POLITICAL THREAD

[morgousky]

So what you're saying is its not a criminal act for a child to sell his or her body for sex in California?

He's just being a liberal.

You can't attack them with common sense. He's doing what they always do, it's why the phrase "what is normal" is the most beloved statement on a college campus. take the answers out of common sense solutions, and distort terms. A prositite is not a prostitute now, its a victim. So you can't punish a victim.

They want this with drugs. Both dealers and users.

Again, this is how they operate. Slowly slide down the slippery slope, desensitizing people as they go, working their way towards the goal.

It's a brilliant strategy that has worked over the last 60 years.

 

[Bill Cosby]

Nope, what I'm saying is that it's illegal for a child to consent to sex in CA, either for commercial or private purposes.

What I'm also saying that is child prostitution is illegal in CA, and it carries criminal charges for those involved.

So you're saying if someone under the age of 18 in CA willingly has sex with another person, over or under the age of 18, the U18 can be charged with a crime for willingly engaging in sex?

And you're saying that a child who sells his or her body in CA can be charged with a crime?


Or you now realize you read the headline of an article, ran with it without stopping to think for yourself, and are now carefully choosing your words so as not to admit you were wrong?

 

[Mime-Is-Money]

Or you now realize you read the headline of an article, ran with it without stopping to think for yourself, and are now carefully choosing your words so as not to admit you were wrong?

How am I wrong? Is Child Prostitution legal in CA? Is it decriminalized? This is the argument.

I can answer for you on both. No and No.

 

[Willy4UK]

How am I wrong? Is Child Prostitution legal in CA? Is it decriminalized? This is the argument.

I can answer for you on both. No and No.

So exactly what is the law? hahaha

 

[WildcatofNati]

Odd that Antifa seems to love protesting in places like Seattle and Berkley and not Houston or Atlanta. What in the wide wide world of sports could be keeping them from starting fights with people in those states? Hmm? I can't quite put my finger on how the outcome would be different in those two places

I would LOVE to see the moonbats acting like this in Cincinnati. Granted, Cincinnati is relatively blue city (in what is now a red state), but I still don't think it would go very well for the moonbats.

 

[Bill Cosby]

How am I wrong? Is Child Prostitution legal in CA? Is it decriminalized? This is the argument.

I can answer for you on both. No and No.

My goodness you are dumb.

Read the goddam posts before you called everyone "idiot sheep" and posted your dumbass article. They are 100% accurate. You're now trying to spin the argument around as if we haven't been talking about the child being charged with a crime.

Yes you moron, if you are an adult and pay a child for sex YOU will be charged with a crime. Not the child. It is not a criminal act for the child.

I hope to god you understand what everyone is saying, and are just too stubborn to admit you're wrong. If that's not the case, you are just really really really dumb.

 

[mdlUK.1]

Give me a break. Gi's flying Trump flag are going to be in trouble. Showed some "woman" that said she was a 28 year vet, complained.

http://m.wave3.com/wave/db/336805/content/TO5yxNpR

 

[Mime-Is-Money]

So exactly what is the law? hahaha

Child prostitution is not legal. The John and the person responsible for setting up the transaction will be criminally charged. The child victim will be under the custody of the county child protection services.

 

[Bill Cosby]

I would LOVE to see the moonbats acting like this in Cincinnati. Granted, Cincinnati is relatively blue city (in what is now a red state), but I still don't think it would go very well for the moonbats.

Not like Cincinnati has a history of violent riots or anything.

 

[Willy4UK]

Child prostitution is not legal. The John and the person responsible for setting up the transaction will be criminally charged. The child victim will be under the custody of the county child protection services.

I never said that the John or the Pimp would be exempt.

 

[Willy4UK]

Child prostitution is not legal. The John and the person responsible for setting up the transaction will be criminally charged. The child victim will be under the custody of the county child protection services.

So basically, she/he won't be charged with a crime?

 

[Bill Cosby]

I never said that the John or the Pimp would be exempt.

There's one single solitary person in this thread talking about the John or Pimp.

 

[Bill Cosby]

If Mime didn't have a history of being wrong, refusing to admit it, then twisting the argument as if it were something different all along, I'd think he was trolling us.

 

[Mime-Is-Money]

My goodness you are dumb.

Read the goddam posts before you called everyone "idiot sheep" and posted your dumbass article. They are 100% accurate. You're now trying to spin the argument around as if we haven't been talking about the child being charged with a crime.

Yes you moron, if you are an adult and pay a child for sex YOU will be charged with a crime. Not the child. It is not a criminal act for the child.

I hope to god you understand what everyone is saying, and are just too stubborn to admit you're wrong. If that's not the case, you are just really really really dumb.

Oh wait, there are still criminal charges associated with child prostitution? So I'm correct, it's not decriminalized.

The name calling doesn't refute the fact that child prostitution is illegal in CA, and the US.

The two previous posters said 'child prostitution is legal' and 'child prostitution is decriminalized'. Neither is true.

I never said that child prostitution is not a criminal act for the child/victim. I'm fine being a moron if it means I fully understand that child prostitution is not legal in CA, which it's not, and still carries criminal charges.

 

[Mime-Is-Money]

If Mime didn't have a history of being wrong, refusing to admit it, then twisting the argument as if it were something different all along, I'd think he was trolling us.

If Bill didn't have a history of completely misreading arguments, I'd swear he's drunk.

 

[bigblueinsanity]

Odd that Antifa seems to love protesting in places like Seattle and Berkley and not Houston or Atlanta. What in the wide wide world of sports could be keeping them from starting fights with people in those states? Hmm? I can't quite put my finger on how the outcome would be different in those two places

Same reason the Louisville protests always stay around the nicer parts of main street.

They never go west of ninth. Odd....for such accepting and open minded folk...

 

[Mime-Is-Money]

There's one single solitary person in this thread talking about the John or Pimp.

And you don't think that's the issue?

 

[screwduke1]

What??? You mean we won't be sending them pallets of cash?

 

[Bill Cosby]

If Bill didn't have a history of completely misreading arguments, I'd swear he's drunk.

You called people idiot sheep for saying that children would no longer be criminally charged for engaging in protestation, and it seemed to be a measure intended to protect the victims of crime.

Go back to the last page. I quoted the progression.

I think you owe all those guys you called idiot sheep an apology now that you realize they were right all along, and you fell for a headline.

 

[fuzz77]

Coverage became too expensive for my company as a direct result of Barrycare, they were forced to change, entire network of coverage changed.

As for the kids, their doc chose early retirement as opposed to losing his practice due to being forced to administer medicaid service and not being 100% compensated for those services, you useless twit.

No doc is "forced to administer Medicaid services". There are plenty of docs who don't. If you do agree to accept Medicare/Medicaid patients then you agree to accept their reimbursement rates.


You want to blame "Barrycare" for rising insurance cost? "Barrycare" was passed in 2010 and went into effect in 2014. Want to explain the chart below?
Looks to me like insurance was becoming expensive at a pretty rapid pace beforehand.
To claim that it is "a direct result of Barrycare" shows how little you know and how easily you are duped into believing what you want to believe.

 

[Mime-Is-Money]

You called people idiot sheep for saying that children would no longer be criminally charged for engaging in protestation, and it seemed to be a measure intended to protect the victims of crime.

.

Nope, I called people sheep for believing that child prostitution is legal and is decriminalized.

Is it legal? Are there still criminal penalties?

 

[Bill Cosby]

Nope, I called people sheep for believing that child prostitution is legal and is decriminalized.

Is it legal? Are there still criminal penalties?

You called people idiot sheep for saying the adult would still be charged with a crime, not the child. Read the goddam posts.

Are they idiot sheep, or can the adult still be charged and not the child?

 

[Willy4UK]

I never said that child prostitution is not a criminal act for the child/victim. I'm fine being a moron if it means I fully understand that child prostitution is not legal in CA, which it's not, and still carries criminal charges.

Only for the pimp and the John. Not for the child.

 

[Bill Cosby]

Everyone on Catpaw: Man, it's crazy that kids won't be charged with crimes for selling their bodies in CA

Mime: You are all idiot sheep, read this article

Everyone on Catpaw: Yeah, that article says exactly what you just called everyone idiot sheep for saying

Mime: Adults can be charged with crimes

EoC: yeah, no one said they can't, kids can't

Mime: Adults can be charged with crimes, so technically child prostitution is not legal because adults can be charged with crimes

EoC: Yeah, we get that, we're talking about kids being charged with crimes if they sell their bodies

Mime: Adults can be charged with crimes

EoC: Yeah, we've been talking about kids being charged with cimes this whole time

Mime: Adults can be charged with crimes

 

[Mime-Is-Money]

You called people idiot sheep for saying the adult would still be charged with a crime, not the child. Read the goddam posts.

Are they idiot sheep, or can the adult still be charged and not the child?

Nope, I called them idiot sheep for thinking that child prostitution is legal (said by screwduke) and is decriminalized (WUK).

Willy later said that adults could still be charged, so therefore it's not decriminalized. Not sure what screwduke still believes.

I get it. You're bored and angry.

 

[Mime-Is-Money]

Everyone on Catpaw: Man, it's crazy that kids won't be charged with crimes for selling their bodies in CA

And there lies the rub. Your very first sentence. No one said that at the beginning. Read WUK's and screwduke goddamzomg!1 post.

And you're the only one on 'Catpaw' still defending that child prostitution is decriminalized.

 

[morgousky]

Everyone on Catpaw: Man, it's crazy that kids won't be charged with crimes for selling their bodies in CA

Mime: You are all idiot sheep, read this article

Everyone on Catpaw: Yeah, that article says exactly what you just called everyone idiot sheep for saying

Mime: Adults can be charged with crimes

EoC: yeah, no one said they can't, kids can't

Mime: Adults can be charged with crimes, so technically child prostitution is not legal because adults can be charged with crimes

EoC: Yeah, we get that, we're talking about kids being charged with crimes if they sell their bodies

Mime: Adults can be charged with crimes

EoC: Yeah, we've been talking about kids being charged with cimes this whole time

Mime: Adults can be charged with crimes

And I don't know what the hell he's arguing anyway. I'd almost guarantee Mime supports legislation to legalize prostitution all together. Every liberal friend I have, and I have quite a few, think it should be. I don't think I've ever heard a liberal who doesn't believe prostitution shouldn't be a crime all together. Kids or not.

 

[Willy4UK]

hahahahaha

 

[Willy4UK]

And there lies the rub. Your very first sentence. No one said that at the beginning. Read WUK's and screwduke goddamzomg!1 post.

And you're the only one on 'Catpaw' still defending that child prostitution is decriminalized.

It is decriminalized. Because once before, juveniles caught before were tried as an adult or went to juvie hall. Now they are classified as "victims" and not subject to criminal offense. Yes, it is decriminalized

 

[Bill Cosby]

Mime: "duh, well if you duh read uh one random post from page 1602 duh my uh duh argument make me right"


I think you've been inhaling too much homeless piss out in San Francisco.

 

[thabigbluenation]

No doc is "forced to administer Medicaid services". There are plenty of docs who don't. If you do agree to accept Medicare/Medicaid patients then you agree to accept their reimbursement rates.


You want to blame "Barrycare" for rising insurance cost? "Barrycare" was passed in 2010 and went into effect in 2014. Want to explain the chart below?
Looks to me like insurance was becoming expensive at a pretty rapid pace beforehand.
To claim that it is "a direct result of Barrycare" shows how little you know and how easily you are duped into believing what you want to believe.

but Barrycare was supposed to decrease these cost, by 2500 dollars, he said, a year per family. the affordable care was never intended to work. it was the first step that the libs could get through trying to lead to an entire government takeover of the healthcare system. they don't give a shit about the cost to us, they want the premiums to start coming to them, the govt, rather than to private insurance companies. as far as the overall healthcare, they, the govt, would never care. just one more step towards socialism. think about how many billions a year are paid in premiums to insurers? the govt, the liberals, want there hands on those dollars to come to them, you know, like a tax. then they can redistribute how they see fit. because the big mighty govt knows whats best for the people. besides, the govt doesn't have to pay their bills. they just want their hands on those premiums to come to them.

 

[Mime-Is-Money]

Mime: "duh, well if you duh read uh one random post from page 1602 duh my uh duh argument make me right"


I think you've been inhaling too much homeless piss out in San Francisco.

Bill Cosby : DUR I TELL MIME TO GO BAKC AND REED GODDAMM POST. THEN LAFF WHEN HE CAN ACTUALLY REED POST.

DUR I THINK CHILD WHORING LEGAL IN CA, NO CRIMINAL PENTALTIESZZZ.

That is kinda fun, I can see why you choose this way of arguing

 

[Willy4UK]

Mime: "duh, well if you duh read uh one random post from page 1602 duh my uh duh argument make me right"


I think you've been inhaling too much homeless piss out in San Francisco.

hahaha

 

[Willy4UK]

It is decriminalized. Because once before, juveniles caught before were tried as an adult or went to juvie hall. Now they are classified as "victims" and not subject to criminal offense. Yes, it is decriminalized

 

[morgousky]

It is decriminalized. Because once before, juveniles caught before were tried as an adult or went to juvie hall. Now they are classified as "victims" and not subject to criminal offense. Yes, it is decriminalized

Terrorist bad people? no, they're victims of US interventions

Selling crack and heroine a crime? no, they're victims of their surroundings and do what they have to for survival.

killing babies immoral and illegal? nope, they're not human, and part of the mother. Kill away.

Children selling themselves illegal? nope, it's a victim. Tell them to "cut it out" and send them back to the pimp to learn a lesson.

It's literally the same attack on common sense every time from the left.

Part of something being illegal is to create a deterrent. Children hooked on drugs selling themselves will now have zero deterrent in California.

 

[Mime-Is-Money]

It is decriminalized. Because once before, juveniles caught before were tried as an adult or went to juvie hall. Now they are classified as "victims" and not subject to criminal offense. Yes, it is decriminalized

So it's legal and there are no criminal charges involved?

Please see: definition of "decriminalized"

 

[Willy4UK]

So it's legal and there are no criminal charges involved?

Please see: definition of "decriminalized"

That's what I wanted you to explain and you're not doing it.

Once the juvenile prostitute is arrested. What happens? Are they taken into custody or are given to child services? Does the arrest stick on their personal record?

Maybe you should define "arrested"

 

[bigbluefattycat]

Then their pimp's lawyer shows up, walks them out the station and kicks them out the car 2 blocks down the street. Or they go into "protective" services where they are sold off to the elites who run these agencies to go back into rotation.

Only thing being protected is the criminal's ability to control the assets.

 

[Bill Cosby]

From the Mime-is-Money dictionary I found online:

Decriminalize: verb: meaning to do away with all criminal laws applying to all actors who can be a party to an act.

Child prostitution isn't decriminalized in California because adults can still be charged with crimes; even though no one is actually talking about the adults and I'm a dumb stubborn jackass.

 

[Willy4UK]

Because before. If juvenile prostitutes were caught they were tried as an adult or went to juvie hall. That apparently isn't the case anymore because of the designation of "victim" class.

So what am I missing here? It was a criminal offense before and now the punishment isn't punishment. How is that not decriminalized?