I am not sure he would play over Billy Richmond next year anyways..If Edwards doesn't get drafted he'll transfer imo.
I am not sure he would play over Billy Richmond next year anyways..If Edwards doesn't get drafted he'll transfer imo.
Does not need to start. Start Dillingham or Reed or Burks.
This is a really dumb reason to not be starting one of our best lineups.No No No. keep bringing them off the bench They almost always provide a spark for our team.
Not sure the obsession with "who" starts. The lineup is working and Edwards needs to continue to develop and Rob and Reed are killing it off of the bench. They are also getting minutes in the 30s while Justin is not.Does not need to start. Start Dillingham or Reed or Burks.
Don’t you think the beginning parts of each half matter? Why handicap yourself with poor starts game after game if you know how to fix it? Might not’ve mattered as much when we were playing mid major patsies, but that’s the sort of thing likely to bite us in the ass when things get serious in March.Not sure the obsession with "who" starts. The lineup is working and Edwards needs to continue to develop and Rob and Reed are killing it off of the bench. They are also getting minutes in the 30s while Justin is not.
i made the comment to my son watching the game that he is starting to get into BJ Boston territory with me. Enough said.Right now he is closer to Boston and Skal than being a good player.
The thing with Boston was, that team was so terrible we really had no choice but to keep putting him out there as a feature guy. This team, not so much.i made the comment to my son watching the game that he is starting to get into BJ Boston territory with me. Enough said.
I agree 100% Ive seen just about as much positive from Burks as I have Edwards. I think Burks is tougher and more hard nosed and if he sticks around will be a good player, much like Thiero.Can't do any worse.......missed layups, no rebounds, turn overs
Edwards gives the team nothing
My bad I totally misread your post. Sheesh.I'm not sure we're on the same page here. I said Edwards wasn't nearly as good as Tyty was, just made a comparison in their soft bodies and the fact that I think neither showed NBA ability in their freshman year.
He's more like Askew in terms of performance.The thing with Boston was, that team was so terrible we really had no choice but to keep putting him out there as a feature guy. This team, not so much.
He will get it in the NBA Developmenal league. I don’t think he stays for his Soph. year.Edwards is one of those guys if he stays 2-3 years he can reach his potential. He needs some polishing.
I'm not one that is obsessed with it. Right now, Thiero healthy adds more on the floor than Edwards.Not sure the obsession with "who" starts. The lineup is working and Edwards needs to continue to develop and Rob and Reed are killing it off of the bench. They are also getting minutes in the 30s while Justin is not.
That’s not what he said. In fact, he went out of his way to distinguish in all caps that TyTy was the “MUCH” better player.LOL Edwards is TyTy Washington now...hahahahahaha
No No No. keep bringing them off the bench They almost always provide a spark for our team.
This x 2. We are now in the second half of the season and playing against much harder conference opponents and in tough road game environments. It is not in question that we are digging ourselves out of a hole each game with JE in the starting lineup. At some point, it will become clear what Cal's priority is. Is it this guy's hurt feelings, promises, and/or coach inertia, or is it the team developing further and getting itself hardened for the tournament. Just like for Whitney, there comes a time when it's obvious the team must move on with maximum minutes to the players showing the most skill and passion. Life is hard, especially playing at the highest D1 level. The starting lineup at Kentucky is not a place to figure it out for long, It amazes me some of you all think of Kentucky Basketball like pee-wee football with participation trophies and juice boxes. There's a place for that, but it's not here.It was worth starting Edwards to see if a lightbulb clicked, but I think we’ve reached that limit. He’s not good. His not as in shape as the other players. His athleticism was either overblown or hindered by him not being in the best shape. He doesn’t have a feel. He even looks shorter than listed. He shouldn’t be getting more than 12 min maximum.
I mean…does he? High school tape aside, has he done anything this year that makes you feel he has enormous upside?Kid has a lot of upside hopefully his confidence will grow its all in his head
There is a reason, the boss wants to do it this way.This is a really dumb reason to not be starting one of our best lineups.
There’s no logical reason we need both of our stud guards coming off the bench, especially when one of our starting wings had been such a glaringly inferior weak link all season. Just one is enough to provide a “spark.”
He’s playing at Washington with Keion BrooksWell where is Wheeler now? I haven’t heard anything about him since he transfered. Maybe the criticism was overly harsh, probably was, but it was warranted imho.
Yeah I know but have you heard anything about him recently?He’s playing at Washington with Keion Brooks
That's a stupid reason. Cal implied a huge role to Edwards on the recruiting trail, and Cal is trying to get him going so he can be a OAD.There is a reason, the boss wants to do it this way.
Ironically, the more Cal plays Edwards, the further his draft stock falls. He’d be better off shutting it down or having one of those invisible injuries.That's a stupid reason. Cal implied a huge role to Edwards on the recruiting trail, and Cal is trying to get him going so he can be a OAD.
Edwards starting has nothing to do with tactics, strategy, or winning. It has everything to do with implied promises and present recruiting.
Neither of those are real reasons to start him anymore at this point. He's had his chance. 2 months and change is more than enough time to prove he deserves a starting spot.
You know, it only takes a few seconds to google info for yourself. This is how he’s doing:Yeah I know but have you heard anything about him recently?
Again, your opinion means jack squat and Cal has a lot more inner workings of the team than you or I. I’ll tell ya what’s stupid, some of you constantly whining and bickering about minutes and a lineup. Can’t ya just enjoy the ride and leave the coaching to the coaches. I’ve been very pleased with Cal this season. However I’ve not seen you contribute anything other than whining.That's a stupid reason. Cal implied a huge role to Edwards on the recruiting trail, and Cal is trying to get him going so he can be a OAD.
Edwards starting has nothing to do with tactics, strategy, or winning. It has everything to do with implied promises and present recruiting.
Neither of those are real reasons to start him anymore at this point. He's had his chance. 2 months and change is more than enough time to prove he deserves a starting spot.
I don't even bother reading your post when I know you're going to be in your irrational mode, which is usually determined within your first couple words of a response.Again, your opinion means jack squat and Cal has a lot more inner workings of the team than you or I. I’ll tell ya what’s stupid, some of you constantly whining and bickering about minutes and a lineup. Can’t ya just enjoy the ride and leave the coaching to the coaches. I’ve been very pleased with Cal this season. However I’ve not seen you contribute anything other than whining.
Burks???Does not need to start. Start Dillingham or Reed or Burks.
Why? He's still a kid...where's this guy unless he dosen't like playing and not being "the man."He's already 20 though. That's a problem.
We need Adu back,his being out is exposing Edwards BBall IQ.I think that's Edwards problem.Well no shit he needs to keep playing. There is talent there. He just doesn't need to be starting. He does nothing to help push out a lead, but he can do a lot to build the other teams lead.
I agree. I don't know who was responsible for it, but I thought the mix of minutes among all who played in the Mississippi State game was very good. Edwards started and had the second-least minutes for the game. IMHO, somebody did an excellent job of distributing the minutes in that game ... but I'm sure it wasn't CCC's doing.No No No. keep bringing them off the bench They almost always provide a spark for our team.