ADVERTISEMENT

Wow, Shep -9 on plus/minus?

HerrosHeroes

All-American
Aug 16, 2018
25,608
35,591
113
39.10 Minutes played-led team
25 pts-led team
9 boards led team
6 assists-led team
2 steals-tied for lead
O fouls

He did have 3 TOs but damn, tough crowd!

Defense must be factored in but isnt shown on the box score.

How else ls Dillingham just -7
1 of 9
4 TOs
2 pts
4 fouls
4 rebs
3 assists
1 steal

Rob did not play great D either.

What am I missing here?
 
  • Like
Reactions: chevyman 50
What’s the question? They lost by 7 and he played almost the entire game. Did people expect him to be in the (+) column?

People are grossly misunderstanding this stat this year. What happened?
Ok, so you explained that minutes played is a huge factor but damn the guy was easily the best player on the court for either team and he gets a -9?
 
No one is explaining it cause no one truely knows. Its easy to be a SA and “alot” of you guys are great at it!
 
Someone explain this + / - stat. Seems to be the fad this year. Kinda like “boundary” with football
The defintion is a sports statistic used to measure a player's impact, represented by the difference between their team's total scoring versus their opponent's when the player is in the game.

Basically if you come in and cost your team points, each player on the floor will be negative that point total for while you are in. Vice versa, if you come in and your team goes ahead +5 or so.
 
Is this a joke?
No! sheppard was easily the best player on the floor! Look at the box score!
No way he deserves a minus 9!
This stat will be gone with the wind soon enough.
How Dillingham was -7 with his line and Shep was -9 with his is laughable.
Too much emphasis put on PT.
Its absurd.
 
No! sheppard was easily the best player on the floor! Look at the box score!
No way he deserves a minus 9!
This stat will be gone with the wind soon enough.
How Dillingham was -7 with his line and Shep was -9 with his is laughable.
Too much emphasis put on PT.
Its absurd.
We got to change the system man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UK90
39.10 Minutes played-led team
25 pts-led team
9 boards led team
6 assists-led team
2 steals-tied for lead
O fouls

He did have 3 TOs but damn, tough crowd!

Defense must be factored in but isnt shown on the box score.

How else ls Dillingham just -7
1 of 9
4 TOs
2 pts
4 fouls
4 rebs
3 assists
1 steal

Rob did not play great D either.

What am I missing here?
There’s no calculation. +\- is simply how the score changes when you’re on the court.

If Reed plays 1 minute and we go up by 5 in that minute, he’s +5. It doesn’t matter if he has 20 points and 15 rebounds or if he has zero’s across the board.

If he plays 20 minutes and during the minute he plays, we are a net negative 20, then he’s -20. Doesn’t matter what the rest of his stats are.

He could play a minute , Reeves hit 3 3’a and Reed is +9. That’s why the stat isn’t the end all be all some have made it out to be.
 
There’s no calculation. +\- is simply how the score changes when you’re on the court.

If Reed plays 1 minute and we go up by 5 in that minute, he’s +5. It doesn’t matter if he has 20 points and 15 rebounds or if he has zero’s across the board.

If he plays 20 minutes and during the minute he plays, we are a net negative 20, then he’s -20. Doesn’t matter what the rest of his stats are.

He could play a minute , Reeves hit 3 3’a and Reed is +9. That’s why the stat isn’t the end all be all some have made it out to be.
Thank you. Silly silly stat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cats192
Edwards had a lot to do with the loss. And not having DJ didn’t help. Shep did his usual awesome job with some of the guys blowing past him, but damn he was all over the place.

There has to be some credit given to UNCW. They balled. And some credit (negative) given to these refs. They were pretty horrible.

Not sure what Cal could have done differently today, and I’m as skeptical about his dumb ass as anyone. But we came out lethargic and Edwards sucked. Badly.
 
Edwards had a lot to do with the loss. And not having DJ didn’t help. Shep did his usual awesome job with some of the guys blowing past him, but damn he was all over the place.

There has to be some credit given to UNCW. They balled. And some credit (negative) given to these refs. They were pretty horrible.

Not sure what Cal could have done differently today, and I’m as skeptical about his dumb ass as anyone. But we came out lethargic and Edwards sucked. Badly.
Great post.

We didn’t guard them well on a lot of shots. But damn they hit some tough ones. That’s why you gotta play defense on every possession.
 
Edwards had a lot to do with the loss. And not having DJ didn’t help. Shep did his usual awesome job with some of the guys blowing past him, but damn he was all over the place.

There has to be some credit given to UNCW. They balled. And some credit (negative) given to these refs. They were pretty horrible.

Not sure what Cal could have done differently today, and I’m as skeptical about his dumb ass as anyone. But we came out lethargic and Edwards sucked. Badly.
So did Dillingham. We can survive one of them sucking but not both of them!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDude73
If you play 40 minutes and you lose by 5 you're -5.

It's not an exotic statistic. It's a handwaving statistic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chase4UK
We really need to do away with this whole plus/minus stuff. It's becoming wayyyyy overblown here.

Cal even used it during his presser when talking about Bradshaw smfh
 
  • Like
Reactions: FitchandMurray29
No! sheppard was easily the best player on the floor! Look at the box score!
No way he deserves a minus 9!
This stat will be gone with the wind soon enough.
How Dillingham was -7 with his line and Shep was -9 with his is laughable.
Too much emphasis put on PT.
Its absurd.
You. Do. Not. Get. It.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UK90
Ok, so you explained that minutes played is a huge factor but damn the guy was easily the best player on the court for either team and he gets a -9?
The calculation is based on the actual score when the player is in the game. Example: Reed starts the game and the score is 0/0, Reed leaves the game when we are down 7. Reed is then -7 in the efficiency rating. Reed comes back in after 1 minute and plays the rest of the first and we fall behind by an additional 1 point half the half. Reed is -8 at that point in the game.

The efficiency rating is determined by scoring differential while a player is in the game

Your team could be losing by 100 points and the coach puts a player in the game in the last seconds of a game. The player hits a 3 pointer as the horn sounds. The player’s efficiency rating is +3 even though the team loses by 97 points
 
  • Like
Reactions: YardCat and CGblue
Sheppard played 39 minutes and we lost. So yeah, his +- will be negative. That’s how the stat works.
 
39.10 Minutes played-led team
25 pts-led team
9 boards led team
6 assists-led team
2 steals-tied for lead
O fouls

He did have 3 TOs but damn, tough crowd!

Defense must be factored in but isnt shown on the box score.

How else ls Dillingham just -7
1 of 9
4 TOs
2 pts
4 fouls
4 rebs
3 assists
1 steal

Rob did not play great D either.

What am I missing here?
Nobody played great D today. The team was flat and threw a clunker. Couldn’t get defensive stops down the stretch, couldn’t get any offensive rebounds, no second chances. Too many fouls, couldn’t hit point blank shots right under the basket. Outside of Reed, 3 point shooting was non existent. Defense missed Wagner. This loss was a team effort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ib4ky
Ok, so you explained that minutes played is a huge factor but damn the guy was easily the best player on the court for either team and he gets a -9?
Yeesh. You’ve been loudly boasting about Reed’s plus/minus all week long …yet appears you don’t even slightly understand what that even means.

Reed played essentially the entire game tonight …39 out of the 40 minutes … and we lost by seven. How could anyone not get why that translates to a negative plus/minus?
 
  • Like
Reactions: megablue
Its possible to + on a losing team. Usually its just one guy though in a loss. Everybody else is shit
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT