ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
So you’ll admit Fauci, Biden, Walensky (CDC), all MSM (sponsored by Pfizer/moderna), Gates, Bourla (Pfizer CEO) all lied then?

Because that’s not what they said. They said you wouldn’t catch Covid, get sick, or transmit the disease. Quotes are all available online.

First step is understanding you were lied to. We can go from there on the overall inefficacy and “safety” if you’d like.
Fauci said the vaccines were protective... Not a complete cure.
From Dec 2021....
"Writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, Fauci and two colleagues said the virus that causes Covid-19 is unlikely to be eliminated, and current vaccines are too limited to prevent the emergence of new variants."
 
Your reasoning is insane. Take this advice: a broken clock is right twice a day. They specifically call out "foreign adversary" in this bill - and define that to be China, NK, Russia and Iran. Therefore they can't use this to ban X or something else. And Saudi Arabia is not on that list, btw. Bottom line - your logic is f'ing stupid.
Good thing our government isnt calling almost everything they dont like Russian disinformation. They wouldnt do that would they?
 
Fauci said the vaccines were protective... Not a complete cure.
From Dec 2021....
"Writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, Fauci and two colleagues said the virus that causes Covid-19 is unlikely to be eliminated, and current vaccines are too limited to prevent the emergence of new variants."

“When people are vaccinated, they’re not going to get infected” - Fauci

That’s a bit beyond simply saying they’re “protective” which I don’t see that in your article.

However your article does admit how difficult if not near impossible it is to vaccinate against coronavirus. Too short of an incubation time, too rapid of a mutation time…they escape the vaccine impulse. They outrun vaccination efforts. This has been common knowledge since at least 1990 and all medical studies and journals reflect that.

My point in all this is that they knew this and lied to the public, purposefully, for various imo nefarious reasons. It created a frenzy and caused people like you to demonize people like me over a lie. The POTUS didn’t help the matter by doing the same.
 
You don't like facts. But they are facts whether you like it or not.
Yes, you are right. Facts matter. Here is a very comprehensive timeline and fact-checking of comments made by Fauci. The website is widely-considered accurate and reliable.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: sambowieshin
Your reasoning is insane. Take this advice: a broken clock is right twice a day. They specifically call out "foreign adversary" in this bill - and define that to be China, NK, Russia and Iran. Therefore they can't use this to ban X or something else. And Saudi Arabia is not on that list, btw. Bottom line - your logic is f'ing stupid.


How are you reading Section 2(g)(1)(C), in context of establishment politicians accusing everyone that disagrees with them of being “Putin puppets” and not thinking they could deem Musk controlled by Russia or China and force divesture or shut it down?

That provision seems pretty broad to me.

Similarly the provisions that refer to “controlled by a foreign adversary” when “foreign adversary countries” are defined, but not the term “foreign adversary” separately?
 
  • Like
Reactions: screwduke1
On this issue the people you're railing at have patriotism. You have nationalism. Learn the difference. In this instance it isn't them who're the losers.
GIuXkziX0AISKjo
 
Yes, you are right. Facts matter. Here is a very comprehensive timeline and fact-checking of comments made by Fauci. The website is widely-considered accurate and reliable.

factcheck.org. LOL

Factcheck.org funding

"In addition, we received $42,300 from Facebook as part of a fact-checking project to debunk social media misinformation."

LOL. Who controls what facebook allows to be seen on it's platform again? Wouldn't be the Feds now would it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: screwduke1
BS. There were people living across the entire country. Using those resources. Cahokia was probably larger than contemporary London or Paris at its peak. Just because you don’t know about them doesn’t mean they didn’t exist.

Assimilation happens every day. How many children of Indian or Mexican immigrants do you know? They’re exactly the same Americans as you or me. We’re all children of immigrants and we all make America what it is together. There is no us and them.
heh

 
Looks like fani stays but her lover goes. Given the potential perjury and what the judge discussed on race baiting it seems like the trump attorneys should go to the Georgia bar association. In addition to that the state legislature could rank fani. I’ve seen attorneys lose their license for less. So she’s not out yet but she will wish she was pretty soon.
 
factcheck.org. LOL

Factcheck.org funding

"In addition, we received $42,300 from Facebook as part of a fact-checking project to debunk social media misinformation."

LOL. Who controls what facebook allows to be seen on it's platform again? Wouldn't be the Feds now would it?
Deciding what is allowed on social media and fact-checking it are two (2) separate and distinct things.
Freedom of speech and fact-checking the accuracy of statements actually made are not the same.

Your quotation, taken from the diclosure for the three months ending December 31, 2023, is incomplete.
Here is the FactCheck.org statement, cut-and-pasted, as the second sentence was not included:

"In addition, we received $42,300 from Facebook as part of a fact-checking project to debunk social media misinformation. Facebook has no control over our editorial decisions."

This statement is regularly and routinely included in the financial disclosure of funding sources for each quarter. Only the actual amount(s) received during the period is/are different.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: sambowieshin

Springstain is such a freakin loon. What a turdblossom

How can he be so ignorant as to think Sniffy Joe would run into a burning building or risk taking a bullet for anyone!? Joe's more like the guy that would be trying to lure someone's kid into a rusted out conversion van with year old candy...
 
Last edited:
Why are posting that? Of course she was mentally ill. She thought she was a dude.
Shouldn't have been able to legally purchase that weapon of war with mental health issues. Only ones who think that is ok are Republicans.
What's your excuse for these??



 
I see "tenants" and can't stop laughing. Was this guy the "teacher" or was that supposed to be DyinIsis?
Nothing points to a lower IQ than those who pick out a single misspelling of a word as a sign of intelligence.
Reminds me of my special ed students in class when someone would occasionally make a verbal gaff.
They were all over it because of their own low self esteem and intelligence issues.
So very similar to the movie Idiocracy. 🤣
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT