Safety? No idea. Why let dozens of Chinese satellites fly over the entire country?
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Our airspace doesn't apply to orbits. You should know that. Low level craft, like that balloon violate our sovereign airspace at that altitude. I'd be mad if Biden, Trump or Reagan allowed this.
This is about the security of our country, not politics. Im hoping you can agree with that.
Oh right, first time it ever happened in our history and I agree about our security. Tik Tok included,
I'm really surprised you posted something so ignorant when a 2 second search will refute this EVERY time income taxes have been lowered. Lowering income taxes generates more revenue. Every time.
This is why the left should be in charge of nothing significant.
Only in Biden's America! If Trump were president this innocent man wouldn't be going to jail. He's just a poor guy who took $20k from a local business owner, a dentist, and used that money to help dentists all over Arkansas! What a nice deed.
Ofc the guy he initially helped was going to give Hutchinson $150,000 because his dental practice took off and prospered. Nothing shady about that at all. Just a nice man paying it forward.
But no, in 2023 this is apparently a bribe.
Given his fetish for pedophilia and desire to bring harm to Sawnee's granddaughter, i wouldn't get my hopes up.
The enemy of my enemy ...
And contrary to (bought and paid for) China Joe, they are an adversary of the US.
This part is funny too as the entitled and politically connected class has it so rough after their innocent white-collar crimes of course.
Hey man, I'm not disagreeing. Companies paying lower taxes make more in revenue. You're right.
I'm talking about the government. They gotta pay their bills somehow and balance the budget! They can only cut so much and after that who know what'll happen!
https://www.investopedia.com/articl...overnment revenues,income tax and payroll tax.
And this is coming from someone who's been a republican for the past 6 mo. Pops passed away from that damn booster.
Sure he was in his 70s, smoked and was obese and had cancer but it was definitely the shot.
Also, appreciate your transparency erasing everything I said and just pasting one sentence to make it come across as something else.
Always thought the right were the honest ones but I guess there are some bad apples.
Last edited:
How it should've gone:
US: Hey Xi, good news. We found your missing balloon.
Xi: Ah, barroon for wedder. Yes, wedder onry.
US: Yea, no sweat. We just shot it down for you and will drop it off in Beijing via express mail. Nah, you don't have to thank us. You're welcome.
Xi: Ah, no. Wedder. China need news on wedder...
US: <click>
Last edited:
You’re a f’ing clown Jimcrobo32
Sorry about your pops. I am very serious on that. I can completely relate to you.
(BTW, I know I'm right ... it is a burden i must carry lol)
Hope you're serious about converting to Pub; you're usually relatively smrt. That is why i was disappointed in your post. The post, BTW, that I directly quoted, was the lead of the paragraph. That was the part that caught my eye, the rest of the post was drivel and I wasn't interested in it and didn't want to clog the thread further. If you're going to join us on the right, you gotta develop thicker skin my friend.
I'm sure they have that next virus que'd up and ready for release...
Thx man, you as well.
That specific point was again referring to government revenue not corporate.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/07/tax_cuts.asp#:~:text=Tax cuts reduce government revenues,income tax and payroll tax.
summary of resource
"Tax cuts reduce government revenues and create either a budget deficit or increased sovereign debt. Critics often argue that the tax cut benefits the rich at the expense of those with fewer resources as services beneficial to those in a lower income bracket are cut. Proponents claim that cuts put money in consumers' pockets and spending increases, growing the economy"
To be the party of fiscal responsibility, as Republicans are, they need to truly look at this. They cannot be serious about balancing the budget solely through cuts.
Ofc I'm in favor of said Cuts, specifically payroll taxes. Larger paychecks for all. We're already paying over 7.5%, 15% if you count the employer contribution. Bigger checks is something I can get behind.
Sure it would gut some social programs but I'm more confident in Wall Street than the government and this can be seen through the historical stock market average of 7 to 10% a year depending on which indices you use. Social Security, on the other hand, hardly goes up at all.
I trust the average American to be wise with their larger paychecks and that's something I think we, as a nation, should agree on.
I directly quoted the law itself. Not any media coverage. You can’t blame the press for what the law literally says.
What do you consider yourself? Do you claim to be a moderate while posting MTG tweets?
Gov revenue increases after taxes are lowered. Left-leaning economists do not like that truth, but when people have more money, they spend it, save it, or give it away*. All 3 help the economy and create further revenue, which is taxed again. Lowering taxes provides incentive to invest or grow income as well. Then gov revenues go up, every time serious tax reduction is tried.
Let me know if you agree with this: it isn't JUST "bigger checks". It is keeping my money ... what I earned through my hard work, patience and perseverance.
* when people are more generous, the NEED for social programs go down. Politicians from the Uniparty do not like that, because they're addicted to OPM.
The last point ... I will agree with part of that completely. (ha) I think most Americans make shi!tty decisions with their money BUUUTTT they make better decisions for themselves than greedy Pols will make for them. If you're talking about people and their decisions vs SS, then yes I agree. Just look at Galveston.
Later, gotta run.
EDIT: I forgot ... businesses do not pay "corporate income taxes". Customers of business pay income taxes. So whoever buys something from a business is the one actually paying the corporate income tax. It is a shame how bad our economic education is today.
Last edited:
Happy to see Cats run out and get that 3 by CJ. You know Cal was screaming for them to hold for last shot of half.
GA is lucky to have someone like MTG. She's a true representation of our great nation and adherent follower of not only the Constitution but of our God's Law, the 10 Comandments, especially the 7th.
If only those currently in the White House followed his law as good as she.
Lastly, she's hilarious which is great especially in these dark times.
I don't think this is fair. The guy on the right has dementia and doesn't know Xi is his boss. Then again maybe Xi is telling 46 he's Hunter.
All in China. They’re all about themselves but they have allied with Russia buddy. Argue it all you want it is what it is
WSJ News Exclusive | China Aids Russia’s War in Ukraine, Trade Data Shows
Despite international sanctions, Chinese state-owned companies are shipping navigation equipment, jamming technology and fighter-jet parts to Russian government-owned companies, customs records show.
www.wsj.com
Weird that pandemics happen on about a 100 year cycle but the experts are sure that we are going to have another one in a few years.... LOL.
Yeah, you said the same things 20 times. 🤦♂️
Somebody hates Christians. What are the Marxist missionaries up to these days?
To be fair that kid going to that island would be like us going to Ukraine with the intent to convince the Russians to end the war. Wouldn't end well for any of us.
The Sentinelese have no concept of Christianity so it wasn't necessarily hate from their end. Nor is is hate from @Dionysus444 , more so the kid wanted that Darwin Award and boy oh boy did he earn it!
As for the Marxist missionaries, they're spreading the good word of how entitlements are great for people. Gotta help those in need, the downtrodden. Love thy neighbor and all.
At least that's what they want you to believe.
I think you mean love thy government. Marxists don’t love their neighbors. And, they are not charitable.
Technically speaking both sides of the aisle are charitable which makes sense because the U.S. is one of the most charitable countries on the planet.
R's are slightly more charitable with 72% of them donating to 68% for D's. My guess would be because R's are more religious.
Just because D's are an opposing party doesn't mean they're not charitable.
Remember, it's not good to make blanket statements about a group of people just because those at the top are sketchy.
I know people of both ideologies who've donated or served their communities. One can care for others regardless of party.
Those who cannot are just sad individuals.
I say this as someone whose family is a mix of both. Mom and brother D's, late pops R. Shoot I live in a sea of blue, volunteer at a church and politics never comes up. We're there to serve.
If I let the fact that most of those volunteers are likely left leaning and chose to not volunteer there because of that then it would not be a good look especially in a church of all places.
Added:
Not all Democrats are Marxist just like not all Republicans are fascist. Those that have that belief are a lost cause.
Remember, it should be country/community first, party second. Those that value their party over everything else are again a lost cause.
With that being said, it's time to crash. Gotta get up early.
Similar threads
