Yep. And they recommended mask wearing to control it. The reason the japanese have to use masks is because of how densely populated the island is.
Yep. And they recommended mask wearing to control it. The reason the japanese have to use masks is because of how densely populated the island is.
No...they have used masks for years, and I am very well aware of the Japanese geography/culture.
It's absurd to me to even type something that people literally believe is true.
At this rate barring a vaccine I guess our best option is herd immunity. As many get it as possible and hope it weakens as time goes on and deaths are mitigated.
You've never been able to see your breath in the winter? When you see a LOT of breath with no mask, then hardly any with the mask, don't you think that also means that the viral RNA attached to those moisture particles is also mostly contained? You should, because it is.Didn't know anyone had good enough vision to see something 50 -150 nanometers in size. About as true as a cloth mask stopping it.
I would say yes since the common cold is in fact a coronavirus.Do you believe masks also reduce the spread of both influenza and the common cold?
So I’m assuming you advocate continuously wearing masks from here on out, correct?There is strong evidence that they do. Japan and their use of masks is the best example of this.
However, a cold can be spread through the "air". The flu is typically thought to just be spread through dropletts similar to what is throught to be the main spreader of covid.
Then my question to you is the same as to goukats — I assume you advocate wearing masks continuously, correct?I would say yes since the common cold is in fact a coronavirus.
However, those aren't as contagious as this virus (nor as deadly, contrary to political agenda malarkey data), so people don't wear masks.
If we all wore masks for 6-8 months, and it helped with the novel coronavirus, wouldn't it be a hoot if we also kicked the common head cold and flu?
You're extrapolating numbers with no regard to demographics. Also, that "70%" assumes zero t-cell or cross-immunity from other coronavirus strains.Herd immunity requires 70% of the world population to be exposed/get sick to work (let's ignore the fact that there are several thousand cases of people becoming reinfected, with symptoms, a second time). Let's see how that would look, numbers-wise.
World population: 7.8 billion
70% of world population required to be infected for herd immunity: 5.46 billion
Current worldwide COVID fatality rate: 4.5% (US currently is around 4.21%, give or take due to errors in data reporting).
Number of expected worldwide deaths (sacrificial lambs) to achieve "herd immunity": 245.6 million (1 in 32 humans on earth)
US population: 328.2 million
70% of US population required to be infected to achieve herd immunity: 229.7 million
Number of expected US deaths (sacrificial lambs) to achieve "herd immunity" (US "herd immunity" 70% of sick population x current US death rate of 4.21%): 9.7 million
So if we all just go crazy, no masks, kick up sports, bars, beaches, churches, and go back to pre-pandemic behaviors, all in the name of "herd immunity", we should only expect to see 9.7 million of our fellow Americans die, assuming herd immunity even works for this virus.
NUTSHELL: This poster is advocating that we sacrifice roughly 1 out of 34 Americans (and 1/32 humans on earth) for herd immunity. If that happened, we'd all easily know someone that died from COVID, we'd have no hospital space, and there'd be an uprising of morticians and crematories like we've never seen.
They kill 10s of thousands in a situation where we don't shut down, stay at home, or wear masks. COVID spread and killed twice as many as the flu, in a lesser time period (and still spreads even in summer, unlike the flu and head cold), and we had mass shut downs and a good percentage of people social distancing and wearing masks. Imagine the numbers if we acted like the coronavirus was just the regular old flu?Then my question to you is the same as to goukats — I assume you advocate wearing masks continuously, correct?
By the way, it doesn’t matter if they (the flu and cold) aren’t as contagious or deadly as COVID-19, there is no dispute that they still kill tens of thousands of people every year. Wouldn’t you agree that if we can decrease deaths from any respiratory virus to any degree by simply wearing masks forever that it’s worth it? If not, why not?
I didn't extrapolate, I just pulled total world and US populations and applied the herd immunity % and then the current statistical death rates from a non-partisan, data-only stats website currently tracking the data. Yes, I know there are stories of deaths being incorrectly reported as COVID when it could be something else (but I don't believe the conspiracy that hospitals are all doing this to scam insurance and get reimbursed - get caught and say hello to prison). But even if the 4.21% death rate is half that, and considering it's clear this coronavirus doesn't appear to be concerned about hot, humid, dry or other kind of weather (like the flu, which propagates mainly during the fall, winter and early spring seasons), does it matter that instead of 1 out of 32 people dead is 1 out of 64, or even 1 out of 100? Some people are still asking Americans to buckle up and pray to god that they aren't involved in a mass human sacrifice just to get through "herd immunity".You're extrapolating numbers with no regard to demographics. Also, that "70%" assumes zero t-cell or cross-immunity from other coronavirus strains.
Sooooo...do you advocate wearing masks forever or not? If not, then you're saying that it's ok to let some people die from the flu and colds.They kill 10s of thousands in a situation where we don't shut down, stay at home, or wear masks. COVID spread and killed twice as many as the flu, in a lesser time period (and still spreads even in summer, unlike the flu and head cold), and we had mass shut downs and a good percentage of people social distancing and wearing masks. Imagine the numbers if we acted like the coronavirus was just the regular old flu?
I advocate focusing on this virus because it's transmission rate seems to be much higher than any other we've seen. When a handful of people go to a bar and more than 200 leave infected (the Michigan case), that's heads and tails above what the flu does during say being at the bar on New Year's Eve during the height of flu season. When was the last time we've heard of people going into a bar and the majority contracting influenza (not that we've ever contact traced or tested for the flu like we do for the coronavirus, but it would still probably make the news if 200 people visited a bar and days later all had the flu - some of which were hospitalized and/or died).
Only reason I see some credence in gov't pushing people to do it is on display in this thread - we have people that just don't give a rats ass about others and think the whole thing is a farce - something of a conspiracy that somehow the entire planet is caught up in - and it's because of those people that the gov't feels like they have to force us to do it to protect ourselves. Remember when they made us wear seatbelts in the 80s to protect ourselves from ourselves? Where was the outrage then? I freaking hated them, but we had to wear 'em! Now I feel like something isn't right without it, and our kids almost break into tears if we start moving the car before they're buckled in!
I hate gov't intervention, but the fact of the matter remains - if people behaved responsibly, as a whole, we'd not need government for anything. It's those lone bad apples that ruin it for the rest of us.
I didn't extrapolate, I just pulled total world and US populations and applied the herd immunity % and then the current statistical death rates from a non-partisan, data-only stats website currently tracking the data. Yes, I know there are stories of deaths being incorrectly reported as COVID when it could be something else (but I don't believe the conspiracy that hospitals are all doing this to scam insurance and get reimbursed - get caught and say hello to prison). But even if the 4.21% death rate is half that, and considering it's clear this coronavirus doesn't appear to be concerned about hot, humid, dry or other kind of weather (like the flu, which propagates mainly during the fall, winter and early spring seasons), does it matter that instead of 1 out of 32 people dead is 1 out of 64, or even 1 out of 100? Some people are still asking Americans to buckle up and pray to god that they aren't involved in a mass human sacrifice just to get through "herd immunity".
Let's not forget - herd immunity is nothing more than the lazy way out. Just keep going status quo because anything else is just too damned hard and annoying (e.g., we're lazy and set in our ways).
I didn't extrapolate, I just pulled total world and US populations and applied the herd immunity % and then the current statistical death rates from a non-partisan, data-only stats website currently tracking the data. Yes, I know there are stories of deaths being incorrectly reported as COVID when it could be something else (but I don't believe the conspiracy that hospitals are all doing this to scam insurance and get reimbursed - get caught and say hello to prison). But even if the 4.21% death rate is half that, and considering it's clear this coronavirus doesn't appear to be concerned about hot, humid, dry or other kind of weather (like the flu, which propagates mainly during the fall, winter and early spring seasons), does it matter that instead of 1 out of 32 people dead is 1 out of 64, or even 1 out of 100? Some people are still asking Americans to buckle up and pray to god that they aren't involved in a mass human sacrifice just to get through "herd immunity".
Let's not forget - herd immunity is nothing more than the lazy way out. Just keep going status quo because anything else is just too damned hard and annoying (e.g., we're lazy and set in our ways).
I wonder if the millions of nurses, doctors and health professionals know this. Plus another gozillion Asians?
Herd immunity is the only way out. Either by infection or vaccine. Vaccines for coronavirus types haven't been around despite decades of work on them. Even if every living person on earth wore a mask 24/7 the virus will run it's course.I didn't extrapolate, I just pulled total world and US populations and applied the herd immunity % and then the current statistical death rates from a non-partisan, data-only stats website currently tracking the data. Yes, I know there are stories of deaths being incorrectly reported as COVID when it could be something else (but I don't believe the conspiracy that hospitals are all doing this to scam insurance and get reimbursed - get caught and say hello to prison). But even if the 4.21% death rate is half that, and considering it's clear this coronavirus doesn't appear to be concerned about hot, humid, dry or other kind of weather (like the flu, which propagates mainly during the fall, winter and early spring seasons), does it matter that instead of 1 out of 32 people dead is 1 out of 64, or even 1 out of 100? Some people are still asking Americans to buckle up and pray to god that they aren't involved in a mass human sacrifice just to get through "herd immunity".
Let's not forget - herd immunity is nothing more than the lazy way out. Just keep going status quo because anything else is just too damned hard and annoying (e.g., we're lazy and set in our ways).
That's the thing though, the governor is an elected official. If he violates the law, the people and the attorney can remove him. He cannot create a mandate that cannot be overturned by the legislature or judicial branch. There's a reason the injunction was filed in the courts. Ole andy cannot control the state.
That is an nbc source, and they did the typical "it's going to another new york" spiel. I'm not saying there's not some merit, but this has been sensationalized by media types.
poor guessThe healthcare professionals wear them properly though.
I'm guessing less than 10% of the US population that does wear them actually use an effective mask and when they do they are not used correctly.
I hate gov't intervention, but the fact of the matter remains - if people behaved responsibly, as a whole, we'd not need government for anything. It's those lone bad apples that ruin it for the rest of us.
Even if every living person on earth wore a mask 24/7 the virus will run it's course.
we have people that just don't give a rats ass about others and think the whole thing is a farce - something of a conspiracy that somehow the entire planet is caught up in
Or they would’ve blamed Roosevelt for putting embargoes on Japan, giving them no other option.If this current generation of the cynics had lived in December of 1941, they wouldn’t have believed Pearl Harbor was real, until a Jap walked up and bit ‘em on the ass!
Not to mention that same media is now screaming about hospitals and ICUs being overrun without telling you that hospitals and ICUs run as close to max capacity as they can at normal times, and that a very small percentage of said current surge is from COVID patients, or that many of the "positive" tests are re-tests or asymptomatic or assumed positives or antibody positives.Because it’s not illegal, the Cares act pays them and the CDC cleared it by changing standards to suspected Covid. It’s literally not against the law right now to try and scam the system to see what a hospital or state can get away with.
Part of the reason is because the govt made hospitals essentially shutdown for 3 months, cutting off their means of income.
The problem is media and politicians saying we’ve failed so horribly compared to other nations, when we directed hospitals to claim all they can as Covid.
Or they would’ve blamed Roosevelt for putting embargoes on Japan, giving them no other option.
I think cruise ships are floating death traps, boredom traps, nickel and dime traps anymoreAs far the actual death rate is concerned, three studies are helpful.
Two, the Theodore Roosevelt navy ship, and the Diamond Princess cruise ship apparently involved universal testing.
On the Navy ship, there were 1156 cases and 1 death. IFR of less than .1%
On the cruise ship, there were 696 cases and 14 fatalities. IFR of around 2%.
Obvious difference is the sailors are largely healthy, younger people, while the average age of a cruise ship passenger may be above 65.
Iceland did not have universal testing, but tested a large part of the population. Total cases, 1900. Deaths, 10. But is very unlikely that Iceland, even with mass testing, caught anywhere close to all actual cases.
It goes on and on. Hundreds of positive tests in prisons and meat packing facilities, far less than 1% fatalities.
I think cruise ships are floating death traps,
I understand. thanks for the clarification. Whether the mandate is a good idea/necessary is certainly debatable. I think masks are a good idea. But I also agree that the "mandate" might not be the best way to get people who are less inclined to wear them, to wear them. The word out of the EKY counties who have some spread is that mask wearing has skyrocketed in those counties. Not because andy dandy said to wear them, but because people now recognize the risk.
the data issue is real. I don't want to "blame" anybody, but the federal government's lack of leadership on the issue is the cause. The federal government should have, in the begining, said, "here is how we are going to count cases" and laid out simple guidance on how to do so.
However, I don't think we should confuse what is going on. We have more of the virus in KY than we did previously. Is it a crisis? No. Should we take some precautions to try and keep it beat back? Absolutely. I don't disagree that Andy seems to be "getting off" on telling us how stupid we are and how we aren't doing enough.
His big test is going to be school. Teachers are going to freak out as school boards start saying that they are going back to school.
I am currently observing two mask mandates. One handed down by Governor DeWine which covers the county I live in. And one handed down by my employer which covers my workplace. Neither is a big deal.