Exactly what I’ve been saying. How in the world he was second in defensive rating I’ll never know. That doesn’t even make sense to me.He was lost on defense. LOST. That was my big concern with his play.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly what I’ve been saying. How in the world he was second in defensive rating I’ll never know. That doesn’t even make sense to me.He was lost on defense. LOST. That was my big concern with his play.
Impressive run of not knowing what you're talking about. Maybe you can be wrong in 4-5 more threads today and run the table.Exactly what I’ve been saying. How in the world he was second in defensive rating I’ll never know. That doesn’t even make sense to me.
It looks to me like that everyone that ranks college basketball teams, has Gonzaga ranked ahead of Kentucky. So the answer to your question is everyone.Second? Lol.
Who would rank Gonzaga ahead of Kentucky?
Including you —the not-so-secret Zag Nut. For the record, I was making a joke about someone “only” ranking Kentucky #2, when pre-season at least, 10-15 is probably more accurate. But one thing is for sure: at the END of the season someone besides Gonzaga will cut down the nets. The greatest chance that Giant-Among-Midgets program will ever have was COVID year. And you didn’t get it done.It looks to me like that everyone that ranks college basketball teams, has Gonzaga ranked ahead of Kentucky. So the answer to your question is everyone.
You think the Cats are going to beat duke ? Their piece of shit coach is retiring. It will be 5 on 8 before the teams even step on the floor. If you think that duke has gotten all the breaks from the reffs before, just wait till this year. Duke players will be flopping even when there is not a Kentucky player around them, and it will be a charge. The breaks that duke will get this year will be even more sickening than it has been in the past. Kentucky will have the better players, but if the win it will suprise me. I just don't think they will be allowed to win.Regardless of where we are ranked preseason, beating Dook the first game would certainly be a a great way to start the season after our 9-win disaster.
You can say they won't cut down the nets about all 353 college basketball teams and you would only be wrong once, so your statement doesn't mean jack shit.Including you —the not-so-secret Zag Nut. For the record, I was making a joke about someone “only” ranking Kentucky #2, when pre-season at least, 10-15 is probably more accurate. But one thing is for sure: at the END of the season someone besides Gonzaga will cut down the nets. The greatest chance that Giant-Among-Midgets program will ever have was COVID year. And you didn’t get it done.
What about Andrew Nembhard? I thought he was coming back to Gonzaga for next season. If so, I would think Hickman will be the backup PG as a freshman (a perfect spot for him), and a real problem for other teams as a sophomore.They no longer have Suggs at PG. Their backcourt takes a big hit there.
They have Freshman Nolan Hickman (former UK signee) projected as their starting PG. He is a far cry from Suggs.
Once again, nobody on their roster is replacing Suggs. Did anyone watch Suggs play last year?What about Andrew Nembhard? I thought he was coming back to Gonzaga for next season. If so, I would think Hickman will be the backup PG as a freshman (a perfect spot for him), and a real problem for other teams as a sophomore.
This...Once again, nobody on their roster is replacing Suggs. Did anyone watch Suggs play last year?
When you lose an All-American, you usually take a step back. Gonzaga is still going to be a great team, but not as good as last year’s team. Regardless, they are still Final Four caliber, I just don’t think they easily replace Suggs.
I watched Suggs play some last season. But that wasn't my point. I thought you said Hickman was going to be the starting PG for Gonzaga, and I wondered if maybe Nembhard was going in the draft. If not, based on my viewing of Gonzaga a handful of times and reading a little about them, I would think Nembhard - who looks like a very nice college PG to me - would be the starting PG.Once again, nobody on their roster is replacing Suggs. Did anyone watch Suggs play last year?
When you lose an All-American, you usually take a step back. Gonzaga is still going to be a great team, but not as good as last year’s team. Regardless, they are still Final Four caliber, I just don’t think they easily replace Suggs.
I called him butters last year. His handle was pretty bad. He and Sarr would fumble the ball most times they received it in the post. He constantly drifted out and took 3s that he mostly missed and too often showed a low BB IQ when he was the returnee we were counting on.There’s many a UK fan that shares my opinion, that Brooks was terrible last season, for the most part. He did rebound very well, I’ll give him that. As far as every other aspect, he was abysmal.
