Consistency is the problem. You could literally call a foul every play...so what makes him decide to call a breathing foul one play and not another. Like let's say calling bam for an offensive foul on a put back but not Meeks sitting on Hawkins shoulders for a rebound. Or driving in and getting hammered but then a chase down block called a foul on fox. You cpuld call both a foul..why was one called and one not? Refs have the same excuse regardless call a touch foul, "Well it's in the rules so" let someone get murdered "we'll let the players decide it"That NW call was not even subjective. 1000 out of 1000 people would agree that was a goal tend.
That is not the case with our game. All of the UNC fans I've spoken to seem to think they were not given an advantage. The closest to not-objective call was the Bam goal-tend call, and even the announcers were split (I think 2 said "not" and 1 said "was").
There was an obvious consistency problem going on here with how calls changed in the second half. Read Twitter of any media analyst from half time. If your gonna call monk for moving his hands around the ball handler you can't let kennedy Meeks dive into somebody going up for two in the other end. Stop when the nonsense well we are gonna focus on this...call the same way every game.