POLITICAL THREAD

[moe_schmoe]

Exactly how long has Obama been spying on Trump?

CIA Whistleblower Leaked Proof Trump Under "Systematic Illegal" Surveillance Over Two Years Ago: FBI Sat On It

The same day House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes gave a press conference disclosing that President Trump had been under "incidental surveillance," Attorney and FreedomWatch Chairman, Larry Klayman, sent a letter to the House Committee on Intelligence imploring them to pursue the claims and evidence presented under oath at a Washington DC FBI Field Office by his client - CIA / NSA Whistleblower Dennis Montgomery.

Montgomery left the NSA and CIA with 47 hard drives and over 600 million pages of information, much of which is classified, and sought to come forward legally as a whistleblower to appropriate government entities, including congressional intelligence committees, to expose that the spy agencies were engaged for years in systematic illegal surveillance on prominent Americans, including the chief justice of the Supreme Court, other justices, 156 judges, prominent businessmen such as Donald Trump, and even yours truly. Working side by side with Obama's former Director of National Intelligence (DIA), James Clapper, and Obama's former Director of the CIA, John Brennan, Montgomery witnessed “up close and personal” this “Orwellian Big Brother” intrusion on privacy, likely for potential coercion, blackmail or other nefarious purposes.

Given the fact that the FBI had Montgomery's testimony and evidence for over two years, Klayman traveled to Washington DC last Thursday to meet with Committee Chairman Devin Nunes in the hopes that he would ask FBI Director Comey why the FBI hadn't pursued Montgomery's evidence.

Klayman has detailed all of this in a NewsMax article, followed up with an official letter to Chairman Nunes today, requesting that he question Comey on Montgomery's evidence.

 

[Willy4UK]

LOL

 

[moe_schmoe]

Whatever it takes to take the spotlight off of radical Islam.

 

[moe_schmoe]

It was so over the top I just had to go look it up. @ some of the replies in the thread.Tough crowd.

 

[Willy4UK]

It was so over the top I just had to go look it up. @ some of the replies in the thread.Tough crowd.

View embedded media

I mean, realllly????? I know. It almost seems like it's a joke.

 

[BigBlueRick]

Modernizing healthcare and the space race were conservatives worst nightmare?

Clearly was talking about Peace Corps. But the Health Care he started used redistribution of wealth to poor and elderly. The New Frontier is generally viewed by conservatives as a waste of money. But overall JFK was liberal, and objectively had success.

 

[Catfan in Tn.]

JFK was not a Liberal. More on a Conservative to Moderate Democrat.

 

[BigBlueRick]

JFK was not a Liberal. More on a Conservative to Moderate Democrat.

Yes he was. Read my post. I stated FACTS, not opinions.

 

[Catfan in Tn.]

Yes he was. Read my post. I stated FACTS, not opinions.

. No he wasn't. A Liberal propose a tax cut????

 

[Mojocat]

I can't remember who I was talking about Homeland with in here, but it looks like the devolution is complete. Sheesh. Why alienate presumably half of your potential audience?

To save you the trouble:

• the Iranians are honorable
• the bad guys are the Israelis and a 'cabal' of hawks in the CIA
• the main bad guy in the CIA is also a sexual predator, just because
• the hero is the female president-elect, clearly modeled on Hillary
• at every turn, she is able to explain herself in a way designed to make HC look good and her critics unreasonable

I'm not one who sees political narrative in every movie and TV show. But this is so heavy handed, it beats you over the head. Plus the plot this season is just boring, anyway.

 

[warrior-cat]

People on here have their own distorted view of history to favor their political beliefs. FDR ruined America? What? Someone else said JFK wasn't actually liberal (@bigblueinsanity). He launched Peace Corps, which is the conservatives worst nightmare (welfare for other countries), modern Health Care, and space race.

Actually puppy, the distorted view is the one you are being taught now. The further we get away from those time frames, the more distorted the history books or your teachers remember how it was. The political favor in which you post about is more likely coming from the left. You and your snowflake buddies do not have a real education so to speak since much of what was taught in the past is being rewritten or translated by left leaning liberal teachers. The school of life will hopefully teach you enough so that you do not get yourself killed or wind up being someone's bitch.

