I don't think so:“Best team in the country”, regardless who you get seems ambitious, to be fair.
We didn't just hire Sal Capellini (that looks a lot like John Calipari but with a goatee) with his trusty portal rankings sheet to just take the top ranked guys on it and roll out the balls?Excellent analysis.
I like the fact that Pope recruited these guys with a specific plan in mind. He's bringing in players who fit his system not just players based on AAU stats.
We will be good both offensively and defensively.
I'm excited to see this develop into a super good team!
Analytically the thing about the roster/offense that I’m struggling to understand is we all know that outside of free throws the most efficient shots are three’s and layups. But I don’t see how we are going to consistently generate quality layups with the current roster and the offensive scheme. Butler and Oweh are average drivers and Carr has a couple of post moves. I’m not saying we won’t be able to….but I’m struggling to understand the vision.He definitely went defense heavy. Now, part of that, I think, is that by the time he got here most of the cupboard was bear for Centers. Right now, only Osobor is left (I suppose it's arguable that he's a PF, but 247 has him as a C). I think he swept up Garrison because Garrison was the best available that was a certainty.
If I'm Mark Pope, my only thought now is a distributor and/or scorer. A "go get me a bucket" kind of guy. At the end of the day I think we end up with either Jaylen Wells or Jaxson Robinson or both. Either of those guys could be that guy.
125 players spread among hundreds of schools and 1 school got 7 of them.Serious question - is 7 of the top 125 good, bad, something we should be excited about, or be disappointed in?
I know we had to rebuild an entire roster but it doesn’t seem like a top 25 type team to me.
The offense passes players open. BYU players were middling drivers. They still took half their shots at the rim.Analytically the thing about the roster/offense that I’m struggling to understand is we all know that outside of free throws the most efficient shots are three’s and layups. But I don’t see how we are going to consistently generate quality layups with the current roster and the offensive scheme. Butler and Oweh are average drivers and Carr has a couple of post moves. I’m not saying we won’t be able to….but I’m struggling to understand the vision.
I believe there is too much concern here over a player’s portal ranking. The numbers are flawed because teams do not play the same competition. For instance, DJ Wagner would have better numbers if he had played for a school in the Southern Conference.
The key to success in the portal will be coaches that know how to select the right guys and how to play them together !
Analytically the thing about the roster/offense that I’m struggling to understand is we all know that outside of free throws the most efficient shots are three’s and layups. But I don’t see how we are going to consistently generate quality layups with the current roster and the offensive scheme. Butler and Oweh are average drivers and Carr has a couple of post moves. I’m not saying we won’t be able to….but I’m struggling to understand the vision.
Thank you!This is a counterargument to Warf2012's argument that we missed on too many good players. @1war posted the Rivals transfer rankings that I think are better than the 247 sports rankings in the former post. I have done the work to put together the top 125 players in the 247sports.com based on Player Efficiency Ratings (PER), Offensive Rating per 100 possessions (ORtg), Defensive Ratings per 100 possessions (DRtg), and Overall Efficiency Rating (OERtg). OERtg is my own stat, which I arrive at by subtracting DRtg from ORtg which shows the difference between a player's excellence on offense and defense, demonstrating their overall effectiveness on both ends of the floor.
Without further ado:
Top 125 based on 2023-24 PER:
UNCOMMITTED
247 Rank---Last Name---First Name---Position---PER Rank
46 Goldin Vladislav C 31.3
86 Williams Amari C 28.5 (#2)
83 Kidd Lynn C 27.6
27 Toppin JT PF 27.4
5 Omier Norchad F 26.8
34 Haggerty PJ SG 26.5
2 Ballo Oumar C 26.4
52 White Trazarien PF 26.2
77 Thomas Saint SF 26.1
7 Osobor Great C 25.5
60 Avila Robbie C 25.1
87 Fidler Frankie SF 25.1
51 Gillespie Ja'Kobi PG 24.7
10 Lanier Chaz G 24.6
119 Dubar Darlinstone PF 24.4
108 Dell'Orso Anthony SG 24.3
6 DeVries Tucker SF 24.1
53 Ivisic Zvonomir PF 23.9
96 Dia Malik SF 23.6
1 Richmond Kadary G 23.5
19 Aidoo Jonas C 23
112 Alexis Sam C 22.8
3 Davis Johnell G 22.7
57 Stewart Sean PF 22.5
28 Wolf Danny C 22.3
123 Owusu-Anane Nana PF 22.3
12 Smith Deivon G 22.1
68 Brown Maliq PF 22
97 Sears Jordan PG 22
117 Hall Keyshawn PF 22
109 Humrichous Ben SF 21.8
13 Omoruyi Clifford C 21.7
30 Ajayi Michael SF 21.1
50 Battle Khalif SG 21.1
63 Davis Dre SF 21.1
101 Blackmon Jalen G 21.1
25 Mayo Zeke SG 20.8
69 Carr Andrew SF 20.8 (#38)
36 Tyson Cade SF 20.7
115 Lubin Ven-Allen F 20.7
107 Chinyelu Rueben C 20.4
54 Huntley-Hatfield Brandon C 20.3
61 Payne Pharrel C 20.3
76 Townsend Trey SF 20.3
99 Bilodeau Tyler PF 20.3
79 Edwards Terrence SG 20.2
29 Mack Malik PG 20.1
58 Porter Jevon PF 20.1
16 Mitchell Mark PF 20
4 Storr AJ SF 19.7
88 Conwell Ryan SG 19.7
23 Hawkins Coleman PF 19.4
55 Perkins Tony PG 19.3
100 Hill Marcus G 19.3
114 Cardet Wesley SG 19.3
67 Stojakovic Andrej SF 19.2
43 Mark Tramon SF 19.1
81 Youngblood Chris SG 19.1
14 Wells Jaylen F 18.6
21 Mitchell Dillon PF 18.6
49 Okpara Felix C 18.6
59 Dailey, Jr. Eric PF 18.6
124 Evans Ken SG 18.4
11 Roach Jeremy G 18.3
66 Pope Jordan G 18.3
89 Brea Koby G 18.3 (#66)
45 Pedulla Sean PG 18.1
121 Scott Aaron SF 18
84 Johnson Meechie SG 17.9
9 Small Javon G 17.8
22 Garrison Brandon C 17.8 (#71)
102 Davis DJ SG 17.8
106 Amos Xavier PF 17.8
31 Thiero Adou SF 17.7
72 Hoggard AJ G 17.7
122 Ausar Ezra PF 17.7
42 Bradshaw Aaron PF 17.6
95 Alexander Posh G 17.6
33 Oweh Otega SF 17.5 (#79)
118 Mallette Houston SG 17.2
73 Ledlum Chris SF 17.1
26 Rice Myles G 17
75 Pegues JP PG 16.9
90 Angel Brandon SF 16.9
56 McDaniel Dug PG 16.8
62 Gayle, Jr. Roddy G 16.4
82 Lawrence Tyrin G 16.4
35 Robinson Jaxson SF 16.3
92 Donaldson Tre G 16.1
32 Claude Desmond SG 15.9
71 Hawkins Elijah 15.9
98 Walters Sam SF 15.9
103 Hepburn Chucky G 15.9
39 Griffen Rylan 15.5
93 Gillis Mason SF 15.5
8 Johnson Kobe SF 15.2
78 Reed, Jr. Tarris C 15.2
120 Peavy Micah SF 15.2
18 Poplar Wooga SF 15.1
40 Brazile Trevon PF 15.1
44 McCollum Javian PG 15.1
70 Bamba TJ G 14.6
85 Mason Mekhi SG 14.5
80 Biliew Omaha PF 14.4
47 Butler, Jr. Lamont PG 14.3 (#105)
65 Isaacs Pop G 13.9
15 Christie Cameron SG 13.7
20 Hunter Tyrese G 13.6
24 Mahaney Aidan G 13.6
38 Boswell Kylan PG 13.6
64 Kelly Miles SG 13.3
94 Booth Carey PF 12.9
37 Wagner DJ PG 12.7
91 Clark Skyy PG 12.5
125 Kriisa Kerr G 12.1 (#115)
113 Kugel Riley PG 11.6
17 Carlyle Kanaan G 11.5
48 Uzan Milos PG 11.5
104 Dilione Freddie PG 11.4
41 Holloway Aden PG 10.9
74 Power TJ PF 10.8
105 James Bronny G 10.3
111 Middleton Scotty SF 10.1
110 Dual Garwey G 7.9
116 Yates III Wesley G
PER:
Kentucky has 7 of the top 115
Compared to:
Alabama: 3 (#58, #80, #120)
Arizona: 1 (#44)
Arkansas: 3 (#18, #21, #23)
Auburn: 1 (#83)
Baylor: 1 (#64)
California: (#56)
Creighton: 1 (#106)
Duke: 2 (#28, #95)
Florida: 2 (#22, #41)
Georgetown: 2 (#47, #98)
Georgia Tech: 1 (101)
Gonzaga: 1 (33)
Houston: 1 (118)
Illinois: 3 (31, 110, 112)
Indiana: 3 (7, 82, 117)
Kansas: 4 (37, 50, 94, 116)
Kansas St. 1 (85)
Kentucky: 7 (2, 38, 66, 71, 79, 105, 115)
Louisville: 2 (46, 93)
Loyola Marymount: 1 (48)
LSU: 1 (29)
Maryland: 1 (13)
Memphis: 2 (6, 108)
Miami: 2 (3, 36)
Michigan: 5 (1, 25, 86, 89, 92)
Michigan St.: 1 (12)
Mississippi: 3 (19, 35, 67)
Missouri: 2 (49, 53)
NC State: 2 (42, 54)
Ohio St.: 2 (69, 77)
Oregon: 1 (84)
Penn St.: 1 (119)
Providence: 1 (55)
Saint Louis: 1 (11)
Seton Hall: 1 (123)
St. John's: 1 (68)
Tennessee: 2 (15, 61)
Texas: 2 (57, 65)
Texas A&M: 1 (43)
Texas Tech: 1 (91)
UCF: 1 (30)
UCLA: 4 (45, 62, 96, 114)
UCONN: 2 (97, 109)
UNC: 1 (39)
USC: 1 (9)
Wake Forest: 1 (104)
Washington: 1 (103)
West Virginia: 2 (17, 70)
Wisconsin: 1 (73)
Xavier: 1 (51)
Some who compare with UK highlighted.
Offensive Rating to follow.
No. So I'll bump; maybe it hasn't noticed the post yet...So did Barf ever respond to this post?
Or looking at the 3 to 6 games a guy plays against p5 conf teams and see if they play better against better comp or worse... I've seen several guys in the portal were mentioned as having their best games against their best opponents.I believe there is too much concern here over a player’s portal ranking. The numbers are flawed because teams do not play the same competition. For instance, DJ Wagner would have better numbers if he had played for a school in the Southern Conference. The key to success in the portal will be coaches that know how to select the right guys and how to play them together as a team
That was what I saw. BYU had guys getting wide open layups. We get a guy like Poplar and you'll see some insane dunks.The offense passes players open. BYU players were middling drivers. They still took half their shots at the rim.
RELAX
Pretty impressive considering we had to get a whole roster out of the transfer portal for the most part.
Analytically the thing about the roster/offense that I’m struggling to understand is we all know that outside of free throws the most efficient shots are three’s and layups. But I don’t see how we are going to consistently generate quality layups with the current roster and the offensive scheme. Butler and Oweh are average drivers and Carr has a couple of post moves. I’m not saying we won’t be able to….but I’m struggling to understand the vision.
Absolutely, excellent work Eight_Banners.@Eight_Banners just solidified himself as one of our most valuable posters.
Good research. I love this type of stuff.
That was what I saw. BYU had guys getting wide open layups. We get a guy like Poplar and you'll see some insane dunks.
I appreciate it. I definitely spent a lot of time on it, but I was just tired of taking at face value the rankings from these various sites. With high school rankings it's kind of a crap shoot. Yeah, there are Anthony Davis-type players every now and then (Zion, KD, KAT, Nerlens, etc.), but at the end of the day, any of the top 100 players could become and unsuspecting star or dud.@Eight_Banners just solidified himself as one of our most valuable posters.
Good research. I love this type of stuff.
WOW!!!! The amount of work you put into all of this is absolutely INCREDIBLE!!! I can't thank you enough. I appreciate all of the work and time involved in the research, organizing that research, entering the information in a way that is easy to follow and understand. Since I know less than the posters on this board and I am trying to understand things that are sometimes over my head, I personally appreciate this easy to follow information. You are, by the way, one of those posters on here that I have the utmost respect for.This is a counterargument to Warf2012's argument that we missed on too many good players. @1war posted the Rivals transfer rankings that I think are better than the 247 sports rankings in the former post. I have done the work to put together the top 125 players in the 247sports.com based on Player Efficiency Ratings (PER), Offensive Rating per 100 possessions (ORtg), Defensive Ratings per 100 possessions (DRtg), and Overall Efficiency Rating (OERtg). OERtg is my own stat, which I arrive at by subtracting DRtg from ORtg which shows the difference between a player's excellence on offense and defense, demonstrating their overall effectiveness on both ends of the floor.
Without further ado:
Top 125 based on 2023-24 PER:
UNCOMMITTED
247 Rank---Last Name---First Name---Position---PER Rank
46 Goldin Vladislav C 31.3
86 Williams Amari C 28.5 (#2)
83 Kidd Lynn C 27.6
27 Toppin JT PF 27.4
5 Omier Norchad F 26.8
34 Haggerty PJ SG 26.5
2 Ballo Oumar C 26.4
52 White Trazarien PF 26.2
77 Thomas Saint SF 26.1
7 Osobor Great C 25.5
60 Avila Robbie C 25.1
87 Fidler Frankie SF 25.1
51 Gillespie Ja'Kobi PG 24.7
10 Lanier Chaz G 24.6
119 Dubar Darlinstone PF 24.4
108 Dell'Orso Anthony SG 24.3
6 DeVries Tucker SF 24.1
53 Ivisic Zvonomir PF 23.9
96 Dia Malik SF 23.6
1 Richmond Kadary G 23.5
19 Aidoo Jonas C 23
112 Alexis Sam C 22.8
3 Davis Johnell G 22.7
57 Stewart Sean PF 22.5
28 Wolf Danny C 22.3
123 Owusu-Anane Nana PF 22.3
12 Smith Deivon G 22.1
68 Brown Maliq PF 22
97 Sears Jordan PG 22
117 Hall Keyshawn PF 22
109 Humrichous Ben SF 21.8
13 Omoruyi Clifford C 21.7
30 Ajayi Michael SF 21.1
50 Battle Khalif SG 21.1
63 Davis Dre SF 21.1
101 Blackmon Jalen G 21.1
25 Mayo Zeke SG 20.8
69 Carr Andrew SF 20.8 (#38)
36 Tyson Cade SF 20.7
115 Lubin Ven-Allen F 20.7
107 Chinyelu Rueben C 20.4
54 Huntley-Hatfield Brandon C 20.3
61 Payne Pharrel C 20.3
76 Townsend Trey SF 20.3
99 Bilodeau Tyler PF 20.3
79 Edwards Terrence SG 20.2
29 Mack Malik PG 20.1
58 Porter Jevon PF 20.1
16 Mitchell Mark PF 20
4 Storr AJ SF 19.7
88 Conwell Ryan SG 19.7
23 Hawkins Coleman PF 19.4
55 Perkins Tony PG 19.3
100 Hill Marcus G 19.3
114 Cardet Wesley SG 19.3
67 Stojakovic Andrej SF 19.2
43 Mark Tramon SF 19.1
81 Youngblood Chris SG 19.1
14 Wells Jaylen F 18.6
21 Mitchell Dillon PF 18.6
49 Okpara Felix C 18.6
59 Dailey, Jr. Eric PF 18.6
124 Evans Ken SG 18.4
11 Roach Jeremy G 18.3
66 Pope Jordan G 18.3
89 Brea Koby G 18.3 (#66)
45 Pedulla Sean PG 18.1
121 Scott Aaron SF 18
84 Johnson Meechie SG 17.9
9 Small Javon G 17.8
22 Garrison Brandon C 17.8 (#71)
102 Davis DJ SG 17.8
106 Amos Xavier PF 17.8
31 Thiero Adou SF 17.7
72 Hoggard AJ G 17.7
122 Ausar Ezra PF 17.7
42 Bradshaw Aaron PF 17.6
95 Alexander Posh G 17.6
33 Oweh Otega SF 17.5 (#79)
118 Mallette Houston SG 17.2
73 Ledlum Chris SF 17.1
26 Rice Myles G 17
75 Pegues JP PG 16.9
90 Angel Brandon SF 16.9
56 McDaniel Dug PG 16.8
62 Gayle, Jr. Roddy G 16.4
82 Lawrence Tyrin G 16.4
35 Robinson Jaxson SF 16.3
92 Donaldson Tre G 16.1
32 Claude Desmond SG 15.9
71 Hawkins Elijah 15.9
98 Walters Sam SF 15.9
103 Hepburn Chucky G 15.9
39 Griffen Rylan 15.5
93 Gillis Mason SF 15.5
8 Johnson Kobe SF 15.2
78 Reed, Jr. Tarris C 15.2
120 Peavy Micah SF 15.2
18 Poplar Wooga SF 15.1
40 Brazile Trevon PF 15.1
44 McCollum Javian PG 15.1
70 Bamba TJ G 14.6
85 Mason Mekhi SG 14.5
80 Biliew Omaha PF 14.4
47 Butler, Jr. Lamont PG 14.3 (#105)
65 Isaacs Pop G 13.9
15 Christie Cameron SG 13.7
20 Hunter Tyrese G 13.6
24 Mahaney Aidan G 13.6
38 Boswell Kylan PG 13.6
64 Kelly Miles SG 13.3
94 Booth Carey PF 12.9
37 Wagner DJ PG 12.7
91 Clark Skyy PG 12.5
125 Kriisa Kerr G 12.1 (#115)
113 Kugel Riley PG 11.6
17 Carlyle Kanaan G 11.5
48 Uzan Milos PG 11.5
104 Dilione Freddie PG 11.4
41 Holloway Aden PG 10.9
74 Power TJ PF 10.8
105 James Bronny G 10.3
111 Middleton Scotty SF 10.1
110 Dual Garwey G 7.9
116 Yates III Wesley G
PER:
Kentucky has 7 of the top 115
Compared to:
Alabama: 3 (#58, #80, #120)
Arizona: 1 (#44)
Arkansas: 3 (#18, #21, #23)
Auburn: 1 (#83)
Baylor: 1 (#64)
California: (#56)
Creighton: 1 (#106)
Duke: 2 (#28, #95)
Florida: 2 (#22, #41)
Georgetown: 2 (#47, #98)
Georgia Tech: 1 (101)
Gonzaga: 1 (33)
Houston: 1 (118)
Illinois: 3 (31, 110, 112)
Indiana: 3 (7, 82, 117)
Kansas: 4 (37, 50, 94, 116)
Kansas St. 1 (85)
Kentucky: 7 (2, 38, 66, 71, 79, 105, 115)
Louisville: 2 (46, 93)
Loyola Marymount: 1 (48)
LSU: 1 (29)
Maryland: 1 (13)
Memphis: 2 (6, 108)
Miami: 2 (3, 36)
Michigan: 5 (1, 25, 86, 89, 92)
Michigan St.: 1 (12)
Mississippi: 3 (19, 35, 67)
Missouri: 2 (49, 53)
NC State: 2 (42, 54)
Ohio St.: 2 (69, 77)
Oregon: 1 (84)
Penn St.: 1 (119)
Providence: 1 (55)
Saint Louis: 1 (11)
Seton Hall: 1 (123)
St. John's: 1 (68)
Tennessee: 2 (15, 61)
Texas: 2 (57, 65)
Texas A&M: 1 (43)
Texas Tech: 1 (91)
UCF: 1 (30)
UCLA: 4 (45, 62, 96, 114)
UCONN: 2 (97, 109)
UNC: 1 (39)
USC: 1 (9)
Wake Forest: 1 (104)
Washington: 1 (103)
West Virginia: 2 (17, 70)
Wisconsin: 1 (73)
Xavier: 1 (51)
Some who compare with UK highlighted.
Offensive Rating to follow.
Portal Rankings based on ORtg:
247 Ranks Last Name First Name Position Ortg Rating ORtg
93 Gillis Mason SF 1 137.4
68 Brown Maliq PF 2 135
Ditto...8 banners reminds me of a young AikeI just want to say and I’m sure I’m not alone the appreciation of you for diving into the analytics and research you do. Thank you.
Yeah. Give me Jaylen Wells over Jaxson Robinson. The primary advantage Robinson has over other players is knowing Pope's system.One thing that stood out to me is how low Jaxson Robinson is on these lists.
I truly appreciate that. I find that trying to rank college players who already have experience and statistics in college basketball is much easier than trying to rank high school players. As with any type of ranking there are certainly going to be outliers and things unaccounted for. However, using a player's metrics compared with others has to account for something, and I am hopeful that this information gives us good indication of what we are getting in these new players.WOW!!!! The amount of work you put into all of this is absolutely INCREDIBLE!!! I can't thank you enough. I appreciate all of the work and time involved in the research, organizing that research, entering the information in a way that is easy to follow and understand. Since I know less than the posters on this board and I am trying to understand things that are sometimes over my head, I personally appreciate this easy to follow information. You are, by the way, one of those posters on here that I have the utmost respect for.
GO BIG BLUE AND
COACH POPE, TOO!!!💙💙💙
I think Duke is going to be really good. Though they did lose a lot of players to the transfer portal.Duke got #1 and #2. I didn't notice that. They will be really good next year with the 2 returnees and the freshman class.