You know what is not well received, posting the same post three times in a thread.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Not sure ya'll have been paying attention, but the WEF is going to do a massive cyber attack. They will blame either China or Russia, but it will be the same people who support Obama/Hillary/Biden who did it.
The more you know
The more you know
Yeah, two tennis players at two different tourneys just had issues. Both vaxxed.
And while you're at it. Might as well spend $25,000.00 on solar panels for your home.
Paging @Platinumdrgn . The party of science strikes again!
Yeah, but in all fairness he’s not a biologist either. How would he know??
That is a primary factor. Promiscuous sex is a primary factor. The combination was lethal. Don’t be a fool to prove a point that does not have to be proven.
Monogamous people who were not sharing needles were not a high risk for aids. In fact, they were an extremely low risk for aids, regardless of sexuality. Multiple partners greatly increased the risk. Type of sex greatly increased the risk. A friend who died of aids treated aids patients before he died. He worked in his community to teach monogamy. We don’t have to deny the facts to have an adult conversation.
You are very dumb. Welcome to ignore.
-absolutely. Promiscuity was a massive issue...just saying heterosexual folks were/are less likely to contract because anal sex is the driver of aids, needle drugs as well.
You’re literally agreeing with me and calling me a fool. This is why we can’t have nice things
I will bite on this a bit. Over 3,000 years ago, Genesis 2 was written. Close to 2000 years ago, Matthew 19 was written. While culture has many different reasons to encourage ways of living, the idea of one man and one woman as an ideal has been part of some of our oldest written history.
This nomination is nowhere close to acceptable in anyway. This makes multiple times you have encouraged us in the direction of our own destruction. Are you good with light sentencing for pedophiles?
-keep the government outta marriage all together. That's the answer.
-I was/am a proponent of gay marriage. I
-didn't buy into the slippery slope argument....man/animal etc. It's silly.
-we now have a scotus nominee that says she can't define what a woman is because she isn't a biologist.
^this shit right here is a problem...it's backwards, and it isn't helping the gay community.
-I was/am a proponent of gay marriage. I
-didn't buy into the slippery slope argument....man/animal etc. It's silly.
-we now have a scotus nominee that says she can't define what a woman is because she isn't a biologist.
^this shit right here is a problem...it's backwards, and it isn't helping the gay community.
I don’t think I made a connection to divorce and gay men. Those were just two different statements. I just said a lot of gay men are promiscuous and have open marriages.
The study I linked
Promiscuity
- 28% of homosexual men had more than 1000 partners: “Bell and Weinberg reported evidence of widespread sexual compulsion among homosexual men. 83% of the homosexual men surveyed estimated they had had sex with 50 or more partners in their lifetime, 43% estimated they had sex with 500 or more partners; 28% with 1,000 or more partners. Bell and Weinberg p 308.”
That's crazy.
Curious how you think a 'slippery slope' argument is silly considering how quickly we went from "We just want to be left alone to love who we love' to drag queen story hour, trans bathrooms, guys dominating girls sports, trying to get kids to change their gender and keep parents in the dark, not to mention the increasing amount of sympathetic articles regarding pedophilia being promoted by pretty big publications?
I agree with everything else you said.
So you disagree with Darwin's theory of evolution through natural selection which is bedrock foundational scientific theory as clearly as every discipline of science can determine (paleontology, genetics, zoology, molecular biology to name a few)? You really don't want evolution taught in schools?
I have no intention of engaging in a debate of such a frivolous nature, I just want to know if you are a nut or not.
Ah... who cares.
I mean, "Supreme Court justices don't affect the lives of everyday Americans"... right, Canuck?
No offense intended, but Darwin did not explain the creation of all life. Nor can you. Unless you are a nut.
apparently Josh Hawley out there causing societal harm lol
You don’t understand the distinction between evolution and abiogenesis.
my guess, Scwab, Psaki, Hill, and Obama getting “Covid” at the same time is some form of comms
Imo it definitely tells us they were all together somewhere. If they were all together it was something they didn't want to communicate via electronic means.
One can only imagine what level of anti American plans that might be
most likely. And yeah, nothing good for America with those demons.
you know none of them got the poison vax
And people wonder why home schooling is becoming more and more popular.
-a slippery slope argument by definition is fallacious.
-I'm not sure the majority of folks that were arguing for gay marriage are on board w/ drag queen story hour/dudes winning women's sporting events.
^I'm sure there is some crossover...but this new stuff is cultural Marxism being pushed by a different(smaller) set of folks. They may be duping some well intentioned folks...but many gays/lesbians and their old school "allies" aren't on board, in spite of the narrative the media/radicals are pushing.
-that said...was same sex marriage the proverbial camels nose in the tent? Could be...but I believe there is delineation.
-I'm not sure the majority of folks that were arguing for gay marriage are on board w/ drag queen story hour/dudes winning women's sporting events.
^I'm sure there is some crossover...but this new stuff is cultural Marxism being pushed by a different(smaller) set of folks. They may be duping some well intentioned folks...but many gays/lesbians and their old school "allies" aren't on board, in spite of the narrative the media/radicals are pushing.
-that said...was same sex marriage the proverbial camels nose in the tent? Could be...but I believe there is delineation.
Who would’ve thought the 30% of Americans who feel like America is on the right track would all post in this obscure thread.
Look around, people. We are at the threshold of hell. But, sure, this ridiculous ‘anything goes’ culture we’ve created has nothing to do with it. Norms are stupid and for bigots…..says the virtue signaling moonbats as our society circles the toilet.
Congrats. You got what you wanted. How ‘bout you STFU about it now? Or is that simply asking too damn much from you?
EDIT: Sorry, to be precise it’s 27% of Americans think we are on the right path. Good work, moonbats. Keep pushing!
Look around, people. We are at the threshold of hell. But, sure, this ridiculous ‘anything goes’ culture we’ve created has nothing to do with it. Norms are stupid and for bigots…..says the virtue signaling moonbats as our society circles the toilet.
Congrats. You got what you wanted. How ‘bout you STFU about it now? Or is that simply asking too damn much from you?
EDIT: Sorry, to be precise it’s 27% of Americans think we are on the right path. Good work, moonbats. Keep pushing!
Last edited:
I'm not going to do a search, but I recollect that at the time the sanctions went into effect, many sources said it would take a while for their major effects to come into play.
Similar threads
