yeah . . . that's Jam's exit poll savant Nat Meyersohn right there. Impressive work.
And you just automatically assume the story is false? lolAnd you just automatically believe the story? lol
LOLZ!!!!!OMG!!!!!And you just automatically believe the story? lol
http://www.ldnews.com/story/news/po...r-error-causes-gop-votes-appear-dem/93474872/And you just automatically believe the story? lol
Wanna feel sick to your stomach?Whichever way Soros' voting machines and the people that count the votes say they went.
Well the story was correct.And you just automatically believe the story? lol
Yes, LOL. The nerd is really hedging his bets now.True or False, since I'm at work:
Did Nate Silver tweet the polls may have been wrong?
Agree, since FirstOneNumberOneActionRealManNewsReportingFirstOne News reported it, obviously truth.Well the story was correct.
All those retard commiefornia immigrants looking to shit up another state, Colorado clearly wasn't enough.Very busy here this morning at the polls, which are located here at my workplace. ATX leans heavily left ("Little Moscow on the Colorado", according to Karl Rove).
That's a hell of a business card.Agree, since FirstOneNumberOneActionRealManNewsReportingFirstOne News reported it, obviously truth.
I really wonder when reading posts on this board if those who refer to everything in binary terms (left/right) if they really have a true understanding of the political spectrum. They seem to deem positions as left/right only by what which candidate is supporting that position or the source of the information.
I wish I could find a link to a story I read the other day where a study was done where people were given identical pieces of information with the only difference being the noted source of that info. The people were then asked to evaluate the information as to where it fell on the political spectrum on a scale of 1-10 with 1 being the most liberal and 10 being the most conservative. The overwhelming findings were that the source of the information determined where people placed it on that spectrum, not the actual contents of the information. I can almost guarantee that if the same study was done using the contributors to this board that the findings would be identical.
CBS Pittsburgh reported it.Agree, since FirstOneNumberOneActionRealManNewsReportingFirstOne News reported it, obviously truth.
Why would anyone think that???well you know..... if the news reports it then its truth.......unless its CNN in which this board thinks reports lies 24/7
Clark Co. is where Harry Reid cheated to get re-elected last time...
http://heavy.com/news/2016/10/vote-...y-clinton-machines-donald-trump-rigged-fraud/It's always R being changed to D & the excuse is always just a simple "calibration" issue.
The polling has been based on Obama's 2012 model of high black and youth voters. Early indications are that these groups are under-performing. Thus the polling model may be wrong.
Didn't read all three stories so I'm seriously asking, but was a bigger deal made about it since it was D to R; or was the final conclusion a simple calibration error?http://heavy.com/news/2016/10/vote-...y-clinton-machines-donald-trump-rigged-fraud/
http://www.ajc.com/news/state--regi...ng-presidential-votes/woKEUgpDDEyaw9o4J318XJ/
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/27/politics/donald-trump-texas-vote-flipping/
Not saying I dont think they are rigged, but there are other stories.