Interesting slogan consider you and KB share an affinity for the brown eye.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Interesting slogan consider you and KB share an affinity for the brown eye.
Can someone tell me what Trump has done that makes him so "racist" against blacks or is that just the generic label to attach to anyone running against Democrats?
You'd think that the black community would look around their communities and realize Democrats don't do crap but further ruin their areas but Dems love to portray racism in everything to keep them dependent.
Honestly, if there were ever a candidate we need to win the presidency, it's Trump. Because his election would completely change the game and send a message and help halt some of the corruption.
I also just want to give a big middle finger to the media.
If the firebombing were reversed...the MSM would ask Trump 7/24 if he condemns it and would ask if he is pulling out of race.
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
The media is partially to blame for it. When someone is constantly deemed racist the way the media does, it helps fuel acts of violence like that.
Because Republicans corner themselves with a self righteous religion. They are too easy to pin down into hypocrisy.
Also democrats realize in these situations to just duck the limelight for a few days and let things blow over.
For starters Republicans are always successful old white men. Which is easy to point at and say racist and let them stumble and fall all over themselves while not knowing how to handle it.
For Trump everything is perception and he is too stupid to say I'm not racist and leave it alone......he drags it out day after day and eventually the masses see anything and assume he is defending himself because he is racist.
I've said from day one you have to relate to blacks(which they make very hard) and understand their issue. The majority struggle to get by and depend on govt assistance. If they do not then they still feel that America owes them.....which is why welfare and free stuff can easily be sold to them.
Intelligent people see that blacks get played but blacks don't give a damn. The reason is their overall mentality of "we will burn this MFer down, including our own stuff, to make someone pay". That mentality is tough for anyone to overcome, let alone an old white succesful dude that really doesn't give a shit.
We live in the world where Fox News dwarfs the rest of the left leaning news organizations and the proliferation of right leanings news sites such as Breibart, I find it sad that you all still whine about the media.
Sad...
Just saw someone on Twitter saying the local media is reporting it as vandalism.
Once again, 4 months since my initial challenge: show me a racist Trump quote.
None provided yet
None provided yet
Not in the same hemisphere as the truth when you look at total reach of all content (online, social media, print, tv, radio). It's a rout.
I swear to christ, as this campaign goes on, I keep thinking, "that is the stupidest thing a human could ever say."
Then we get, "fox news dwarfs all other media combined," and I'm shown that no matter how dumb someone is, there's always someone more retarded willing to make their ignorance known.
Then we get, "fox news dwarfs all other media combined," and I'm shown that no matter how dumb someone is, there's always someone more retarded willing to make their ignorance known.
He isn't even serious about that.
That was about one of the most sarcastic troll posts that this political thread has ever seen.
So you think CNN, MSNBC and or other left leaning companies report accurately?
I've seen almost every single Fox News reporter with a show deliver the negative Trumps news and call him out.
I've not seen anyone really try to dive into the accuracy of Wikileaks or question/report the bad ones. I've also seen said reporters silence anyone that wants to discuss them.
I predict the press with bang on HRC a little this week to get some heat off and tighten the race a bit to keep viewers/readers engaged (and make more money) and then gear it up the last two weeks.
True.
"None of the stories that horrify them now are new. They are years old. Decades, even. It is mind-blowing that no one decided to drop any of this before now. Unless, of course, you believe the idea that they sat on it in order to destroy him in the general. What’s more, that they did so at the request of the Clinton campaign. It is not only plausible, it is in fact the most likely scenario. It’s not like the journalists just sat on their hands for a year before dropping all this. A little research, a few phone calls, and all of this information would have been out there much sooner. But, that didn’t help the agenda.
So, while some folks on the Right can (and should) take some of the blame for creating the monster that is Republican Nominee Donald Trump, the Media cannot be allowed to feel horrified for the monster they too helped to make. This is on them. They had stories, they chose not to run them. They chose to favor a candidate. They were too afraid to lose a source."
"None of the stories that horrify them now are new. They are years old. Decades, even. It is mind-blowing that no one decided to drop any of this before now. Unless, of course, you believe the idea that they sat on it in order to destroy him in the general. What’s more, that they did so at the request of the Clinton campaign. It is not only plausible, it is in fact the most likely scenario. It’s not like the journalists just sat on their hands for a year before dropping all this. A little research, a few phone calls, and all of this information would have been out there much sooner. But, that didn’t help the agenda.
So, while some folks on the Right can (and should) take some of the blame for creating the monster that is Republican Nominee Donald Trump, the Media cannot be allowed to feel horrified for the monster they too helped to make. This is on them. They had stories, they chose not to run them. They chose to favor a candidate. They were too afraid to lose a source."
At this point, Fox is protecting their own interests against Breibart...
But thinking that Hannity and O'Reilly have a single shred of unbiased journalistic reporting is laughable at best.
I mean, I am positive Hannity gives DT rim-jobs on a constant basis.
Wah!!! Y'all been complaining about the media for the past fifty years and still nothing...nothing after fifty years?
Y'all just sad.
Radio? Who the heck still listens to the radio for their news other than old, white people listening to Rush?
First off those claims aren't true. No one starts sexual assault charges 4 weeks before an election.
and secondly, I really have to question America's reasoning and deductive skills when Trump's nasty remarks get more attention than Clinton crimes. I am absolutely baffled how people rationalize that. It's as if they have no business voting.
That is the point I made this morning with the Raddatz post. This idiotic notion that the media cannot report on the leaked stuff to any degree because they have to run with the DT stuff is garbage.
Saw the new ABC/WashPost poll has Hillary up 4. What. Tha. Hell? After the worst blitzkrieg since Germany bombed Pearl Harbor? I'm thinking there's gonna be about 20,000 people who will actually turn out to vote by the time it gets here....
POLITICO: “Donald Trump has lost little support since the first presidential debate, despite days of damaging news stories about his treatment of women, according to a new poll.”
Ann Althouse: “That’s Politico, putting in rather bland terms something that ought to be powerfully alarming to those who cannot abide even the risk that Trump could win the presidency. Why isn’t he losing by a lot more? What explains his pesky resiliency?”
POLITICO: “Donald Trump has lost little support since the first presidential debate, despite days of damaging news stories about his treatment of women, according to a new poll.”
Ann Althouse: “That’s Politico, putting in rather bland terms something that ought to be powerfully alarming to those who cannot abide even the risk that Trump could win the presidency. Why isn’t he losing by a lot more? What explains his pesky resiliency?”
Trump's refusal to accept intelligence briefing on Russia stuns experts
"Former senior U.S. national security officials are dismayed at Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's repeated refusal to accept the judgment of intelligence professionals that Russia stole files from the Democratic National Committee computers in an effort to influence the U.S. election."
"The former officials, who have served presidents in both parties, say they were bewildered when Trump cast doubt on Russia's role after receiving a classified briefing on the subject and again after an unusually blunt statement from U.S. agencies saying they were "confident" that Moscow had orchestrated the attacks."
"It defies logic," retired Gen. Michael Hayden, former director of the CIA and the National Security Agency, said of Trump's pronouncements.
"Trump has assured supporters that, if elected, he would surround himself with experts on defense and foreign affairs, where he has little experience. But when it comes to Russia, he has made it clear that he is not listening to intelligence officials, the former officials said."
"He seems to ignore their advice," Hayden said. "Why would you assume this would change when he is in office?"
"That conclusion was followed by a public and unequivocal announcement by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Homeland Security that Russia was to blame."
"Maybe there is no hacking," Trump said during that debate.
"I don't recall a previous candidate saying they didn't believe" the information from an intelligence briefing, said John Rizzo, a former CIA lawyer who served under seven presidents and became the agency's acting general counsel."
"Former senior U.S. national security officials are dismayed at Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's repeated refusal to accept the judgment of intelligence professionals that Russia stole files from the Democratic National Committee computers in an effort to influence the U.S. election."
"The former officials, who have served presidents in both parties, say they were bewildered when Trump cast doubt on Russia's role after receiving a classified briefing on the subject and again after an unusually blunt statement from U.S. agencies saying they were "confident" that Moscow had orchestrated the attacks."
"It defies logic," retired Gen. Michael Hayden, former director of the CIA and the National Security Agency, said of Trump's pronouncements.
"Trump has assured supporters that, if elected, he would surround himself with experts on defense and foreign affairs, where he has little experience. But when it comes to Russia, he has made it clear that he is not listening to intelligence officials, the former officials said."
"He seems to ignore their advice," Hayden said. "Why would you assume this would change when he is in office?"
"That conclusion was followed by a public and unequivocal announcement by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Homeland Security that Russia was to blame."
"Maybe there is no hacking," Trump said during that debate.
"I don't recall a previous candidate saying they didn't believe" the information from an intelligence briefing, said John Rizzo, a former CIA lawyer who served under seven presidents and became the agency's acting general counsel."
The current POTUS has ignored foreign policy and military leaders countless times with poor results. I find that more troubling than a trailing candidate that "seems" to be ignoring.
Why would he accept their judgement & play into their red scare conspiracy? The FBI, State Department, DOJ etc... have all been compromised by Obama's WH. The hacked emails have clearly shown this. If there's evidence that Russia is behind the hacks, then put up or shut up.
Come on - do you realize how many people are in their cars and trucks every day for work?
So Trump received classified briefings, and the guys who are not privy to the classified info are bewildered that Trump didn't conform to their preconceived unclassified conclusions?
And that's a knock against Trump?
And that's a knock against Trump?
Thanks but if these aren't some of the alleged deleted emails from her server, why is every Trumppet saying they are? If accurate, doesn't their existence give more ammo to the alleged Russian hack of this year instead?
Haven't seen anyone claim these were from her server. Thought it was pretty clear these were hacked from Podesta.
Lo effing L at albanylibtard trying to compare a TALK show host..where people have effing opinions and admit it to effing NEWS anchors. What a douche
If Russia hacked Clinton, and is working this hard to save America, I might just become a card carrying member of the Motherland.
If only the Amercan media tried as hard to save America from the crony globalism and corruption of Clinton.
If only the Amercan media tried as hard to save America from the crony globalism and corruption of Clinton.
The federal government reads every email we send.
Why is it wrong that the people finally get to read what members of the federal government were sending?
And by the way, there's faaaaaaar more evidence seth rich leaked those emails than there is Russia had anything to do with it.
Wikileaks is far more trustworthy and honorable than anyone within 100 miles of the Clinton campaign.
Why is it wrong that the people finally get to read what members of the federal government were sending?
And by the way, there's faaaaaaar more evidence seth rich leaked those emails than there is Russia had anything to do with it.
Wikileaks is far more trustworthy and honorable than anyone within 100 miles of the Clinton campaign.
You are the most uniformed and dishonest poster on this board. Congrats!
Dishonest? I know I'm not a fan of yours, but dishonest? I know my opinions hurt deep down because you know I am telling the truth, but that's OK.
As Michelle says, "when they go low, you go high".
Similar threads