 

[Moopyj]

you'd think there' be like a million muslim peace march or something if they really were peaceful but no, nothing. Like the woman walking past that terrorism victim on her phone they are all in on it.

 

[AustinTXCat]

Agree on the health care. I also heard about allowing ISPs to sell browser history. WTF???

 

[Willy4UK]

JFK was not a Liberal. More on a Conservative to Moderate Democrat.

BUT JFK STARDED THE PEECE COR MAN

 

[warrior-cat]

Getting a piece was at the core of my youth.

 

[Bill Cosby]

I can't remember who I was talking about Homeland with in here, but it looks like the devolution is complete. Sheesh. Why alienate presumably half of your potential audience?

To save you the trouble:

• the Iranians are honorable
• the bad guys are the Israelis and a 'cabal' of hawks in the CIA
• the main bad guy in the CIA is also a sexual predator, just because
• the hero is the female president-elect, clearly modeled on Hillary
• at every turn, she is able to explain herself in a way designed to make HC look good and her critics unreasonable

I'm not one who sees political narrative in every movie and TV show. But this is so heavy handed, it beats you over the head. Plus the plot this season is just boring, anyway.

I cannot imagine where they would have come up with a story about the deep state, led by a child molesters, working diligently to undermine the incoming POTUS and perpetuate the power of the intelligence agencies while using a large secret internet company to influence public opinion.



It's honestly like a goddam documentary this season.



(Someone needs to give Peter Quinn some stem cells or something so he instantly gets back to normal. I'll buy whatever the hell reason they sell me as long as he snaps back.)

 

[qwesley]

Man in Antwerp, Belgium, Tries to Drive Into Crowd: NYT

...With tensions already high in Europe after a similar attack involving a vehicle on Wednesday near Parliament in London, Belgian prosecutors identified the suspect only as Mohamed R., in keeping with traditional practice — a 39-year-old French resident of North African ancestry....

More Amish terrorism.

Now that we have determined they are technically Asian, perhaps they are just bad drivers?

 

[Mojocat]

I cannot imagine where they would have come up with a story about the deep state, led by a child molesters, working diligently to undermine the incoming POTUS and perpetuate the power of the intelligence agencies while using a large secret internet company to influence public opinion.



It's honestly like a goddam documentary this season.



(Someone needs to give Peter Quinn some stem cells or something so he instantly gets back to normal. I'll buy whatever the hell reason they sell me as long as he snaps back.)

heh. yep, Quinn is a favored character - will be interesting to see how he evolves to his old, unaffected self.

 

[ymmot31]

Yes he was. Read my post. I stated FACTS, not opinions.

I can easily show you several sources with facts that say he was a moderate liberal at worst and that was regarding social policy. He was anti-communist which today would mean the same exact thing as anti-liberal.

 

[Catfan in Tn.]

I can easily show you several sources with facts that say he was a moderate liberal at worst and that was regarding social policy. He was anti-communist which today would mean the same exact thing as anti-liberal.

And Conservative when it came to taxes.

 

[FusterCluck]

I can easily show you several sources with facts that say he was a moderate liberal at worst and that was regarding social policy. He was anti-communist which today would mean the same exact thing as anti-liberal.

One would wonder why the term "Kennedy Democrat" exists.

 

[BigBlueRick]

Actually puppy, the distorted view is the one you are being taught now. The further we get away from those time frames, the more distorted the history books or your teachers remember how it was. The political favor in which you post about is more likely coming form the left. You and your snowflake buddies do not have a real education so to speak since much of what was taught in the past is being rewritten or translated by left leaning liberal teachers. The school of life will hopefully teach you enough so that you do not get yourself killed or wind up being someone's bitch.

You really don't see the hypocrisy do you?

 

[bigblueinsanity]

People on here have their own distorted view of history to favor their political beliefs. FDR ruined America? What? Someone else said JFK wasn't actually liberal (@bigblueinsanity). He launched Peace Corps, which is the conservatives worst nightmare (welfare for other countries), modern Health Care, and space race.

Yes he was. Read my post. I stated FACTS, not opinions.

