Fine, tried to hack voting machines and may or may not have succeeded to various lengths and degrees.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...d975285475e_story.html?utm_term=.b9f111b02b68
Regardless, the point was that citizens knowing a candidate was the choice of Russian agents would have been a hard task to overcome.
I'm aware that we, in all of our benevolence, decide what's best for other countries all of the time, and sometimes even try and persuade our own people of that, but imagine Bush 41 finding out Dukakis had Russian agents acting on his behalf. He'd have landed 95% of the vote.
So I just find it weird that a president whose foray into politics featured so much questioning of Obama's birth and citizenship, and who is supported by such staunch national pride "patriots," could be knowingly supported by Russia and it not bother those voters.
I expect a certain level of hypocrisy and blindness in political allegiance, that one just surprised me.
Gonzo, You're forgetting that the bulk of the Russian story broke after the election. I think the whole Russian collusion story is fake, I saw the Dem pollster that original said it the day after wikileaks during the DNC convention. They were trying to get anything to stick that would distract from the actual leaks. It's why Obama admin didn't go hard after it until after the election. They were trying to weaken Trumps momentum.