ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Taiwan has 258 mountain peaks at an elevation of more than 3000 meters to fight from and are riddled with pre-positioned defensive positions pre-targeted on any potential landing areas below. Think Afghanistan on steroids. A nightmare to consider invading and it is an island. You couldn't pick a worse place to try and fight anywhere on the globe. It really is, in all the world, a uniquely difficult military objective to even consider.

The littoral zone is the area and stage of conflict where Taiwan’s advantages are optimized, and where its military has the potential to be most lethal. This is where warships and fighter jets can attack the enemy with support from CDCMs, UAVs and anti-aircraft defense coverage. Taiwan’s military can conduct joint fire strikes against the PLA from air, sea and shore assets, with the full coverage of multi-layer air defense systems. Coordinating and executing successful landing operations are tremendously difficult, especially when transporting thousands of troops and heavy machinery across the Taiwan Strait. With its capabilities limited during transit, the PLA will be most vulnerable when nearing landing beaches. A layered defense of sea mines and pre-deployed obstacles along with swarming fast-attack craft and missile assault boats will hinder the enemy’s advance. As the enemy approaches landing beaches, land-based precision-guided munitions and ground forces will provide additional firepower.

Taiwan’s Overall Defense Concept, Explained


Think about China contemplating an assault they don't have the ships for to begin with, to land on beaches they can't possibly hold and are not of sufficient size and number to accommodate the number of troops they need to land, and to support a troop level they can't possibly sustain... while also wondering how they will defend against the United States Pacific Fleet.

Never going to happen. The right needs to find some other boogieman to scare their sheep with. Taiwan has smartly focused on high quality military capability sporting the latest and most advanced systems in the world. It is a hornets nest wrapped deep in well defended mountainous positions. This really is a foolish question and it amazes me the right has gotten so much traction with it from their cackling flock.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Dionysus444
Taiwan has 258 mountain peaks at an elevation of more than 3000 meters to fight from and are riddled with pre-positioned defensive positions pre-targeted on any potential landing areas below. Think Afghanistan on steroids. A nightmare to consider invading and it is an island. You couldn't pick a worse place to try and fight anywhere on the globe. It really is, in all the world, a uniquely difficult military objective to even consider.

The littoral zone is the area and stage of conflict where Taiwan’s advantages are optimized, and where its military has the potential to be most lethal. This is where warships and fighter jets can attack the enemy with support from CDCMs, UAVs and anti-aircraft defense coverage. Taiwan’s military can conduct joint fire strikes against the PLA from air, sea and shore assets, with the full coverage of multi-layer air defense systems. Coordinating and executing successful landing operations are tremendously difficult, especially when transporting thousands of troops and heavy machinery across the Taiwan Strait. With its capabilities limited during transit, the PLA will be most vulnerable when nearing landing beaches. A layered defense of sea mines and pre-deployed obstacles along with swarming fast-attack craft and missile assault boats will hinder the enemy’s advance. As the enemy approaches landing beaches, land-based precision-guided munitions and ground forces will provide additional firepower.

Taiwan’s Overall Defense Concept, Explained


Think about China contemplating an assault they don't have the ships for to begin with, to land on beaches they can't possibly hold and are not of sufficient size and number to accommodate the number of troops they need to land, and to support a troop level they can't possibly sustain... while also wondering how they will defend against the United States Pacific Fleet.

Never going to happen. The right needs to find some other boogieman to scare their sheep with. Taiwan has smartly focused on high quality military capability sporting the latest and most advanced systems in the world. It is a hornets nest wrapped deep in well defended mountainous positions. This really is a foolish question and it amazes me the right has gotten so much traction with it from their cackling flock.
China will try to Hong Kong Taiwan. A slow and methodical takeover by quietly replacing the government with CCP stooges. One day they just announce a total crackdown and see if it works. But it will be much harder because of geography, military, economics. They also need a president in place like Trump who will do nothing to stop it. Taiwan is more vulnerable to major natural disaster than they are to the CCP. It would take the entire Chinese fleet and thousands of landing craft for an invasion attempt. Its not something they can feint. Or pull a Russia and say oh we just doing exercises over here with our entire navy and million+ assembled conscripts being loaded up. I think Xi is a little smarter and restrained than Putin.
 
Last edited:
With Russia set to default by April 15th we've now entered a new period. Call it the Putin death watch.

Russia is immersed in the greatest military blunder in history. The financial loses are staggering even without the military humbling and complete loss of reputation. It is an unfolding disaster with no even mildly attractive exit signs.

Russia's best option BY FAR is to kill/replace/imprison Putin. That is the fastest way out of this. Just lay it all off on him, say he was crazy or whatever you like, but a quick Putin exit has got to be very, very attractive to a lot of dangerous people in Russia right now.

What can Putin offer in terms of an exit strategy that is more appealing than simply disappearing him? Nothing. No options out there.

So the Putin watch is on. We can conclude with high confidence at the first opportunity Putin will be out. How long can a firmly entrenched Putin last? How many people can he arrest before he slips up? His days are numbered. How many days is the only question. NOBODY walks away from a mistake like this. Nobody.
 
Best economy in our history? Lmao! You Trump slurpers are always good for a laugh.
gb3lqboxijn81.png
 
Nonsense...fauci is the master of word salad and talking over ppls heads using various things ppl won't understand so they can't ask anything back. It's also why he absolutely refuses to do interviews with anyone accept the triple mask afraid of the grocery crowd...aka his fan base.

You all have made this guy a diety when he's an infectious disease doctor...just like any other, whom many disagree with him...but that's wrong think and fauci works for the govt...so you trust him.

What's so hard with him or the cdc saying this: "we were wrong about this, or approached this particular thing wrong"

Ppl would respect him if he would do that...but he won't, he just doubles or changes definitions or whatever else.
He's not a deity. He's a scientist who has given advice on how to avoid getting sick to the best of his ability during the worst world wide pandemic in 100 years. The level of hatred on the right for him is just nuts. He's not Satan either.
 
Once again...Trump never wanted to defund nato. You keep saying this over and over. All he suggested was that the other countries Pay a percentage relative to gdp as opposed to the US paying the majority of it.

Do I need to repeat this again...bc every few days there you take off again posting the same talking point nonsense

He does this constantly. Repeats the same lies every three to four days
 
Just keep telling yourself that. Putin invaded Ukraine when? When your boy was in office. But hey, go ahead...blame Trump!
I'm not blaming Trump for Putin invading Ukraine. I said I believe he was going in no matter who the President was.
The far right is blaming Biden even though Trump sent mixed signals on his support of NATO, tried to remove 12k troops from Germany (Biden stopped that) and even withheld military aide from Ukraine to get a Biden investigation from the Ukrainian government. I'm sure Putin didn't mind any of that. The far right can't blame Biden when their guy was doing those things.
Putin saw signs of weakness in US policy under Trump and saw an old man with half the country not believing he is President in Biden (I do blame Trump for that lying BS).
Putin thought this was good timing but completely underestimated the US response, Nato's resolve, and the Ukrainian desire to be free.
Putin F'd this up long term and Russia will emerge weaker than any time since the Soviet Union's collapse if we play this right.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Bigblue2023
Trump was doing what he does, negotiating. He wanted our so called allies to pay their dues. Without us there was no NATO. Europe knows that.
He did more than just negotiate. He actually put in place a plan to remove 12,000 US troops out of Germany. Thank God Biden put a stop to that insanity. And some clowns keep acting like Trump had Putin shaking in his boots. 🤡
 
Funny.....seems to be one big name missing from Putin's sanction list. Hmmm.....wonder who that could be? Not Hillary. Not Biden.
I guess Trump has Putin so frightened he can't even put him on a meaningless sanction list. Or maybe Trump does have economic ties in Russia that Putin doesn't want to disturb. Strange indeed....
 
With Russia set to default by April 15th we've now entered a new period. Call it the Putin death watch.

Russia is immersed in the greatest military blunder in history. The financial loses are staggering even without the military humbling and complete loss of reputation. It is an unfolding disaster with no even mildly attractive exit signs.

Russia's best option BY FAR is to kill/replace/imprison Putin. That is the fastest way out of this. Just lay it all off on him, say he was crazy or whatever you like, but a quick Putin exit has got to be very, very attractive to a lot of dangerous people in Russia right now.

What can Putin offer in terms of an exit strategy that is more appealing than simply disappearing him? Nothing. No options out there.

So the Putin watch is on. We can conclude with high confidence at the first opportunity Putin will be out. How long can a firmly entrenched Putin last? How many people can he arrest before he slips up? His days are numbered. How many days is the only question. NOBODY walks away from a mistake like this. Nobody.
I don't disagree that Putin needs to be ousted, but the problem is the Globalist alliance and WEF will want a say in who that replacement is further strengthening their goal of a One World Government. Same goes for Ukraine. Hopefully the citizens of those countries haven't bought into that nonsense and push to avoid that catastrophe. Don't want to trade one catastrophe for another.
 
That's a take alright.

When you're a leftist zealot, it is no surprise the depths one will go to. Sure, Jussie (a narcissistic mentally ill gay leftist activist) tried to frame and slander millions of conservatives and would have had no issue with someone else being arrested for his lie but he doesn't deserve any consequences and is somehow the real victim here.

It takes absolutely nothing but a blind devotion to leftism and low IQ in order to get a byline in one of these DNC publications.
 
  • Like
Reactions: P19978
Hypothetically, yes. In reality, no. Dems will never give up power now
November is a long ways away and at the rapid pace things in this world are deteriorating, I have no clue what the next few months, much less the next few years are going to bring. The Dems have already pretty much shown they have zero regard for human life, or human rights and will stop at nothing to destroy their opposition in whatever ways that allow them to keep or take power.
 
