Yeah...Scottie is that type of guy.
Is there another video other than the one that came out a week ago from the pole across the street?
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Yes. One where he is cuffed inside the cop car. Released today.
He is being told to convict even though he knows it will be overturned on appeal. They want the talking point, to call Trump a convicted felon. Totally a show trial. Its how they do things in the old soviet union.
That would have opened the door for the Cop to find a reason to sue Scottie. Scottie doesn't need the money nor the distraction that suing the cop would bring. On the other hand, Scottie has a fistfull of cash for a vengeful cop who isn't anywhere near Scotties tax bracket. Whether the Cop had any grounds or not he could pursue something that Scottie would want to just settle out of court to get out of the way. So I think that agreement would be wise for Scottie to agree to.
I legitimately want someone with legal experience to tell us how many rules this judge is breaking. How much authority does ANY judge have to set these kinds of parameters within a court. How many of Trump's Civil and Constitutional rights is he violating? Would any other Judge be able to get away with this if it were any ordinary citizen?
Can a lawyer in this thread explain how this is possible? Has this ever been done before? A judge can just make up rules as he/she sees fit? Genuinely curious.
The judge should be charged criminally since his daugther has raised over 100 Million for Democrat candidates. He's using this case to enrich his family as plenty of money from her efforts ends up in their pockets.
Trump is charged with one crime (falsification of records). The penalty for that crime can be elevated to a felony if he committed it while committing or concealing another crime (the "object crime"). The state has thrown out 3 object crimes (federal election violation, state election conspiracy law, and state tax law). The jury has to be unanimous in its verdict on falsification of records. The judge is saying that it doesn't have to be unanimous on which of the object crimes were involved. Whether that is legally correct, I don't know because it is a complicated issue.
I hope Trump (if he somehow wins) sends his DOJ after every single one of these people the second he takes office. Bankrupt them in legal fees. Just maybe these scumbags will think twice the next time they try this crap on a future Republican candidate that they know they can’t beat fairly.
Trump just now. 'De Niro's a broken down old fool out there."
Last edited:
I think it’s closer to people claiming Joe Biden was bought by corrupt Ukrainians because they were paying his son millions of dollars and Biden conveniently acted like he worked for the corrupt Ukrainians.
Funny this is that De Niro doesn't give a flying flip about the country, let alone the world. He cares about himself and staying relevant. Every democrat puke around this case is using it to further themselves. Lowlife's.
Most I've known of the case. Assuming you're correct, thanks. I take if the object cases don't have to be unanimous, 7-5 is enough?
I'm curious too because I don't think it would go that way in neither ky state court nor federal court. Iirc there must be a unanimous verdict on the underlying crime and any enhancement. The enhancement is typically a separate count, except in federal court it might be left up to the judge at sentencing.
Never heard of a situation where you can mix and match them take the sum to fill the enhancement requirement.
Will one of our resident Libs, Please Please please explain to us how any of this would be beneficial and deter crime? If there is no punishment for lawlessness, what's to prevent a free for all? You know why "crime stats" are "down"? It's because of BS legislation like this nonsense. What recourse do law-abiding citizens have when their homes and businesses are looted because of this BS? I hope Insurance companies start refusing to offer policies in these cities. You think they want to keep paying out claims on damage as a result of this kind of crap?
Somebody please make sense of it all.
Here’s basically what Judge Merchan said to the jurors:
“I honestly don’t care what you convict Trump on, just convict him. End of story.”
There’s absolutely no way you can look at this case and how the judge has acted and say this is in any way fair.
“I honestly don’t care what you convict Trump on, just convict him. End of story.”
There’s absolutely no way you can look at this case and how the judge has acted and say this is in any way fair.
Of course, cause it is not about law...it's just 'get Trump'
His daughter is taking in millions from democratic lawmakers as a “media influencer/coordinator”. The fact he is presiding over this case is absurd.
Sounds like the Boston mayor is basically saying you are free to do everything but rape or murder.
There will be an exodus out of the cities by a lot of people, problem is the criminals will follow into once safe communities, We already see it happening in California.
Last edited:
Trying to help a patriot.....just got a huge box(s) of My Pillow stuff.
It’s why Beriya said show me the man, I’ll show you the crime.
It’s surreal that this point that I never really believed would get here, is now here. Justice has become a weapon of tyranny.
Last edited:
Trump will win on appeal. Even if it has to go all the way to the Supreme Court.
The whole point of this rigged trial was to get him off the campaign trail and to be able to say he is a 'convicted felon'
The whole point of this rigged trial was to get him off the campaign trail and to be able to say he is a 'convicted felon'
The fact this case exists at all is absurd.
These Stalinists have pushed every chip into the center of the table, beginning with the Russia hoax and extending to the 2020 election fraud: they are betting that Americans are either too stupid or too apathetic to care what they do.
And when they solidify power with their millions of illegal voters, and then pack the supreme court- this trial will look it was run by Solomon.
We ain’t seen nothing yet.
We ain’t seen nothing yet.
The question is how quickly can this be appealed and overturned? Especially if this corrupt judge forces him into Jail with no bond.
You may be right. I'm not a criminal lawyer although I was a public defender many years ago. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me and would seem to be a good issue on appeal.
The Judge said the jury just has to agree that he committed a crime. They don't have to agree on what that crime was, LOL.
The judge should be stripped of his robe and arrested IMO.
The judge should be stripped of his robe and arrested IMO.
If you learned that the judge in a case you were working had relatives getting millions from people who wanted a guilty verdict against your client…..
that wouldn’t trouble you?
This is a low point. The Founders have to be turning in their graves today.
It’s dumb, all of them survived for hundreds of years. Of which they were diverse the entire time. Rome had black emperors when it ruled most of the world. It didn’t collapse the next day.
Similar threads
