Lol. The ONLY entity that has been caught with their hands in the cookie jar is obummers DOJ. caught hacking Georgias files. Good thing Georgia has better security than Clinton.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Lol. The ONLY entity that has been caught with their hands in the cookie jar is obummers DOJ. caught hacking Georgias files. Good thing Georgia has better security than Clinton.
Long distance dedication to our leftist friends.I woke up drunk and see this.
Not saying it's Russians, but it's Russians
I couldn't care less if you were raised in a Nazi camp in the Appalachians. If you really were. Stop with the pm's threatening kids. Now quit talking to me pinhead.
A total 180 from what you have said in earlier post. Regardless, you missed the play on words there anyway.
Perfect point on why you guys lost the election this time. You really have no clue of what you are saying and or speak out of both ends of your mouths.
So less white people and more 3rd world foreigners who disrespect the Constitution and care nothing for the country is progressive? Progressing towards what? Being Mexico lite? A 3rd world banana Republic with no rule of law? Enlighten me as to where this so called progress leads.
Last edited:
Pretty sure his point was that it isn't progressive so your question is off base.
Pretty sure that is progressive in generally accepted political nomenclature. But fine. Any discussions about a changing voting base that will inevitably be more liberal?
But you also made a statement within your question. You said the changing of demographics inevitably going to make the country more progressive. I'm asking how? What about that scenario = progress to you? What exactly is the country progressing towards?
Unfortunately, the definition of progressive to the left seems to mean anything that is not rooted in this countries constitution. Everything is bad from the past and we must embrace a whole new idea. The problem with that is, most of our old ideas are rooted in sound and solid principles which if taken out will be our eventual undoing. Many on the left who embrace the idea of socialism are progressives and feel this is the better system. Little do they realize that not only will they lose a lot of their freedoms, they will also lose a lot of their free time because they will actually have to work for what they are getting now. Bummer.
Um, I guess we can discuss that as well. Any reason you can't just answer my question regarding the discussions first?
I wasn't really asking for an editorial about its merits. Just wondered if there had been any discussions about its' inevitability.
How is adding people from 3rd world shit holes that are regressive considered progressive? You're basically saying adding more and more of those people is progressive to our country, but if our country slowly continues to become more similar to the regressive countries that they come from, then wouldn't that be regressing?
Yeah, I'll answer it. Yes, there's been talk about it, and it was given the same answer I'm giving you now. That it's not progressive, but instead regressive.
Then the discussion utilized a lot of non sequitur, just like your answers now.
Because the question is based on a false narrative that it is somehow progressive. You want a logical answer, then asked a question based on truth.
No, you disagree how I used one word. I said use whatever word you want. It's still a simple question.
I believe the 2016 has help show that nothing in politics are inevitable.
Edit to add: to answer your question. Yes.
But you were not looking for a one word answer were you? If so, let's move on to the next topic.
It's not me disagreeing with how you use one word. Your one word is false. It's a fact that it's not progressive. In what world is a 1st world country moving backwards, becoming more and more similar to a 3rd world country considered progressive?
I'll be happy to answer your simple question as soon as you reword it and not try to base it on a completely false narrative.
LOL, yes. You believing it's false is disagreeing with the word. It's a real word. I looked it up and every thing.
Moe - The problem in arguing with progressives/liberals, and the reason I now generally decline to do so is that the liberal PREMISE is a fundamental mis-ordering of the virtues. This is not me talking out my posterior...see moral matrix link here.
There are several virtues. For example, there is "honor", "Humility", "Generosity". Further, one can sensibly argue that there is a hierarchy of virtue. It is a virtue to be honest, and a virtue to be kind. However the world often puts us in the position where the virtue of honesty clashes with the virtue of kindness. "Do these jeans make my butt look big?" The net sum of suffering in the world often depends on our ability to correctly judge the hierarchy of virtue. Put this in perspective: 20 million people died in the Stalinist purges and 30 million in the Cultural Revolution, both events were driven by the single minded premise that equality-of-outcome was the most important virtue of a society.
So here is the problem. Progressives neither recognize a long list of virtues, nor the potential conflicts between them. They recognize two, and only two, closely associated ones that I will label loosely as "Caring and Sharing". Because only "Care" and "Fair" are the highest of the holies, nothing else matters, not justice, not liberty, not honesty, nor anything smacking "measure and proportion". Indeed, if you look at all the crazy-ass left wing moon-battery that has become so very common in the last 25 years, from political correctness to zero tolerance to whatever else you want to name, you will see that it all makes really perfectly logical sense IF "Caring" and "Fair" are the only things with which you are really concerned. Thus, discourse is useless and we are now seeing this in full living color in Congress and Senate where Dems and Pubs have become absolutely incapable of talking to each other. We even see in the perversion of the language, most predominately in the studied confabulation of "Rights" and "Privileges" and in the confabulation of "Fairness" and "Justice".
The understanding of virtues is of deadly importance because getting it approximately right is what allows a society to maintain itself in a healthy condition through time. Look at the collapse of all great societies and you see either abandonment of virtue (Rome) or what I've discussed above (France after the 1600's).
Last edited:
Hmmm...that's a very specific accusation you're making there hoss. Tell me more about these alleged pm's. Why haven't you produced an example yet?
I'd say who cares if the country is more diverse as long as the people being brought here want to assimilate, accept and respect American culture and values, strive to become American and contribute positively to society, are ultimately here for freedom and a better life, and are not here just to live off the government/taxpayers and get free stuff.
I think most on this thread are just conservative in an arguably reasonable sort of way. There are two or three though that are living-on-a-compound angry. Not flaming, but I truly wonder how those two or three root for a basketball team with black players.
We are angry because scumbags like you are trying to destroy the country. Luckily your ilk got its ass kicked about a month ago. Lmao the race card? You're a joke, but keep using it so we can keep smoking you guys in future elections please.
These are very serious things you are accusing him of saying/doing. Since you seem to be ignoring him, I'll ask for him. Will you produce these pm's?
You can't just accuse him of something like this, blast him on a public forum about it, then act like you never did. Thanks.
LOL, he accused me of inviting boys to my home you hypocrite. Quit being a fraud and show some integtrity. I'm not engaging anymore about what he has said. Believe what you want to believe. I have him on ignore.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
How do we get the Elam Ending in C. Basketball?- Latest: docholiday51
-