The difference in these two resumes is worth FIVE f*cking seed lines? Can anyone call Lunardi out on his biased BS?
DUKE (6 Seed Projected)
Record: 17-7 (getting blasted by 20 right now against Miami)
NET Ranking: 25
Q-1 Games: 2-7
Q-2 Games: 5-0
Q-3 Games: 2-0
Q-4 Games: 8-0
Best Win: #17 Miami (home)
(Their 2nd Q1 win is against Ohio State who has lost 9 of their last 10 games and I have no idea why the NET ranks them at 41).
Unranked Losses: Wake Forest, Clemson, Virginia Tech
Kentucky (11 Seed Projected)
Record: 16-7
NET Ranking: 31
Q-1 Games: 1-6
Q-2 Games: 6-0
Q-3 Games: 3-0
Q-4 Games: 6-1
Best Win: #5 Tennessee (away)
That difference in resume is worth 5 (FIVE) Seed Lines according to Joe Lunardi?!
Can anyone explain it??? We're "on the bubble" and they are battling to get a top-5 seed???
DUKE (6 Seed Projected)
Record: 17-7 (getting blasted by 20 right now against Miami)
NET Ranking: 25
Q-1 Games: 2-7
Q-2 Games: 5-0
Q-3 Games: 2-0
Q-4 Games: 8-0
Best Win: #17 Miami (home)
(Their 2nd Q1 win is against Ohio State who has lost 9 of their last 10 games and I have no idea why the NET ranks them at 41).
Unranked Losses: Wake Forest, Clemson, Virginia Tech
Kentucky (11 Seed Projected)
Record: 16-7
NET Ranking: 31
Q-1 Games: 1-6
Q-2 Games: 6-0
Q-3 Games: 3-0
Q-4 Games: 6-1
Best Win: #5 Tennessee (away)
That difference in resume is worth 5 (FIVE) Seed Lines according to Joe Lunardi?!
Can anyone explain it??? We're "on the bubble" and they are battling to get a top-5 seed???
Last edited: