bigblueinsanity said:

I say lucky because he could never win a national election and was therefore of little political value other than what he provided. No other gop presidential candidate needed to connect with the religious right so he really only held value for one person.



Yes but that isn't always a bad thing. Thought provoking and providing platforms are interesting. Making Hitler anything other than a heinous evil being is much beyond that imo. That goes beyond controversy and hurts his credibility with the casual viewer.

Click to expand...

"was therefore of little political value other than what he provided." How does that make him lucky? Seems he provided exactly what was wanted of him.

TC has always tried walking on the edge of saying what he could get by with w/o causing high backlash - causing his employer problems - vs. what you tell was really underneath but couldn't say. I watched his old program a few times & I realized he was too kooky for me. Intelligent? Yes. Smart? Not so much.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

Wouldn't be shocked at all if ABC said two days before they would unmute the mics. Also, the woman who gave Hillary the debate questions in 2016 now works at ABC.

Login to view embedded media




Login to view embedded media

Dore95 said:

You and the others on here lump together everyone who is not a Trump fan as "leftists" or whatever nonsense. The people who will decide this election are those who see this as a choice between two flawed candidates.

Anyway, one reason I can't in good conscious vote for Harris is her extreme anti-business position. She paraded around with union groups on Monday and repeatedly endorsed the "Pro Act" which is the most pro-union (and anti-business) piece of legislation imaginable.

Click to expand...

Each election....both candidates are flawed in some fashion. Every one. However, in this one, we already have a balance sheet of what one candidate did for our country vs. what is taking place now.

On this thread, the anti-Trumpers are pretty much leftists, although perhaps not as extreme as those you see on TV and in the media. It is hardly nonsense.

Anyway...I appreciate your last paragraph of honesty.

vhcat70 said:

Agree other than I don't know that he was lucky to get as far as he did because of how maligned he's been for doing his job Jan. 6, 2021. Good, honest man. At least Indiana appreciated that.

Click to expand...

I say lucky because he could never win a national election and was therefore of little political value other than what he provided. No other gop presidential candidate needed to connect with the religious right so he really only held value for one person.

vhcat70 said:

Way out there has been my take on TC for a long time.

Click to expand...

Yes but that isn't always a bad thing. Thought provoking and providing platforms are interesting. Making Hitler anything other than a heinous evil being is much beyond that imo. That goes beyond controversy and hurts his credibility with the casual viewer.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

When I was 12 years old, my mother told me to learn to enjoy work because I’d be doing it the rest of my life. Shortly afterwards I was picking green beans in our garden. I told mom that I tried like Hell to enjoy picking those damn beans, but my back hurt way too much.

Didn’t mind working in hay or tobacco.

Don't work yourself into a shoot, brother.

augustaky1 said:

Thanks. I for one had the impression that the Trump organization itself is huge.

However, would it be more correct to think they contract out most of the day-to-day, or construction work?

Click to expand...

If even that. The craziest thing about the liberal NPC machine turning against trump - trump used to be a literal case study for anyone negotiating or going into property/property law/transaction law. His book the art of the deal was literally assigned reading when i was in law school.

Trump made or makes money by 1) taking over existing distressed but historically great properties and revamping them 2) finding a great location and hiring a contractor to build an incredible property 3) adding his name to an ongoing build to increase presales and prices.

In every single situation or project he has these things in common 1) financing was always using someone else's money. He never risked anything. That meant he got less of a cut but everything was always pure profit with zero risk. 2) turning the management of the finished project over to someone else. That meant every bit of work hed ever do was all front loaded. When it was built he would hire a property management company for a cut of rents and he was off to the next deal. 3) massively cutting costs through negotiating down costs of everything and negotiating up the revenue coming in.

Its pretty incredible and thats just the basics but his business model was ingenious. Was basically him and a super small team that spent other people's money and made everyone rich while he incurred no risk other than to his brand. Once his brand reached a certain level, he could charge a piece of the total project just to add his name. Thats why adding a financial value to his name has literal basis in fact.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

sambowieshin said:

So over 200 former Trump staffers and his former VP are endorsing Harris over Trump but they are the problem.... Not Trump?
Ok Culty C. Culter. 😂

More than 200 former Republican presidential staffers sign open letter endorsing Harris over Trump

More than 200 staffers for four previous Republican presidential nominees have endorsed Democrat Kamala Harris' White House bid

abcnews.go.com

Click to expand...

False. It says 200 former staffers of past Republican presidential nominees...not 200 of Trump's staffers. Did they put their names to it or is this just one of those "confidential" resources?

Do you even try to hide lies or just think nobody will notice?

Greta: "The environment can go to hell when it's time to kill the Jews"


Login to view embedded media

cole854 said:

Has Dion, Sam, Dore, or Dread listed and analyzed Kamala's policies/platform yet? Or is it simply TDS 24/7?

Click to expand...

You and the others on here lump together everyone who is not a Trump fan as "leftists" or whatever nonsense. The people who will decide this election are those who see this as a choice between two flawed candidates.

Anyway, one reason I can't in good conscious vote for Harris is her extreme anti-business position. She paraded around with union groups on Monday and repeatedly endorsed the "Pro Act" which is the most pro-union (and anti-business) piece of legislation imaginable.

thebluestripes said:

I guess the reason cal did ok there is because he fit right in at that place

Click to expand...

Well he did have to vacate wins and the second final four in his career. So maybe there was a reason he did okay.

screwduke1 said:

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

bigblueinsanity said:

Pence reminds me of kasich.

Click to expand...

Shows you how 'rock solid' conservative that whole group of 'conservative' Repubs were back in the 90s when Newt and the rest of them would do their speeches on C-Span in the empty chamber at night. While it worked to get Rs elected to Congress...time has shown that weren't/aren't 'conservative' Republicans.

Pence, Kasich, Asa Hutchison....and probably more. Would throw McCain in with this group as well, but he was in the Senate.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

Some are so TDS enraged, they simply will not look at the policies affecting this country, and that is the only reason they are voting for Kamala.....who has done nothing but put this country in peril from day one. Fine...if your hatred is such that you are willing to sacrifice the good of the nation because of your ill will towards Trump, then have at it.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

Sure would be nice to hear from Tommy and BBdK on this shit. Their silence is DEAFENING.

It’s real easy to say “well, I’d only give 1-2 year extensions”…

It’s not a normal workforce. If a salesman under performs, there’s hundreds of thousands eager to replace him. How many football coaches are there that have experience and can win consistently high level programs? Maybe 30-40 at any given time.

Plus, all these guys talk. The first university to not give you a nice buyout and only offer a few years, welp, now you’ve got a rep for being cheap. Say goodbye to any chance at an in demand guy. Literally what UK is doing right now with Stoops is establishing that we will pay top dollar and we will give you a favorable contract and we will give you a real chance.

It’s like a QB in the NFL. You don’t know if he’ll be the guy, but you know you cannot win without a guy, so all the leverage goes to them.

That being said I think salaries may go down in the next decade or so, seeing as now that you can pay players, maybe a top level coach isn’t as valuable as it used to be.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

How can this be?

Login to view embedded media
Because we all know that......