If it did, would defeatists potheads be motivated enough to do it?First thing he does, nominate the cesspool. If voting did something, they wouldn't let you vote.
If it did, would defeatists potheads be motivated enough to do it?First thing he does, nominate the cesspool. If voting did something, they wouldn't let you vote.
We could have easily have taken over western Europe and most of southeast Asia after WW2. Instead, we rebuilt it and gave it back.And of course you're welcome to call my positions stupid. Most Americans do. I'm fully aware my positions are a small minority. But they are my positions, not fed to me.
We needed an enemy to be able to bribe up our alliance against. We were the strongest power behind the Allies by the end of the war, the sole bomb havers/users. If we had betrayed the USSR, pushed to Moscow and taken over the world, what then? We would've had to rule it. Think about how much anti-American sentiment there is out there in the world today because of the amount of imperialism we have engaged in. Now think about what it would look like had we actually taken over the world directly instead of just from behind the curtain. I understand this isn't the economic argument you were making, but it's the practical, logistical reality.
Demnut Stan laughing at my comment above about killing innocents vs. murders. What a clown show.
Lol, pothead. If smoking to ease OCD makes me a ''pothead'' then so be it.If it did, would defeatists potheads be motivated enough to do it?
No, SCOTUS just declined to grant a stay on the lower court's injunction. Basically, the government asked if the rest of the new regulation could go into effect without the new sex guideline that the 12 states objected to. SCOTUS ruled that guideline was inseverable, so the whole regulation's still on pause until the Sixth Circuit rules on it. Which could still go either way.
False. More redefining of what is said by you left leaning loons.It specifically says poll tax. Which any payment required to vote is.
Excellent.
Really sucks the socialists in this country hijacked that word.Excellent.
Toss this BATSHIT librul idiocy in the shitcan where it belongs. What's next you stupid mfers?
We absolutely could have taken it. What then though? We're almost 80 years out from that. You think we would still have it now? Everyone would've been against us. The world would be very different, and very probably not in a good way.We could have easily have taken over western Europe and most of southeast Asia after WW2. Instead, we rebuilt it and gave it back.
This country was sold to the defense industry sometime after 1955.
Communism is a death cult. It's failed everywhere it's been tried. It only works on small island nations. And I do mean small. Captialism has pitfalls, but it's better than the other options. Anyone who openly wants communism is uneducated at best. Or ignorant at worst.
Ok, if I walk in to vote, and the worker there says, "No, you aren't allowed to vote until you pay me $10 for handling the documents of the election." What is that? It's exactly the same as @trueblujr2's 'search fee, not a tax'. Of course it's a poll tax, wtf else would it even be?False. More redefining of what is said by you left leaning loons.
Standing on tiptoes.George Slopadopolous is 5'5" tall, lmao.
Trust me, it wasn't our doing; we don't like being called it. I'm a leftist, not a crappy liberal. Just uneducated people being uneducated and using incorrect terminology.Really sucks the socialists in this country hijacked that word.
Again, y'all are celebrating like this did the thing. It didn't. This country is so stupid. At least I already didn't have a high opinion of Riley Gaines to be dashed.
Standing on tiptoes.
The self-professed AP Calc wizard pretends that he cannot distinguish between ending foreign spending and the ruinous “Inflation Reduction Act”.Let’s let @BankerCat12 answer what he meant when he said we should be spending it on the American people instead.
Spoken like a man without a daughter.Again, y'all are celebrating like this did the thing. It didn't. This country is so stupid. At least I already didn't have a high opinion of Riley Gaines to be dashed.
If I had a daughter I'd tell her her self-worth isn't determined by how fast other people can swim in a pool. She should do her best and always strive to improve. That doesn't change just because she isn't Michael Phelps and never will be. It doesn't matter at all whether Riley Gaines isn't as good as Katie Ledecky or isn't as good as Michael Phelps. She still isn't as good.Spoken like a man without a daughter.
Responses like this are why I can’t take you seriously.This is true. But Trump’s tariffs are equally dumb. This is the conundrum. Both sides advocate dumb populist plans that have no chance of actually going into effect.
Isn’t it strange that you don’t hold the same view when it comes to income?If I had a daughter, I'd tell her her self-worth isn't determined by how fast other people can swim in a pool. She should do her best and always strive to improve.
It’s not a mystery . It was my job . I was in the industry ,on the legal and financial side.
In a nutshell, banks and mortgage companies were shamed into offering mortgage loans to people they knew couldn’t afford it, and would default in short order.
That’s it. Not really any need for further discussion.
You know, after what went down in 2020, I don’t think we should be using crowd sizes to predict the outcome of the election. Kamala will be a disaster for this country, but let’s not underestimate Democrats ability to generate ballots for their candidates. If the GOP can’t beat the Dems at their own game of subterfuge, then there’s a high risk of a 2020 repeat.
I do. The problem is if you suck at swimming in a pool, nothing happens. Just avoid swimming. If you suck at accruing income, you die. You can't avoid eating.Isn’t it strange that you don’t hold the same view when it comes to income?
You know, after what went down in 2020, I don’t think we should be using crowd sizes to predict the outcome of the election. Kamala will be a disaster for this country, but let’s not underestimate Democrats ability to generate ballots for their candidates. If the GOP can’t beat the Dems at their own game of subterfuge, then there’s a high risk of a 2020 repeat.
Probably because many people don't attribute an economy's success or failure directly to the figurehead of the president. Does Clinton get all the credit for reigning over the tech boom in the 90s? Does Trump get all of the blame for covid wrecking the economy? If you don't answer yes to both questions your initial premise is bunk.Responses like this are why I can’t take you seriously.
Did you see Trump’s economy (pre-COVID fiasco) when he had his tariffs in place? It was light years better than what we are seeing right now. I don’t give a sh*t what anyone thinks about Trump’s personality, but he had the economy humming, tariffs and all.
The losses from the mortgages were trivial compared to the CDO losses. CDOs who value vanished once housing prices declined.It’s not a mystery . It was my job . I was in the industry ,on the legal and financial side.
In a nutshell, banks and mortgage companies were shamed into offering mortgage loans to people they knew couldn’t afford it, and would default in short order.
That’s it. Not really any need for further discussion.