Lol wow.

 

[qwesley]

You really don't see the hypocrisy do you?

 

[Bill Cosby]

 

[CatsFanGG24]

Not going to be funny when you're lil 4th grader learns about the first black president who started universal healthcare, won Nobel peace prices, and changed the world. TMFS.

I mean, really, what do you think the textbooks will say? Just conveniently skip over our first black president?

I've mentioned this before, but in my college debate class our big group debate to end the year was: President Obama's first 100 days - is he the best president of all time?

 

[cat_in_the_hat]

Yes he was. Read my post. I stated FACTS, not opinions.

Where are your facts regarding FDR and how he saved the country during the Great Depression?

 

[warrior-cat]

You really don't see the hypocrisy do you?

As I stated, your education has been controlled. You don't even understand the word you used up above. Please do yourself a favor and get a life education to go along with the liberal institutionalized one you have already received and pledged allegiance to.

 

[Rex Kwon Do]

"Mommy, what's a Dirty Pinocchio?"

In the spirit of this being the political thread I'm sure you've handed out a few "Abe Lincolns" in your day....

 

[Catfan in Tn.]

Democrats say they will make a deal to get Gorsuch approved if the Republicans agree not to use the nuclear option for future Supreme Court picks. Republicans falling for this in 5,4,3,2,1.

 

[Bill Cosby]

Democrats say they will make a deal to get Gorsuch approved if the Republicans agree not to use the nuclear option for future Supreme Court picks. Republicans falling for this in 5,4,3,2,1.

LOL, OK. Do the Republicans have to pinky swear or what?

I've been pretty fed up with the Rs lately, but I have no problem with them agreeing to this. So long as they only agree with the intention of reneging in the future.

 

[Willy4UK]

In the spirit of this being the political thread I'm sure you've handed out a few "Abe Lincolns" in your day....

hahahaha

 

[Bill Cosby]

I do like the fact that some Ds are throwing out a compromise based on the future pick.

Proves they're just shameless hacks who have no valid reasons to oppose Gorsuch.

 

[bigblueinsanity]

I do like the fact that some Ds are throwing out a compromise based on the future pick.

Proves they're just shameless hacks who have no valid reasons to oppose Gorsuch.

Yep. No way anyone should compromise on gorsuch. Thapar will be next to scotus now that he's nominated for 6th circuit and they won't be able to oppose him either.

No need for compromise on those two.

As an aside, these two picks are illustrative of how moderate trump is. They're both incredible picks who follow the law. As opposed to the Obama appointees who just rule with a liberal viewpoint every single time.

 

[warrior-cat]

Democrats say they will make a deal to get Gorsuch approved if the Republicans agree not to use the nuclear option for future Supreme Court picks. Republicans falling for this in 5,4,3,2,1.

They should simply nuke this one and then use another nuke in the future. No deals because to coin a phrase "we won the election, deal with it". You think the dems would not be steamrolling everything if they were in charge of the three legislative branches. They did it before with no concern for half of this country. NUKE EM!.

 

[PhattyJ4UK]

Lol.


"We will give you what you want and could and will easily have if you promise not to act like us."

Idiots.

 

[Bill Cosby]

I'd honestly prefer they use the nuclear option on this one. Then Trump takes one of Obama's drones off the Syrian schools they're hovering over and send it to Ruth Bader Ginsburg's house so they can nuclear option another pick.

 

[BigBlueRick]

I can easily show you several sources with facts that say he was a moderate liberal at worst and that was regarding social policy. He was anti-communist which today would mean the same exact thing as anti-liberal.

He pushed for social equality, and welfare among the poor/minorities. That's liberalism at its core.

 

[Bill Cosby]

You misguided child...

 

[thabigbluenation]

He pushed for social equality, and welfare among the poor/minorities. That's liberalism at its core.

you know that whole 'not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country" thing? not sure that plays out in today's dem party. you know, the country being bad and needing transforming. and everything is wrong because its america's fault ideology.

what you don't get is liberalism is dead. this coastal obama democratic party abandoned it. the liberals still believed in capitalism, in this country. the dems now are a progressive socialist party.