Vague tradition??Why? I'd argue it's far more "decent" to not discriminate than to protect some sense of vague tradition you can't even name or justify.
You mean like ALL of humanity until, like 15 minutes ago??
You cannot be serious.
Vague tradition??Why? I'd argue it's far more "decent" to not discriminate than to protect some sense of vague tradition you can't even name or justify.
Not sure why the website says you quoted me wrt this post?Musta missed the part where Iran was in the middle of bombing a democracy into the stone age during the first massive land war in Europe since WW2.
Your comparing a government policy shift to an active proxy World War.
Apples to oranges.... Actually apples to carburators but nice attempt at a completely illogical whataboutism.
Why is this even news? Who cares about Smith and Rock or anyone else in Hollywoodhaha
False. Give it 48 hours and this "study" will be debunked.
Jaysus 6 hours, I had no idea. That’s lunacy.1) 10-12k roughly
2) 200-350 miles roughly
3) up to 6 hours roughly. Depending.
4) you're screwed.
5) nope.
Absolute nonsense on absolutely every level. At this point in time.
Explain to me what problems could potentially arise. Single-use? Sure. As they exist now? Okay. No convincing you if you think that would work.You're barking up the wrong tree, I think bathrooms should be unisex. Segregation is dumb. Equality.
Between forced vaccine mandates and all the woke bs, it's no wonder.https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...s-numbers-in-face-of-recruiting-difficulties/
The Army this week admitted it was having problems recruiting and announced an unprecedented reduction in its numbers that would shrink the active duty Army to its smallest size since World War II.
“We’re facing, obviously, some challenging conditions in terms of our ability to recruit and attract talent,” Under Secretary of the Army Gabe Camarillo said at a press conference on Monday.
So who wants to start ww3?
But some idiots still support china joeThe amount of outright lies in the press release was incredible. Stating that gender reassignment in minors leads to better outcomes both physically and mentally is in contrast to pretty much every single article I've read on the subject from a variety of sources. Subjecting an individual who is not old enough to legally make many other decisions (drive, drink, run for office, serve in the military, buy cigarettes, get married, have sex, enter into a contract, etc.) to a lifetime of ongoing hormone therapy because of some limited time in their development someone brainwashed them to think they were born 'wrong' is abominable.
It certainly seems like Joe is bound and determined to get the US into a war, crash the economy, kill the fossil fuel industry and, now, make sure Democrats lose damn near every seat in Congress with dumb*ss policies like this. How many thousands of children will be harmed by this? Do the Dems just not give a damn? I know politicians on both sides only care about getting elected/reelected and how much money they can accumulate from the public, but, contrary to the announcement, this IS child abuse. Screwing up a kid for the rest of their life because of some political agenda is criminal.
And also, what if the vast majority of society STRENUOUSLY objects to such an arrangement?You're barking up the wrong tree, I think bathrooms should be unisex. Segregation is dumb. Equality.
China Joe is letting me down on this issue, but he’s just doing what the Democratic Party demands he do. Very disappointed, but I’ve learned that it will be the citizens that save our country, not the politicians. Vote. Protest. Get involved. That’s how we will make it.But some idiots still support china joe
Give the Russkies a couple days to come up with something huh? lmfaoFalse. Give it 48 hours and this "study" will be debunked.
Call out #19. Do you condemn any democrat pedos and/or groomers?False. Give it 48 hours and this "study" will be debunked.
And the people leaving are likely the bad ass ground pounders and the people staying have multiple pronouns.Between forced vaccine mandates and all the woke bs, it's no wonder.
Men being told that in one or two areas, they have to stay men is not QUITE on the same level as black people being hosed down in the streets.I mean that's what we're doing, having the conversation. I in no way think that my position is the popular or majority one. But that doesn't inherently make it wrong.
"I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White citizens’ “Councilor” or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can’t agree with your methods of direst action” who paternistically feels that he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection."
Obviously not like a mandate to do it nationally tomorrow. We're only starting to have this conversation as these issues gain more visibility. Lots of offices and things have unisex bathrooms, it isn't some insane idea.Explain to me what problems could potentially arise. Single-use? Sure. As they exist now? Okay. No convincing you if you think that would work.
Then it won't ever happen. That's kinda how democracy works. Can "the vast majority of society STRENUOUSLY object" to anything right now? The "vast majority" don't really seem united on much of anything.And also, what if the vast majority of society STRENUOUSLY objects to such an arrangement?
Of course it isn't. But that doesn't make the insight in the quote any less applicable.Men being told that in one or two areas, they have to stay men is not QUITE on the same level as black people being hosed down in the streets.
Russia? Really? What, are you stuck in 2016??Give the Russkies a couple days to come up with something huh? lmfao
What about exposing their penis in a girl’s locker room in front of 18-22 year old women? That’s cool right? I’m sure that wouldn’t make the women uncomfortable at all right?Anyone pulling their penis out in front of a 9 yr old in a women's restroom would be arrested. Women's restrooms don't have urinals.
I can see us not wanting to go to war over the origin of the pandemic being a U.S.-funded lab
What about exposing their penis in a girl’s locker room in front of 18-22 year old women? That’s cool right? I’m sure that wouldn’t make the women uncomfortable at all right?
Or...it doesn’t matter if 30 girls are uncomfortable as long as one trans person is happy. Is that the deal?
https://nypost.com/2022/01/27/teamm...ker-room-with-trans-upenn-swimmer-lia-thomas/
Sorry-ideology is at stake here. Remember, right and wrong are dictated ONLY by the party you follow.What about exposing their penis in a girl’s locker room in front of 18-22 year old women? That’s cool right? I’m sure that wouldn’t make the women uncomfortable at all right?
Or...it doesn’t matter if 30 girls are uncomfortable as long as one trans person is happy. Is that the deal?
https://nypost.com/2022/01/27/teamm...ker-room-with-trans-upenn-swimmer-lia-thomas/
Not juvenile at all. Ask any woman about that. It's infantile that your communist mind can't comprehend a very simple real world example.When these are the lengths you have to go to defend your position you know you're flailing. "What if her poop stinks?!?!?!" Juvenile.
Or how about when a girl got raped by a boy in a skirt in VA and the school covers it up to not upset transgender advocates... so they move the boy in a skirt to another school and he rapes another girl. Does that do anything for you are you just gonna push it off until someone rapes your daughter in a bathroom?
Somebody better pay for giving it to queen Elizabeth then
You're wrong it has nothing to do with party, but you're right everything to do with ideology. Mine is that we're all human and all these taboos and mores around biological activity are archaic. What's yours?Sorry-ideology is at stake here. Remember, right and wrong are dictated ONLY by the party you follow.
imagine all the ppl who are now taking their 4th shot of experimental gene therapies in one year and still doesn't work to stop anything? imagine all the ppl that have died and are going to die from heart issues because of forced mandating injections of experimental serums?Imagine all the rubes who have horse paste in their medicine cabinets. lmfao
You're wrong it has nothing to do with party, but you're right everything to do with ideology. What's yours?
So according to your intellectually superior ideology...a woman (of any age) having a problem with being exposed to a penis in a locker room against her will can be dismissed as simply taboo & archaic.You're wrong it has nothing to do with party, but you're right everything to do with ideology. Mine is that we're all human and all these taboos and mores around biological activity are archaic. What's yours?
Actually the Communist Party legalized homosexuality. Stalin went back later and recriminalized after he got complete control. The fascists sent them to camps. Prejudice is deeply rooted.Somebody tell Dion that in his Marxist- Leninist- Stalinist utopia of Soviet Russia they gassed the gheys. Can’t imagine what they did to trannies.