News of President Trump’s response to the Syrian chemical attack left several Obama administration officials with a sense of frustration and a reluctant feeling of vindication.
Trump’s decision to act swiftly and decisively, with an airstrike, was what they had wanted to see Barack Obama do in 2013 when he was president and the world learned of the Syrian government’s chemical attack that killed some 1,400 people, including hundreds of children.
But Obama, they say, was too hesitant and too guided by a belief that dialogue was the way to deal with rogue leaders. He preferred the olive branch to the stick in his efforts to appeal to leaders with dangerous instincts, they say.
“I think he left a more dangerous world,” Barry Pavel, senior director for defense policy and strategy on the U.S. National Security Council staff from 2008 to 2010 said.
“In Syria, a major mistake was treating it like a humanitarian crisis, when it was a major national security crisis that has caused destabilization on our closest allies in Europe,” Pavel said, “Syria has been a source of terrorist attacks in Europe and the United States, and future attacks. I worry about that very much.”
“Potential adversaries know we had the capability, but not the will” to strike out at aggressive actions by certain nations against their neighbors or their own people, Pavel, who is director at Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security at the Atlantic Council, said. “Because they knew that the Obama administration would never use military force for any purpose, they felt free to conduct their coercive actions in the South China Seas, the Russians went into Iran and Syria and North Korea accelerated their nuclear arms program.”
In a way, I am glad that Obama did not use force, because he did not have the resolve or the constitution to follow through with greater force if necessary. He preferred compromise over the use of force, and the Bashar al-Assad's and the Kim Jong-Un's of the world thrived in his extreme hesitation to use force. Obama is Chamberlain to Trump's Churchill.
It's the most interesting thing to me. You can see it every day. There's all sorts of parts to this.
And it's not just family, it's your community, your state. All that little shit is being diminished for THE GREATER GOOD OF THE WORLD!!!
Oh, the hypocrisy is on us but not the group who didn't say shit for eight years but is now concerned with money and budgets? Haha.
We already established that spending money on vacations like that is wrong no matter who it is.
Will she talk about munching Hillary's disgusting box and serving as a mole for the muzzle brotherhood?
If Not, it isn't a tell all.
oh you care about politics but you can't mention the word "obama" until 2017. Go troll the rafters dipshit.
Also shows you how desperate DC is to destroy any outsider to their bullshit.
The left pushed way too far. They got way too effing crazy and naturally, you're seeing pushback.
The left still hasn't realized that people are sick of them. They're sick of being told how to think, sick of being told how to speak, sick of a billion genders, sick of having every movie and show have some gay aspect, sick of being told that whites suck and everyone else are victims, sick of being called "racist" any time we disagree, sick of seeing them attack everyone and destroy a city when they throw a fit, sick of their news media being so one-sided, sick of the promoting of Islam and on and on.
Basically, eff this group. These nuts lose their shit over Trump and Chick-Fil-A while being cool with Che, Castro and Islam.
Don't know if anyone posted it, didn't really read the last few pages.
Huffington Post blogger suggests taking away white men's right to vote
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/1...sts-taking-away-white-mens-right-to-vote.html
Huffington Post blogger suggests taking away white men's right to vote
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/1...sts-taking-away-white-mens-right-to-vote.html
No surprise here, it tends to go hand in hand with planned parenthood.
Last edited:
Wasn't it that moron @cardkilla who said the MOAB costs 500 million dollars or some such nonsense? Not only was he wrong, but he wasn't even in the same universe.
It costs a whopping 170,000 dollars.
http://www.businessinsider.com/real-cost-of-moab-mother-of-all-bombs-170-000-2017-4
It costs a whopping 170,000 dollars.
http://www.businessinsider.com/real-cost-of-moab-mother-of-all-bombs-170-000-2017-4
Liberals are the enemies of America.
They despise those who actually built this country and won't be happy until we're another South Africa.
$1800 per dead muzzie?
I'll take that all day long...
Just about a billion more to go...
It cost a lot more than that to train, equip, and mobilize a soldier to go over there and take one out.
Last edited:
It would be great if it were a "tell some", but it will most likely be a "lie all".
Not to mention if just one soldier loses a leg or an arm (or a life, God forbid)... the economic cost, the social cost, possibly a lifetime of care etc. etc.
It's hard to fathom how much better we, the middle east, and the rest of the world would be right now if Saddam and his nutty sons were still in power...
Some North Korean propaganda to get your weekend started:
An NBC news report did an analysis of how much it cost to take one Marine from civilian to combat ready. Almost $45,000.00 and that is before you spend the money to mobilize him/her. They also said they were low balling the cost.
Shaking my GD head.
Edit: HuffPo removed the post. Good, because I planned on tearing that ass up with numerous expletives.
Last edited:
Warms my heart watching Trump tossing Obamas legacy in the trash.
In a few years it'll be almost like Obama never existed.
His "leader" is Cuckdeau, the burka-loving muzzie-apologist dandy.
And you redneck idiots are "led" by a reality tv star.
I've got news for you clowns. At the end of Trump's presidency, your life probably won't have changed much. If you're a loser now, you'll still be a loser 4-8 years from now. Same thing if you're successful now. And the same would be true had Hillary or Cruz or Sanders or anyone else won the election.
The ironic thing about most of these idiot liberals marching to demand to see Trumps tax returns, have probably not paid a dime in taxes themselves.
Trump pays more in taxes in 1 year than most of them have their entire lives.
Trump pays more in taxes in 1 year than most of them have their entire lives.
John, you ignorant slut! Your country lives under the umbrella of safety that my country provides and you have the audacity to criticize the manner in which we provide it. You need us on that border, you want us on that border. Excuse me if I just say, STFU.
And we will all know we were born with the freedom and exceptionalism running through our veins.
He pays more in taxes in one year than they'll even EARN in their entire lives.
This is funny. First off, I live in Lexington. Second, Canada doesn't need your help - Canada doesn't meddle where they don't belong and as such nobody is out plotting to kill Canadians. America is hated because of the holier than thou, better than you attitude most Americans have. Oh, and the Christianity thing - what a load of BS that is.
What's ironic is that the Bible thumping necks that swept the president into power call liberals idiots while at the same time blindly believing in an imaginary Jew. You can't make that kind of stuff up.
We are better than canada and Canadians. The not even debatable.
You agree. Otherwise you wouldn't be here.
The post you are responding to went right over your head.
Canada doesn't have to involve itself in the world militarily because America has taken on the burden of filling that role. And given that you moved here, work here, live here, and are raising a family here, you must recognize that America affords a better opportunity for those who are willing to work for it...and even for those who aren't.
You think if the USA didn't exist, the world would just "live and let live?" Canada would be a world of sunshine and happiness? Think again. Without this nation that you reside in and benefit from but apparently feel superior to, Canada would be somebody's bitch 3 times over. We are playing the role of the "ugly American" so you don't have to. You're welcome, you thankless POS.
You may live in Lexington, but you are not American. You are basically a carpetbagger who came here to earn money off the system you want to decry. That makes you a hypocrite as well. Bastards like you are the first to whine when there is a natural disaster anywhere in world, "where is America, why can't they do more to help these people"?
Oh, and the Christianity thing - you're barking up the wrong tree pal. Your powder is wet using that one on me.
bravo. A great merging of Jack and Dan.