I don't disagree that Putin needs to be ousted, but the problem is the Globalist alliance and WEF will want a say in who that replacement is further strengthening their goal of a One World Government. Same goes for Ukraine. Hopefully the citizens of those countries haven't bought into that nonsense and push to avoid that catastrophe. Don't want to trade one catastrophe for another.

having a Hillary/Obama/Biden type running Russia is Soros/Schwab/Rothschild's sweetest dream
 
THE NIGHT WATCHMAN

Once upon a time the government had a vast scrap yard in the middle of a desert.

Congress said, "Someone may steal from it at night." So they created a night watchman position and hired a person for the job.

Then Congress said, "How does the watchman do his job without instruction?" So they created a planning department and hired two people, one person to write the instructions,and one person to do time studies.

Then Congress said, "How will we know the night watchman is doing the tasks correctly?" So they created a Quality Control department and hired two people. One was to do the studies and one was to write the reports.

Then Congress said, "How are these people going to get paid?" So they created two positions: a time keeper and a payroll officer then hired two people.

Then Congress said, "Who will be accountable for all of these people?" So they created an administrative section and hired three people, an Administrative Officer, Assistant Administrative Officer, and a Legal Secretary.

Then Congress said, "We have had this command in operation for one year and we are $918,000 over budget, we must cut back." So they laid off the night watchman.

NOW slowly, let it sink in.

Quietly, we go like sheep to slaughter. Does anybody remember the reason given for the establishment of the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY during the Carter administration?

Anybody? Anything? Anyone? No? Didn't think so!

Bottom line is, we've spent several hundred billion dollars in support of an agency, the reason for which very few people who read this can remember!

Ready??

It was very simple... and at the time, everybody thought it very appropriate.

The Department of Energy was instituted on 8/04/1977, TO LESSEN OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN OIL.

Hey, pretty efficient, huh???

AND NOW IT'S 2022 -- 45 YEARS LATER -- AND THE BUDGET FOR THIS "NECESSARY" DEPARTMENT IS AT $242 BILLION A YEAR. IT HAS 16,000 FEDERAL EMPLOYEES AND APPROXIMATELY 100,000 CONTRACT EMPLOYEES; AND LOOK AT THE JOB IT HAS DONE!

(THIS IS WHERE YOU SLAP YOUR FOREHEAD AND SAY, "WHAT WERE THEY THINKING?")

34 years ago 30% of our oil consumption was foreign imports. Today 70% of our oil consumption is foreign imports.

Ah, yes -- good old Federal bureaucracy.

NOW, WE HAVE TURNED OVER THE BANKING SYSTEM, HEALTH CARE, AND THE AUTO INDUSTRY TO THE SAME GOVERNMENT? What can possibly go wrong?

Hello!! Anybody Home?

Signed....

The Night Watchman
 
So we're just supposed to allow people to get off scot free when faking a hate crime. He needs to be made an example of because what he did set back race relations and fostered racial tensions in this country, and people like this twitter poster and the MSM who bought into it all are complicit as well.
 
The left demands blind devotion to whatever they want or are promoting at that time. This group is the only one who seeks out a brand's opinion ("Oh, please, Gushers, tell us your opinion on BLM and the election") and then takes any silence as a complete endorsement which oddly does not apply to anything China related.

No one is allowed to be Russian now and the group who cries discrimination all the time, tosses that shit out the second it's a group they do not like.

I will go on record as not supporting either Russia nor Ukraine. They are both corrupt.
 
John Bolton, certainly no Democrat, is on record saying Trump wanted to withdraw from NATO in 2018 and repeatedly had to be talked out of it. At the NATO Summit in 2018 Trump very nearly did exactly that and had to again be talked out of pulling the US from NATO.
So Trump had the idea, the concern that NATO wasn't worthwhile to the US. What's wrong with raising that question? Lots of things this country does ought to be questioned. But because he can be rational now & then, he took the input and acted on that input: did nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaizer Sosay
With Russia set to default by April 15th we've now entered a new period. Call it the Putin death watch.

Russia is immersed in the greatest military blunder in history. The financial loses are staggering even without the military humbling and complete loss of reputation. It is an unfolding disaster with no even mildly attractive exit signs.

Russia's best option BY FAR is to kill/replace/imprison Putin. That is the fastest way out of this. Just lay it all off on him, say he was crazy or whatever you like, but a quick Putin exit has got to be very, very attractive to a lot of dangerous people in Russia right now.

What can Putin offer in terms of an exit strategy that is more appealing than simply disappearing him? Nothing. No options out there.

So the Putin watch is on. We can conclude with high confidence at the first opportunity Putin will be out. How long can a firmly entrenched Putin last? How many people can he arrest before he slips up? His days are numbered. How many days is the only question. NOBODY walks away from a mistake like this. Nobody.
I hope you're right but strongly doubt it. I don't see an internal collapse of Putin support any time soon.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT