De Sousa being held out at KU

[Nooneputsbabyinacorner]

Just got home from work. I stated that the worst that would happen is De Sousa gets held out this year while his eligibility gets reviewed. Kansas had nothing to do with the Maryland booster's alleged payment to his guardian. He was cleared by the NCAA last year, so doubt anything last year gets vacated. If they actually find evidence that $60K was paid, he probably won't play this year.

Next up in February and April is the Nike trials.

 

[Wildcat-in-STL]

Just got home from work. I stated that the worst that would happen is De Sousa gets held out this year while his eligibility gets reviewed. Kansas had nothing to do with the Maryland booster's alleged payment to his guardian. He was cleared by the NCAA last year, so doubt anything last year gets vacated. If they actually find evidence that $60K was paid, he probably won't play this year.

Next up in February and April is the Nike trials.

those have nothing to do with Nike.. .just coaches taking money from agents

 

[Nooneputsbabyinacorner]

those have nothing to do with Nike.. .just coaches taking money from agents

Isn't Arizona a Nike school?

 

[LineSkiCat14]

Just got home from work. I stated that the worst that would happen is De Sousa gets held out this year while his eligibility gets reviewed. Kansas had nothing to do with the Maryland booster's alleged payment to his guardian. He was cleared by the NCAA last year, so doubt anything last year gets vacated. If they actually find evidence that $60K was paid, he probably won't play this year.

Next up in February and April is the Nike trials.

Loses yet another recruit, doesn't care.

I'll tell you this.. If I lost Billy Preston for the year he was at Kentucky, while also having to put up with piss poor recruiting... I'd be pretty upset with Cal.

I don't get how Kansas fans can continually lose recruits like this, and not give a single shit.

 

[Slowwalker]

I’m multitasking right now

We can see you are good at trolling, being an idiot, and a douche nozzle all at the same time that is for sure!

 

[Cardsstink]

Loses yet another recruit, doesn't care.

I'll tell you this.. If I lost Billy Preston for the year he was at Kentucky, while also having to put up with piss poor recruiting... I'd be pretty upset with Cal.

I don't get how Kansas fans can continually lose recruits like this, and not give a single shit.

Oh, they care. They just don't want anyone to see them sweat, especially UK fans.

 

[qwesley]

Just got home from work. I stated that the worst that would happen is De Sousa gets held out this year while his eligibility gets reviewed. Kansas had nothing to do with the Maryland booster's alleged payment to his guardian. He was cleared by the NCAA last year, so doubt anything last year gets vacated. If they actually find evidence that $60K was paid, he probably won't play this year.

Next up in February and April is the Nike trials.

I do and still feel that De Sousa gets to play.

 

[LineSkiCat14]

Like.. It's you and your team that gets screwed. Not us. Kentucky is fine. This helps our recruiting. This is why kentucky keeps getting players. And now we have one less experience Kansas player to worry about when we play.

 

[LineSkiCat14]

Oh, they care. They just don't want anyone to see them sweat, especially UK fans.

 

[Wildcat-in-STL]

Isn't Arizona a Nike school?

But it has no relevance to the case.

 

[$Z71$]

This is also a fact... what you want Duke to get punished for does not equate to NCAA violations.

Did you miss this?

It’s a direct violation, clearly written in the rules.

• A loan of money, regardless of temporary nature of loan, intent to pay back the value, or whom the loan is from (i.e. parents of teammates are not appropriate persons to offer loans to student athletes.)  
• A special discount, payment arrangement or credit on apurchase or service

 

[drbubba]

Will he play this year? I say doubtful.

View embedded media

But why! You just told us nobody at KU paid him....So WHY?

 

[Nooneputsbabyinacorner]

Loses yet another recruit, doesn't care.

I'll tell you this.. If I lost Billy Preston for the year he was at Kentucky, while also having to put up with piss poor recruiting... I'd be pretty upset with Cal.

I don't get how Kansas fans can continually lose recruits like this, and not give a single shit.

Self gets a lot of criticism on the Kansas board I frequent about recruiting failures. It is hard to complain about the season last year as we made it to the final four.

 

[Nooneputsbabyinacorner]

But why! You just told us nobody at KU paid him....So WHY?

Nobody at KU paid him. Parish is posting click bait and does nothing but writes hit pieces trying to create fake news.

 

[UKrazycat2]

Self gets a lot of criticism on the Kansas board I frequent about recruiting failures. It is hard to complain about the season last year as we made it to the final four.

Soon to be vacated.

 

[Wildcat-in-STL]

Thanks for beating Duke last year.......... thats all the positivity I can muster for KU

 

[Wildcat-in-STL]

Soon to be vacated.

He clearly doesnt have a grasp on NCAA rules.... or maybe he completely missed that Bowen was still ineligible at USC jr.... they didnt pay him either.

 

[Nooneputsbabyinacorner]

He clearly doesnt have a grasp on NCAA rules.... or maybe he completely missed that Bowen was still ineligible at USC jr.... they didnt pay him either.

There is plenty of precedent where a player received improper benefits, sat games, and then came back to play.

 

[Wildcats1st]

KU at the very least should vacate their final four from last year and be banned from this upcoming post season. Probably won’t happen but if this becomes a big dostraction for them I wouldn’t be suprised if the ad pull the plug on the postseason in January.

 

[Nooneputsbabyinacorner]

KU at the very least should vacate their final four from last year and be banned from this upcoming post season. Probably won’t happen but if this becomes a big dostraction for them I wouldn’t be suprised if the ad pull the plug on the postseason in January.

Why? The NCAA cleared De Sousa, so like Kansas who played them, they were duped too. Are they going to punish themselves too?

 

[Aike]

Why? The NCAA cleared De Sousa, so like Kansas who played them, they were duped too. Are they going to punish themselves too?

They cleared Rose to play at Memphis too.

 

[Wildcat-in-STL]

There is plenty of precedent where a player received improper benefits, sat games, and then came back to play.

Did Preston?

 

[kl40504]

Just got home from work. I stated that the worst that would happen is De Sousa gets held out this year while his eligibility gets reviewed. Kansas had nothing to do with the Maryland booster's alleged payment to his guardian. He was cleared by the NCAA last year, so doubt anything last year gets vacated. If they actually find evidence that $60K was paid, he probably won't play this year.

Next up in February and April is the Nike trials.

You were saying early on that DeSousa would play and nothing would happen to Kansas. You now have changed your mind on DeSousa and let's see what happens to Kansas. This is what Gary Parrish is saying: We’re not there yet. The NCAA will address the Kansas situation in time. And, when it does, I can’t think of any reason why Kansas won’t be required to vacate its 2018 Final Four appearance.

 

[UKrazycat2]

Cornercuck (thanks again Morg) hasn't been right on one single excuse he's posted on here. He can't possibly be as ignorant as he shows on here. Has to be a mental defect.

 

[Wildcat-in-STL]

@ Cornercuck.

 

[Nooneputsbabyinacorner]

They cleared Rose to play at Memphis too.

During the season they informed Memphis that they were investigating his SAT scores and recommended he be held out, but was played anyway.

 

[kl40504]

During the season they informed Memphis that they were investigating his SAT scores and recommended he be held out, but was played anyway.

So

 

[westerncat]

I mean if you’re going to say K paid Maggette then you gotta day Cal paid Camby right?

The NCAA cleared Cal !

 

[UKrazycat2]

@ Cornercuck.

Morg pinned that one on him. It's perfect.

 

[wromanp7]

Just got home from work. I stated that the worst that would happen is De Sousa gets held out this year while his eligibility gets reviewed. Kansas had nothing to do with the Maryland booster's alleged payment to his guardian. He was cleared by the NCAA last year, so doubt anything last year gets vacated. If they actually find evidence that $60K was paid, he probably won't play this year.

Next up in February and April is the Nike trials.

I have inside info that KU is getting hit and it’s coming fast.

 

[TheBigBlueHerro]

During the season they informed Memphis that they were investigating his SAT scores and recommended he be held out, but was played anyway.

But they didn't just vacate the games after which they reopened their investigation. They vacated all games, even the ones he had been ruled eligible by the NCAA to play. UL players were all ruled eligible and played, but were later ruled ineligible after their benefits came to light. NCAA has already set ample precedent that they can and will overrule their previous decision on a players eligibility. Even long after.

 

[Nooneputsbabyinacorner]

So

Just pointing out the difference between the two situations.

 

[UKrazycat2]

There is plenty of precedent where a player received improper benefits, sat games, and then came back to play.

The moment Silvia de Suzy and family took cash to play for Kansass, he became an ineligible player. Say goodbye to every win last year, the FF banner, and the 173rd Pig 12 banner.

 

[Skyguyb27]

Just got home from work. I stated that the worst that would happen is De Sousa gets held out this year while his eligibility gets reviewed. Kansas had nothing to do with the Maryland booster's alleged payment to his guardian. He was cleared by the NCAA last year, so doubt anything last year gets vacated. If they actually find evidence that $60K was paid, he probably won't play this year.

Next up in February and April is the Nike trials.

Thats not how it works. If they find out after the fact he he took money he is still ruled ineligible and games must be forfeited. It's probably a new concept to you since you usually lose your recruits before the season starts.

 

[Nooneputsbabyinacorner]

But they didn't just vacate the games after which they reopened their investigation. They vacated all games, even the ones he had been ruled eligible by the NCAA to play. UL players were all ruled eligible and played, but were later ruled ineligible after their benefits came to light. NCAA has already set ample precedent that they can and will overrule their previous decision on a players eligibility. Even long after.

Right, but Memphis was warned. NCAA cleared De Sousa and was duped just like KU. I also don't know how they could have vacated Memphis's wins, since the investigation was dropped after Rose graduated and would not cooperate with the NCAA.

 

[Wildcat-in-STL]

The moment Silvia de Suzy and family took cash to play for Kansass, he became an ineligible player. Say goodbye to every win last year, the FF banner, and the 173rd Pig 12 banner.

Technically as soon as he took money for Maryland.... ..which is a while before he would of accepted money from KU

 

[Nooneputsbabyinacorner]

The moment Silvia de Suzy and family took cash to play for Kansass, he became an ineligible player. Say goodbye to every win last year, the FF banner, and the 173rd Pig 12 banner.

His guardian took money to influence him to play at Maryland from a Maryland booster. Your post is factually incorrect.

 

[Nooneputsbabyinacorner]

Thats not how it works. If they find out after the fact he he took money he is still ruled ineligible and games must be forfeited. It's probably a new concept to you since you usually lose your recruits before the season starts.

I get the concept, but NCAA cleared him. If they retrospectively punish KU, they'll have to punish themselves.

 

[Wildcat-in-STL]

His guardian took money to influence him to play at Maryland from a Maryland booster. Your post is factually incorrect.

doesnt matter.. 20K is still enough to be permanently ineligible even if he did pay it back.

 

[kornucopia]

Kansas is F*cked