I'll take The Horse , 27000+ points, 11000+ rebounds, 2900+ assists - the man was simply a tough as nails, brilliant basketball player - Dan Issel
should’ve gotten a title at kentucky.I'll take The Horse , 27000+ points, 11000+ rebounds, 2900+ assists - the man was simply a tough as nails, brilliant basketball player - Dan Issel
Lol I like it. 2 for 1I believe I am up, so I will take Steve Kerr as my HC. Heck, maybe he can step in and hit a three too.
@jrpross on the clock
AAHHH! That was the guy last round that I said I wanted this round. He ALMOST got back to me. But you can’t stop me from having a former Kentucky great come off my bench. Damn the torpedoes and gimme Dan Issel! @YaySportsThis is a guy that everyone here would agree had a disappointing career because of injuries. When you look back, he averaged 19,5,4 for a decade which is pretty solid. But since this draft assumes everyone is 100% healthy, I need a Cat on my team and there's none better than Jamal Mashburn.
AAHHH! That was the guy last round that I said I wanted this round. He ALMOST got back to me. But you can’t stop me from having a former Kentucky great come off my bench. Damn the torpedoes and gimme Dan Issel! @YaySports
Big blue has dan isselAAHHH! That was the guy last round that I said I wanted this round. He ALMOST got back to me. But you can’t stop me from having a former Kentucky great come off my bench. Damn the torpedoes and gimme Dan Issel! @YaySports
I wonder if I was the only one who put together a list of players at each position on three pages before the draft. My guess would be I probably was lol
No. I make a ranking list for all of these drafts. But, I’ve wondered since my first draft if I’m the only one. Lol.
I could definitely add that dimension, but it would require a bit more time and thinking in creating the list. Instead I found it easier to just list them by position, having a general idea of where the players should rank both relative to their position and to where they should rank on an all-time list, as well as considering what type of skills the players have and what I'd need to add to my team at the time.
That’s essentially what I do. I look at lists online but rank them according to my preference & in some cases add or subtract players to/from the list. Probably takes an hour or so. But, it’s nothing extensive.
That's not too far off from what I did. I'll take the rankings seriously to a certain extent, but give them a general sort of ranking relative to their position and every player regardless of position. If there's a player I'm not too familiar with, I'll do a little research on him to look at his stats find out more about his skill set. Sometimes I'll even take a player at a position I'd rank lower than a player ahead of him, but take the player I rank lower since his skill would line up with what I need for my team. For example, in this draft, it's why I took Steve Nash over some of the other point guards that were still available at the time. You could certainly argue Nash wasn't the "best available" point guard, but I felt like I needed a knockdown outside shooter, which is a skill that I didn't feel the other point guards available consistently provided or didn't provide at all. Plus Chris Paul was my target and he got swiped just one pick before I was ready to select, that also factored in lol
I studied real hard on the first one I was in. Didn't go anything like I expected/wanted. Now I just wing it.No. I make a ranking list for all of these drafts. But, I’ve wondered since my first draft if I’m the only one. Lol.
I studied real hard on the first one I was in. Didn't go anything like I expected/wanted. Now I just wing it.
Ill take Kevin Johnson