I've seen enough of your post in this thread to know you should be a commentator for CNN. That's all I'm sayin. Sorry for the name calling.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
I've seen enough of your post in this thread to know you should be a commentator for CNN. That's all I'm sayin. Sorry for the name calling.
I don't trust my computer when I plug my phone in and it asks me "do you want to trust this computer" NO F No.
CNN, bastion of libertarianism and limited government. I can't go five minutes watching it without someone blabbing on about cutting the budget, lowering taxes, deregulating huge swaths of the economy, decriminalizing victimless acts, shoring up property rights, absolutism on the 1st and 2nd Amendments (and really all of them).I've seen enough of your post in this thread to know you should be a commentator for CNN. That's all I'm sayin. Sorry for the name calling.
Yep, I'd fit right in.
Just a little off there hoss, he did mention pot. He was asked about it and he said he would leave that up to the states.
For everything Trump has said, you can find him saying damn near the exact opposite. I'm not saying it's likely he goes one way or another. I'm saying there is no way to tell and my fear is that it goes the way I mentioned. Like I said, appointing someone like Christie or Rudy COULD be an indication of what path he takes.
If Hillary won and was choosing between Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren for Secretary of Commerce would you not assume that was designed to implement a certain strategy? Or at least play to a certain crowd. Even if she made comments attacking Bernie's economic ideas previously?
Talk is he is pretty pissed at Christie because of the bridgegate drama. It's looking more and more like Rudy is going to be SoS rather than AG.
I get what you're saying and agree when it comes to that group of people. Maybe I am naive and want/hope things will be different. I just have this feeling that this time, change will actually be real and positive for the majority of Americans. I will take our new P.O.T.U.S.and his staffs word until the prove otherwise.
All this said, if Trump appoints Michelle Rhee as Secretary of Education I will wear a MAGA hat for at least a day
The following is not related to any specific issue but as a general reference to Trump's Presidency. For the past 20 years we've grown accustomed to basing every decision on what is best for "X" party. It's an assumption, not a consideration.
This may be naive, but.....Trump is more of an outsider than anyone in the past 30 years. He has his own wealth and does not seem to be defined by his political standing. He took less money and would seem to be less beholden to powerful third party entities. He fought the Dems, he was up against the media and even his own party didn't full support him.
My hope is that he simply brushes aside political party considerations and forces decisions through based on what's best for the country. Not on what's going to influence any particular party, but what really should be done. Probably naive, but one can always hope.
I'm right there with ya. I hope that is how things play out. I guess my question was more about the parties and the people and less about the Trump administration.
If he were able to boost the economy, create REAL jobs, and ease racial tension...wouldn't that all have a negative affect on the Democratic party? He could possibly take a way a lot of their base if he could do those things. All they would have left to run on is abortion and guns.
Get a strong coalition of people-chopper-uppers and present to the DNC as a way to swing FL.
![[thumb2]](https://ct.yimg.com/mr/uploads/891/1684387.png "Thumbs Up 2 [thumb2]")
Think about what you posted.....right back to the old party win/lose scenario. (I'm not taking issue, just pointing out how ingrained party politics are with everyone.)
Dems better go back and retrieve their base. The lunch pail workers.
Yes, but it's real. I'm not saying it right, but it's how things are. You have a room full of liberal elitist meeting in D.C. for the next several days planning their next move. Currently they have a lot of talking points and things that can sway voters. If things play out right, Trump can take away a lot of those talking points. Hell, maybe he can completely change politics, but I think that's a stretch. We just need him to pull a lot of voters away from the progressive side.
Sounds like President Obama thinks that a Predsident Trump won't able to undue all his Executive Orders.
I don't want Trump or his administration to spend one second worrying about how a decision is going to sway or pull voters. I hope they look at every decision based on what's right for this country. Period.
WAY too many decisions have been made on what's best for one party or the other. F' that line of thinking. (And once again, I'm sure this line of thought is very naive and way too hopeful.)
Well yeah, Obama had a super special secret phone and pen! Trump can't have Obama's super secret special phone and pen....that's what Michelle told him anyway.
If Trump gets assassinated we get Mike Pence.
That would make the LGBT folks heads explode.
I knew what you were saying and I agree with it. I'm tired of being a spectator in the Rep vs Dem political game.
I saw that movie: its called "Purge" lol
Don't you know, his last executive order was that you couldn't rescind executive orders.
![[cheers]](https://ct.yimg.com/mr/uploads/891/5628.gif "Cheers [cheers]")
Didn't you know he spelled it "resend" and then immediately violated his own EO with an email to Clinton's private server?
Going to tough on the next President with Obama still living in the DC area Looking over and criticizing with the help of the Press, every decision that is made by Trump.
Most Presidents in the past have not been critical of the next administration when they leave office. Pretty much an unwritten rule IMO...you did your job...let them do their's.
How many on here said when Obama was elected, he's not my President?
you are talking former Republican Presidents not Democrats.
Great.
so Obama is staying in the DC area? lol Not surprised at all. It's his own personal Utopia.
But I do see him being that shitty gossip neighbor that won't STFU about other people's business.
so Obama is staying in the DC area? lol Not surprised at all. It's his own personal Utopia.
But I do see him being that shitty gossip neighbor that won't STFU about other people's business.
With Michelle egging Obama on.
Michelle" Barak, you gonna be a pussy boi and let that man get away with that. You're no man. You know who's a real man? That Jay-Z. He's a real man"
Michelle" Barak, you gonna be a pussy boi and let that man get away with that. You're no man. You know who's a real man? That Jay-Z. He's a real man"
Last edited:
Of course Obama is going to stay in Washington. Foreign dictators, large banks, billionaires, etc. aren't going to be paying for his "eloquent speeches" if he get's out of the power and influence game.
Not even the Paddock would go this far. Mercy!
https://www.yahoo.com/news/official-west-virginia-leave-racist-obama-post-132100329.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/official-west-virginia-leave-racist-obama-post-132100329.html
Apparently Hillary was drunk and extremely combative on election night. lol
The Michelle Obama looks like a gorilla discussion, and bannings, happened in July 2016.
Similar threads
