ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
All of them were diverse empires consisting of multiple different ethnic groups and mixed racial makeups that spanned multiple continents. I only used examples where multiple ethnicities were allowed positions of power too, rather than one ruling over the rest.

? What do you mean? How do you think we got ours?
I don’t equate the pilgrims to a Mongol invasion force. But I get what you’re saying to a degree.
 
All of them were diverse empires consisting of multiple different ethnic groups and mixed racial makeups that spanned multiple continents. I only used examples where multiple ethnicities were allowed positions of power too, rather than one ruling over the rest.

? What do you mean? How do you think we got ours?
False.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
Trump is a genius!
GOuIozZaEAAi-Ot
 
The POS is basically forcing them to convict him because he's made it obvious to them that it's what he wants, WOW !!

Merchan: I AM RESPONSIBLE FOR EXPLAINING THE LAW, NOT THE LAWYERS. YOUR SWORN DUTY AS JURORS IS TO FOLLOW MY INSTRUCTIONS ON THE LAW, AS YOU PROMISED ME THAT YOU WOULD.

Not that I care for Merchan, but isn't his statement correct? Lawyers?
 
There is a reason it wasn't televised. If this were just to embarrass Trump, then it would have been full show. But this is to "get" Trump and they couldn't afford to show how bad it was in there.
The judge ruled against them on almost every motion and objection. Dershowitz today said that the judge had ruled the prosecution couldn't say a certain thing in their closing.... well they did and the defense objected. The judge overruled the objection... Stuff like that was just so insane in this case that tons of democrat atty's are saying it's really a bad look.
 
The criminal attorneys Trump is using in these various criminal cases are good. It is hard to know how well anyone did in this trial because it was not televised (this is a NY state court rule, not something made up for this case to screw Trump), but it seems to me that Blanche and co did a good job.
 
It would be illegal too. LOL. They kept their primary closed to make sure Biden got the nomination.... If they remove him now then it'll be hard for them to claim to be the "democracy" party. It'll be a group of elites picking a candidate without anyone voting.
If illegal, what crime would be committed to make it so? None of the stuff you mention is a crime.

So they cause added problems for themselves. You have a problem with that?
 
Judge rules that on three of the charges, 4 people would count as unanimous. LOL. This is the only case that will be before the election so it’s all hands on deck.
seriously, is this judge just making up shit as he goes along? in what world is he allowed to determine what unanimous is for a conviction? please tell me this is common practice and not just throwing shit at the wall.
 
Same playbook....hopefully same result.

Here in Ohio when J.D. Vance was running, his Dem opponent (who was a big lib in Congress) was running ads about how he voted for a bill(s?) that Trump signed. How he agreed with Trump on certain issues. He Lost.

Now....the same type ads are being run for Sherrod Brown (Dem Senator up for reelection). How he co-sponsored a bill that Trump signed and how he can work with Republicans (even though he has voted with Biden 98% of the time). Would imagine Brown and the Dems are worried about his chances.
 
NEW: Charges against Scottie Scheffler will be dropped today. The agreement stipulates that both sides agree not to pursue any legal action related to the ramifications of the May 17 arrest.
Yep. That was the initial fear, that Scottie could sue LMPD if they dropped them without the agreement. I know Steve Romines and the story about that morning how he got the call from his agent...is a hoot.
 
seriously, is this judge just making up shit as he goes along? in what world is he allowed to determine what unanimous is for a conviction? please tell me this is common practice and not just throwing shit at the wall.
Well it’s my understanding that the federal elections violations should not even be considered for this trial. But somehow Bragg and the judge have wrangled that into the equation. They’re going to throw him in jail come hell or high water. The judge has been paid handsomely for that.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT