POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
I put zero stock in any approval rating of any politician or topic simply because the data is always such a small sample not to mention the framing of questions by the ones administering the poll/survey.
Like this poll for example states 985 registered voters were polled from a state of nearly 500,000 registered voters. Andy's polling on real clear politics shows like an average of 56% approval. What areas do you think are polled?
It is very difficult to read that silently without using an effeminate voice in your head.
Last edited:
Murphy at 57% but just barely won reelection in one of the most liberal states in the country? 🤔
Too much common sense there dude. how do you function in today’s society?
You don't have to be a member of the House to be the Speaker thereof. Can elect anyone.
For the jury to take this long, I have to think a few jurors have been/are being intimidated by outside antagonists. It's not this hard.
Fox News reporter as MSNBC is told they can wait outside....
I guess flu back on the menus boys!!
Many expert doctors stated this was going to happen. The vaccines wipe out your natural killer cells and now the body is under no protection.
It's going to get brutal. Mark my words.
He's wrong the law is 18. What's under consideration is a long rifle exemption for 16 and 17 yr olds so they can hunt. Which Kyle obviously wasn't doing. Unless you count people.
We know the DA is wrong. That’s why the gun charge was thrown out.
Disturbing that Andy Beshear is at 54%.
No the DA is right, @LowCountryCat is who I was referring to being incorrect with this:
The law about openly carrying in WI is 18. The judge chose to interpret the 16/17 hunting exception as applying generally, even when not hunting, which is legally ambiguous.
I think so too. I think there's no doubt at least some jurors are concerned about the fallout, which is absolutely egregious. This is the clearest case of self defense anyone can ever see at trial. Everything from the video, to the "let's get him", to the admission about who pointed the gun first.
Unfortunately it will take a brave set of jurors to do the right thing. I have the utmost respect for the judge, because you know he will face scrutiny for the next few weeks at least.
That's all assuming the don't have the chauvin strategy set up and arrest him if he's not guilty. Of course it's all to send a very clear message to any thinking about resisting or standing up to the mob. A dark time in our nation
Whats the law for a convicted felon having an unregistered hand gun and carrying it concealed without a conceal carry? Like Grosskruetz
Only on MSNBC 😂🍺
Right, everyone is wrong but you and your fellow idiot, the DA. How about that, 2 DAs.
https://peoplespundit.locals.com/post/1229840/kamala-harris-video-meme-as-promised
I win post of the day...maybe of the year.
I win post of the day...maybe of the year.
I'm not asking you to trust me, look it up for yourself. You'll see I'm right.
I don’t need to look it up, the f**king judge already ruled on it.
He asked the prosecutor if he agreed, and he did. So the dismissal was without objection. It wasn't like he just dismissed it on his own accord.
I didn't dispute his ruling, just pointed out the inaccuracies in the conversation surrounding it.
Yeah because it was legally ambiguous, exactly like I said. They went back and forth on it several times in fact, with the judge not dismissing it in October. Would've taken too long to contest the wording of a 1991 law on a misdemeanor gun charge in the middle of a murder trial. It was dismissed minutes before closing arguments.
At the conclusion of the evidence, the judge asked the prosecutor if he disagreed with the dismissal. He did not. If it was ambiguous, he would object and it would be argued. He sure didn't hesitate to push everything else no matter how weak. So that tells you it must be well settled law in that jurisdiction
No decent conservative should ever spend money there.
You would think that this MSNBC and jury story would be enough to completely nuke that network. A MSM network just got caught trying to intimidate the jury in a huge trial. But no it will be completely forgotten by the start of next week.
BuT ThE JuDgE iS FaVoRaBlE tO RiTTenHoUsE
Actually a Karen is the foreperson
You’re wrong. The state never plead that Kyle was not in compliance. Read the pleading.
As I noted before, the state never plead that Kyle was not in compliance with the law. Judge should have never let it be a charge. He had to dismiss it by law because no law was in dispute by the state.
Just more chicanery by Binger.
That leftist scum chased him down for one reason and one reason only, hate. They couldn't stand how he looked and what that represents to them.
THe leftist scum in the media are no different.
THe leftist scum in the media are no different.
Regardless of what jury does, judge shouldn't declare mistrial. If jurors can't agree to acquit, he should issue summary acquittal; i.e., have the balls to do the right thing that the collective jury didn't have. A second trial would be idiotic carry-on the current farse.