Everyone seems to agree with me that Brooks played like shit last season, regardless of all these analytics people wanna try to use. Numbers don’t always tell the whole story. Only person running the table on being wrong is you, clown.Impressive run of not knowing what you're talking about. Maybe you can be wrong in 4-5 more threads today and run the table.
Brooks biggest issue by far was not showing up a lot of games. One of those guys that can be great one game and take off the next one. If he starts that stuff this year maybe they will start and play Toppin most of the time because his effort was very consistent from game to game.How can you say Brooks was terrible? He made a big jump from year 1. He was also our best rebounder. He was a solid scorer. Just not a good 3 point shooter. However he was inconsistent. But he was 1 of our top 3 best players. And had games where he was our best. If he has the same improvement from year 2 to 3 like he did from 1 to 2, I’ll be very pleased
Nembhard will be back. Few likes to have 2 point guards in the lineup together, so Nembhard and Hickman will probably both be starting, and unlike a lot of you on here are saying, Hunter Sallis is not a point guard, and he may be starting as well.What about Andrew Nembhard? I thought he was coming back to Gonzaga for next season. If so, I would think Hickman will be the backup PG as a freshman (a perfect spot for him), and a real problem for other teams as a sophomore.
Brooks has the athletic ability and size to go to another level this coming season. And that’s really all I care about. And I strongly feel he’s surrounded by enough talent now to help achieve that new level.Everyone seems to agree with me that Brooks played like shit last season, regardless of all these analytics people wanna try to use. Numbers don’t always tell the whole story. Only person running the table on being wrong is you, clown.
This isn't true. Literally nobody said that unless they were joking.hard to get excited for preseason rankings.
weren't some predicting 40- 0 last season?
this is true...plenty of people on here predicting an undefeated season.This isn't true. Literally nobody said that unless they were joking.
I agree with you on both. But, for people to sit here and pretend that Brooks was some great performer and pissed excellence last season just isn’t the case.Brooks has the athletic ability and size to go to another level this coming season. And that’s really all I care about. And I strongly feel he’s surrounded by enough talent now to help achieve that new level.
Most projected starting lineups have Hickman at the 1, Nembhard at the 2, and Sallis at the 3. All three have some PG skills, but Hickman is probably the closest of the 3 of them to a true PG. Nembhard is a good scorer off the ball, which is why he will likely play at the 2.Nembhard will be back. Few likes to have 2 point guards in the lineup together, so Nembhard and Hickman will probably both be starting, and unlike a lot of you on here are saying, Hunter Sallis is not a point guard, and he may be starting as well.
I wouldn’t go that far, considering we were a 9 win team last season and they almost went undefeated and almost won the title. They lost a lot, but they brought in a great class with Holmgren, Sallis, and Hickman leading the way. Also, they return one of the best players in the country in Timme.No way Gonzaga should be ranked ahead of us after what Cal hauled in this off-season.
I don’t know what you watched this past season, but Cal unquestionably did NOT have the most talent in the country.How do you only win 9 games with the most talent in the country? Dude love aka coach cal can recruit but he can't coach worth a darn.
All I ever saw was sarcasm, there was no legit "we're going 40-0" comments that I ever saw and no, I'm not going to be an ass and tell you to pove it, I'm just saying I never saw anyone legit predict 40-0 last year.this is true...plenty of people on here predicting an undefeated season.
I see. Well, that looks to be a little less shooting than you normally see from Gonzaga in the 1-3 spots, doesn't it? Maybe better athletes and upside I suppose, but not the same 3 pt. shooting. I guess a fan can rationalize away any perceived weaknesses, but to me the shooting efficiency has the potential to be a bit of an issue; and I think it's going to be harder to replace Kispert than Suggs. Still the potential for a very good team, though.Nembhard will be back. Few likes to have 2 point guards in the lineup together, so Nembhard and Hickman will probably both be starting, and unlike a lot of you on here are saying, Hunter Sallis is not a point guard, and he may be starting as well.
Agreed. All I know is that I’m not worried even one iota about Gonzaga. If they couldn’t win it with the team they had last season, in a Covid restricted year, they never will IMO.I see. Well, that looks to be a little less shooting than you normally see from Gonzaga in the 1-3 spots, doesn't it? Maybe better athletes and upside I suppose, but not the same 3 pt. shooting. I guess a fan can rationalize away any perceived weaknesses, but to me the shooting efficiency has the potential to be a bit of an issue; and I think it's going to be harder to replace Kispert than Suggs. Still the potential for a very good team, though.
Agree and let's be honest not every coach handles freshman as well as others and they could have 3 starting next season. That weak second half of the season schedule could lead to some fools gold and over confidenceAgreed. All I know is that I’m not worried even one iota about Gonzaga. If they couldn’t win it with the team they had last season, in a Covid restricted year, they never will IMO.
The back end of their schedule (conference) really hurts that program IMO. I’ve been saying it forever. When you go three months beating up on teams far inferior to you, it’s going to hurt your team.
It hurts from the standpoint that you’re not battle tested and playing close, grind out games. You need those type of games to prepare you for the tournament. It also hurts from the standpoint that you’re competing against teams that aren’t anywhere near as athletic and/or as physical as the teams you’re going to play in the latter rounds of the tournament. Iron sharpens iron.
In theory this sounds good but then I see things like Big Ten teams constantly having to grind out games last season and we all saw how they ended up doing in the tournament.Agreed. All I know is that I’m not worried even one iota about Gonzaga. If they couldn’t win it with the team they had last season, in a Covid restricted year, they never will IMO.
The back end of their schedule (conference) really hurts that program IMO. I’ve been saying it forever. When you go three months beating up on teams far inferior to you, it’s going to hurt your team.
It hurts from the standpoint that you’re not battle tested and playing close, grind out games. You need those type of games to prepare you for the tournament. It also hurts from the standpoint that you’re competing against teams that aren’t anywhere near as athletic and/or as physical as the teams you’re going to play in the latter rounds of the tournament. Iron sharpens iron.
I didn't say anything about anyone "legit". I believe you didn't see any of these comments. that does not make my statement false. thank you for not being an ass. it's enough just calling me a liar.All I ever saw was sarcasm, there was no legit "we're going 40-0" comments that I ever saw and no, I'm not going to be an ass and tell you to pove it, I'm just saying I never saw anyone legit predict 40-0 last year.
Brooks was indeed 1st in points per 100 possession but he wasn't efficient in general....Brooks was 6th in OffRating (103.3) behind Jackson, Sarr, Mintz, Toppin, and Allen.This is just false. Brooks was our most efficient scorer last season, averaging 25 points per 100 possessions (for reference, Mintz averaged 21 points per 100). Brooks achieved that while also posting the team’s second highest defensive efficiency and rebounding rate after Isaiah Jackson.
True, but he got his buckets.Brooks was indeed 1st in points per 100 possession but he wasn't efficient in general....Brooks was 6th in OffRating (103.3) behind Jackson, Sarr, Mintz, Toppin, and Allen.
Regards
Didn’t say you were a liar, I basically said you misunderstood what you were reading.I didn't say anything about anyone "legit". I believe you didn't see any of these comments. that does not make my statement false. thank you for not being an ass. it's enough just calling me a liar.
let me see if I comprehend this correctly. so you weren't calling me a liar. you call me a dumbass instead. first class all the way....you are!Didn’t say you were a liar, I basically said you misunderstood what you were reading.
In other words, you have a reading comprehension problem.
I assure you nobody predicted 40-0 last year and meant it.
That’s a stretch, I don't think you’re a dumbass, I just think you don’t understand sarcasm. Nobody predicted 40-0 last year and meant it.let me see if I comprehend this correctly. so you weren't calling me a liar. you call me a dumbass instead. first class all the way....you are!
I make a statement about post I have read on here.That’s a stretch, I don't think you’re a dumbass, I just think you don’t understand sarcasm. Nobody predicted 40-0 last year and meant it.