ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
I'm not for MM for Prez.

Please explain why no one can beat MM for Pub Senate Leader (This ought to be good.)? Where's the great Rand Paul? Rick Scott? Ted Cruz? Surely someone must be better than MM according to you & just about everyone else here. But no, they are all hiding in the corner while MM stands up & takes the shots.

Reminds me:

"The record shows I took the blows
And did it my way
Yes, it was my way"
There is nothing impressive about your belief that everyone who does not love Mitch like you love Mitch can be placed into some stereotypical box.

But, that is what makes you the Mitchophant.
 
The great VDH:

"Rather than offering detailed correctives for Biden's disastrous record, Trump is again dabbling in social media madness. He needlessly floated the absurd idea that constitutional norms might need to be changed to allow the disputed 2020 election result to be overturned.

He seems oblivious that the Left, not conservatives, talk of altering the Constitution. They call for the destruction of the Electoral College, and wish to dilute the Second Amendment and redefine the First.

Why did Trump need to descend into personal invective when prior to the midterms, many primary polls were confirming his front-runner status?

Why did he not remain magnanimous, unite the party, and focus on giving millions to his endorsed but endangered candidates like Dr. Mehmet Oz, Blake Masters, and Herschel Walker?

Why did Trump bizarrely claim that possible presidential rival candidate Glenn Youngkin's name sounded "Chinese"? What was the logic of attacking Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's, R-Ky., wife in racialist terms?

..... there is only one rule concerning antisemites: Go nowhere near them. Yet Trump dined with two, the now unhinged Kanye West ("Ye") and the 20-something crackpot Nick Fuentes.

Why would Trump all but announce before the midterms that after the election he would be a candidate?
Or why right before November 8, did Trump attack Ron DeSantis (whom he calls "DeSanctimonious"), the miracle-worker Republican governor of Trump's own Florida? Did Trump wish to rile up left-wing Trump-haters to rush to the midterm polls, or to persuade miffed conservative DeSantis voters to stay home?

In the impending Trump-DeSantis collision, voters will be looking for resolution of two respective unknowns.
One, will Trump run on his stellar record, avoid controversy, and stick to the issues? And will he thereby win back independent, swing voters on assurances that they could get more MAGA successes, but this time around without the insults and spats? And two, could DeSantis assure Republicans of a fire-in-the belly, Trumpian zeal to take on the Left, while soberly promoting a MAGA agenda -- and thus win over the hard-core Trump base?

So far, De Santis is reassuring donors and primary voters he can be as tough as his record is impressive.
But Trump is not encouraging the donor class and independent voters that he has learned that melodramas and social media riffs are not his friends."
So this is the 4th post you've made about Trump since you said Trump supporters were obsessed and emotional... Stop already...

Let-go.gif
 
They changed gender to mean whatever the hell you want.

They call the baby a fetus to dehumanize the baby if they want to abort, even post birth (see Ralph Northam).
Gender-the male sex or the female sex, especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones, or one of a range of other identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.

Fetus-an offspring of a human or other mammal in the stages of prenatal development that follow the embryo stage (in humans taken as beginning eight weeks after conception)

Simple google search will help your understanding immensely
 
The great VDH:

"Rather than offering detailed correctives for Biden's disastrous record, Trump is again dabbling in social media madness. He needlessly floated the absurd idea that constitutional norms might need to be changed to allow the disputed 2020 election result to be overturned.

He seems oblivious that the Left, not conservatives, talk of altering the Constitution. They call for the destruction of the Electoral College, and wish to dilute the Second Amendment and redefine the First.

Why did Trump need to descend into personal invective when prior to the midterms, many primary polls were confirming his front-runner status?

Why did he not remain magnanimous, unite the party, and focus on giving millions to his endorsed but endangered candidates like Dr. Mehmet Oz, Blake Masters, and Herschel Walker?

Why did Trump bizarrely claim that possible presidential rival candidate Glenn Youngkin's name sounded "Chinese"? What was the logic of attacking Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's, R-Ky., wife in racialist terms?

..... there is only one rule concerning antisemites: Go nowhere near them. Yet Trump dined with two, the now unhinged Kanye West ("Ye") and the 20-something crackpot Nick Fuentes.

Why would Trump all but announce before the midterms that after the election he would be a candidate?
Or why right before November 8, did Trump attack Ron DeSantis (whom he calls "DeSanctimonious"), the miracle-worker Republican governor of Trump's own Florida? Did Trump wish to rile up left-wing Trump-haters to rush to the midterm polls, or to persuade miffed conservative DeSantis voters to stay home?

In the impending Trump-DeSantis collision, voters will be looking for resolution of two respective unknowns.
One, will Trump run on his stellar record, avoid controversy, and stick to the issues? And will he thereby win back independent, swing voters on assurances that they could get more MAGA successes, but this time around without the insults and spats? And two, could DeSantis assure Republicans of a fire-in-the belly, Trumpian zeal to take on the Left, while soberly promoting a MAGA agenda -- and thus win over the hard-core Trump base?

So far, De Santis is reassuring donors and primary voters he can be as tough as his record is impressive.
But Trump is not encouraging the donor class and independent voters that he has learned that melodramas and social media riffs are not his friends."
Assume you’re quoting Victor Davis Hanson(?). You have a link for that?
 
Gender-the male sex or the female sex, especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones, or one of a range of other identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.

Fetus-an offspring of a human or other mammal in the stages of prenatal development that follow the embryo stage (in humans taken as beginning eight weeks after conception)

Simple google search will help your understanding immensely
I know what they changed it to mean. I wasn't born yesterday. They're rewriting everything to support the progressive ideology.
 
DeSantis could not flip it and he doesn't want to. The State Legislature changed it and it is permanent now. This was not an executive order it was legislation.

I am not sure where you get your anti DeSantis propaganda but repeating Trump lies will not serve your side well in 2024.

Trying to tie DeSantis to the establishment is laughable.
The Levislature passed it on Desantis’ direction, are you suggesting they wouldn’t remove it as well?
He quite literally stated in the past week he would be willing to look at it again, right after Iger returned to Disney.

For fairness I edited this, the legislature in Florida said they would be willing to take a look at Reedy Creek now that Iger was back.
 
Last edited:
I know what they changed it to mean. I wasn't born yesterday. They're rewriting everything to support the progressive ideology.
The concept of gender being different than sex has been around for decades. Just because you took them to mean the exact same thing, doesn’t mean that there’s some big conspiracy to change the meaning of gender.
 
The Levislature passed it on Desantis’ direction, are you suggesting they wouldn’t remove it as well?
He quite literally stated in the past week he would be willing to look at it again, right after Iger returned to Disney.
I don't get why people think Iger is less woke that Chapek. Iger was the guy leading the co when it went down this woke path. M she U and 'The Force is Female' both started under Iger. The current batch of huge failures started their productions under Iger.... movies don't go from idea to theatre in a year.

Iger is just trying to be subtle about it. He was just at a co meeting and what he said leads me to believe he has no intention of changing from woke politics.

He was the one that ran off all the talent at Pixar.
 
The concept of gender being different than sex has been around for decades. Just because you took them to mean the exact same thing, doesn’t mean that there’s some big conspiracy to change the meaning of gender.

Cmon @IdaCat were getting educated here.

It’s kinda like asking for a large coffee at Starbucks and they act like they don’t know what you mean unless you say “grande”
 
The concept of gender being different than sex has been around for decades. Just because you took them to mean the exact same thing, doesn’t mean that there’s some big conspiracy to change the meaning of gender.
I've been around decades too and there was never more than M/F options on any form or software application I've written that asked for the input of the term. The social psuedo-science regressives have taken it to what it is today. Now the feds are f**king up all kinds of systems requiring infinite value lists for data entry just to appease you idiots.
 
I've been around decades too and there was never more than M/F options on any form or software application I've written that asked for the input of the term. The social psuedo-science regressives have taken it to what it is today. Now the feds are f**king up all kinds of systems requiring infinite value lists for data entry just to appease you idiots.

Healthcare software the same way. Hell I don’t even know what they’re talking about with half that stuff. So ridiculous.
 
Mortgage rates falling back down. GDP going up. Gas back under $3. oil in freefall. Stock Market climbing. Inflation falling. Jobs booming. wages booming Senate control secured. Biden just wins and wins and wins!
I hope you are paid well for having to type out these posts...that even you dont really believe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdlUK.1
If they did a basic background check most of these people wouldn't get hired in government. This dude is clearly mentally ill. I've seen 2 speeches he's given and he's F'd up in the head.

None of these hires are based on qualifications. Just meant to be shocking and to give the majority of the country the finger. Stuff like this has Obama’s fingerprints all over it.
 
I've been around decades too and there was never more than M/F options on any form or software application I've written that asked for the input of the term. The social psuedo-science regressives have taken it to what it is today. Now the feds are f**king up all kinds of systems requiring infinite value lists for data entry just to appease you idiots.
Probably because it wasn’t until recently that pockets of society have been more accepting of including different terms than just M/F. Biological sex is one argument because that is what are you considered when you are born but gender is much more than just the M/F binary.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Caveman Catfan
Men can wear lipstick? No way!

Sorry. I’m old school. God created man and woman. Men act like men. Women act like women. If that makes me (insert current woke bigot label) then so be it.

The progressive trend is cyclic. It’s occurred since the beginning of time until societal collapse and then men have to go back to being men and women, women. Rinse and repeat.

Nothing new under the sun, it’s just the modern version of the same thing.
 
Sorry. I’m old school. God created man and woman. Men act like men. Women act like women. If that makes me (insert current woke bigot label) then so be it.

The progressive trend is cyclic. It’s occurred since the beginning of time until societal collapse and then men have to go back to being men and women, women. Rinse and repeat.

Nothing new under the sun, it’s just the modern version of the same thing.
👍…rad
 
America is so racist that when a man who does nothing and a black woman who brings weed to a foreign airport are held in detention abroad and a dictator gives you a choice of which one you want in exchange for the world's biggest arms dealer that's contributed to endless death. You immediately pick the one that's openly stated she hates the country.

But 400 yrs ago in 1619 or something
 
Mortgage rates falling back down. GDP going up. Gas back under $3. oil in freefall. Stock Market climbing. Inflation falling. Jobs booming. wages booming Senate control secured. Biden just wins and wins and wins!
30 year fixed still above 6% after getting close to 7% and started the year slightly above 3%. Are you seriously applauding Biden because rates have fallen from 7 to 6%. Good grief!!! And Biden was the damn cause of inflation to begin with. I mean seriously, you ****ing people are complete morons. I can’t even read this shit because it reminds me of the ****ing idiots I have to share this world with.
 
America is so racist that when a man who does nothing and a black woman who brings weed to a foreign airport are held in detention abroad and a dictator gives you a choice of which one you want in exchange for the world's biggest arms dealer that's contributed to endless death. You immediately pick the one that's openly stated she hates the country.

But 400 yrs ago in 1619 or something
So you take the release of a famous woman who happens to be black as a slight to white people? Interesting take
 
Sex - biological and physiological characteristics such as reproductive organs, chromosomes, hormones, etc.
Gender - social characteristics such as roles, behaviors, identities, etc.

Hope this helps a little 😁
If sex and biology are different, then why do so many ppl rush to change their sex to match their biology? If they were born that way is essentially the argument, then it falls short every time. And why do they have to change anything to align to an evil patriarchial concept?
 
If sex and biology are different, then why do so many ppl rush to change their sex to match their biology? If they were born that way is essentially the argument, then it falls short every time. And why do they have to change anything to align to an evil patriarchial concept?
Sex and biology aren’t different, I literally said that sex was the term used to describe biology. They change their gender which is a social term. Some people may go through different procedures for their sex to match their gender but frankly, it’s expensive and some people may not view it as necessary if they choose to feel that way. They can change what they want because they have the freedom to do so
 
Democrats in the 1860s are not the same democrats now. the ideology has completely changed over the past 150 years believe it or not. Democrats in the 1860s were trying to keep policies and laws about slavery the way they had always been, obviously a more conservative view of thinking. Republicans were the ones trying to abolish slavery, create change, obviously a more liberal view of thinking. The titles have basically changed so while yes, Democrats were the ones trying to uphold slavery, they are more equated to the Republican conservatives of today
You believe some ridiculous crap. What you posted here is an all out assault on truth and history. The Dem's are and have always been the racists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PhDcat2018
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT