You meant, net, (and what is your weird obsession of summing things up like that, like you have spoken and that's the last word on the subject?) Mconnell is a warmonger Rino.This article suggests the war's endgame is to a) let U's current offensive play out, and then b) reach territorial agreement of Russia getting "some" U land while U gets the security of fast track NATO membership.
"With support for the war against Russia waning in the U.S., the counteroffensive may define a new border."
"2023 will be the decisive year for the war—and that by the end of the year, support for a cease-fire as a prelude to negotiations will become too strong to resist, even if some Eastern European allies doubt the wisdom of this course. .... hard to believe that the coalition is prepared to maintain its current level of effort for a trench-warfare conflict lasting as long as World War I."
"The good news is that NATO is moving closer to agreement on such a security package as it prepares for its annual meeting next month. Although recent signals have been mixed, Mr. Biden may be open to the suggestion, promoted by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, that Ukraine could join NATO after the war without going through the lengthy and elaborate preparatory steps typically required of applicants. France, Germany and many Eastern European countries are also indicating they are open to this plan. Within this framework, it should be possible to work out the security guarantees that Ukraine would need before it joins NATO.
But why would Ukraine agree to arrangements that would probably mean the permanent loss of a substantial portion of its internationally recognized territory? The answer is U.S. domestic politics. At the beginning, support for Ukraine in the U.S. was strongly bipartisan. No longer. While Democrats continue to back current levels of assistance, the share of Republicans who believe that we are doing too much has risen steadily, from 9% in March 2022 to 44% today, according to Pew. Recently, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy rebuffed a plan backed by both Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell that would provide supplemental aid for Ukraine " Net, McCarthy is a warhawk rino, LOL.
"Now it’s clear that Europe must end at Ukraine’s border with Russia. For the peace of the world, the West must establish this border and defend it against future aggression from a nation that will never be European."
Opinion | Ukraine Could Be Forced to Compromise
With support for the war against Russia waning in the U.S., the counteroffensive may define a new border.www.wsj.com
You yourself just said Mccarthy rebuffed more money.
Huh? Are you daft?