Sorry; it was @Catemus who said Putin was sleeping with his wife or something. My bad.Huh? Maybe being clever isn't your strong suit.
Sorry; it was @Catemus who said Putin was sleeping with his wife or something. My bad.Huh? Maybe being clever isn't your strong suit.
How could we have forced peace?The last line is the hardest for you all to accept. I get it, he’s an asshole. But we don’t (and shouldn’t) build strategy on this.
We should have forced peace. Instead, we are rapidly losing the ability to shape whatever peace emerges. All over somebody else’s territory.
Nope, wrong again.Sorry; it was @Catemus who said Putin was sleeping with his wife or something. My bad.
If China stays out of it then Ukraine can drive Putin’s troops out of their country. If they decide to jump in then it becomes a much broader conflict with the possibility of western munitions vs. Chinese. The ante would definitely be upped and the stakes would go through the roof.I said from the outset that his goal was to take a corridor to link to Crimea. He has, and I’d be stunned if that area can be retaken by the Ukrainians alone. He’s sending signals today that he is ready for peace. That peace will either be brokered by China, or by the West.
What’s the alternative to drive him completely out? Short of NATO boots, there’s not one. Maybe in spring, Ukraine can drive them out but I doubt anybody would bet on it.
So, we’ve reached the point that myself and others predicted, not because we’re any smarter, but because it was the most obvious outcome.
Hmmmm.But, China is more powerful in the world because of this conflict. We are not.
I’ve never accused Putin of sleeping with my wife, but I swear I saw a smuck that looked just like him driving an Uber in E-Town, Sunday.Sorry; it was @Catemus who said Putin was sleeping with his wife or something. My bad.
China has expended a tremendous amount of their global image on the Ukraine war because they calculated a swift Russian victory resulting in the United States being forced to defending Europe and thus opening up their ambition to take Taiwan by 2027.I am not sure Ukraine can push Russia out. Not sure this administration believes that either.
But, China is more powerful in the world because of this conflict. We are not.
No, but its pretty close. Russian equipment is pretty awful. Their AK rifles are pretty good though. There's no waves and waves of t-14 modern battle tanks rolling into Ukraine. Or fleets upon fleets of SU-57s heading into Ukraine. Most of the bearded guys in the middle east use similar equipment to the Russian military in ukraine. T-72s (albeit import models) BMP1s, AK74s, BMDs, BTRs, etc.---
And that version will last about 15 minutes on today's battlefield....if that. These aren't bearded guys from the Middle East the Uks are going against.
Most of Chinas Tanks and APCS are based upon the T-72 and BMPs. They just stole the designs and ''improved them.'' They're copying our Navy and aircraft carriers too. Also their most advanced fighter the j20 is a hodgepodge of Russian and American stolen blueprints. The j-11 and j-16 are clearly ripoffs of older american F series fighter jets.Hmmmm.
I would say England and Israel and Japan are “partners” of the US on the level now claimed by Russia and China.
If one (or all) of our “partners” devoted 97% of their military to a bogged down war effort condemned by the entirety of Europe, how would this make us more powerful?
Most (perhaps all) of China’s major military assets are based on Russian technology or on actual purchase from Russia’s defense industries (jet engines, an entire Air Craft Carrier, etc.)
Seeing the Russian war machine humbled should do nothing for China, except expose it’s border with Russia to be of little threat.
Italy failed badly in WWII: no one has ever suggested Italy’s broadly exposed weakness and incompetence strengthened Italy’s partners, Germany and Japan.
Japan’s Prime Minister’s surprise trip to Ukraine may well be the most relevant moment of geopolitical change in the whole conflict.
Japan signaled Europe that it supports International Law outside of Japan’s region, and this should further encourage Europe to cast its support for Asian/Pacific peace and security (Taiwan). The same day Japan’s Prime Minister made his way to Europe in defense of Ukraine, German Luftwaffe jets were flying from an Australian airfield over the Pacific!
I did not say that, not even close. I said much of the western world tried diplomacy.You contend NATO (or the world, as you stated) presented a strong United front? Really. I find that interesting.
That's one opinion. China respects power, not withdrawal.I am not sure Ukraine can push Russia out. Not sure this administration believes that either.
But, China is more powerful in the world because of this conflict. We are not.
It’s not a partnership with Russia that makes China stronger in the world. China has avoided any great cost in this war. The US getting deeper and deeper in this conflict is a positive for China. China is learning a great deal.Hmmmm.
I would say England and Israel and Japan are “partners” of the US on the level now claimed by Russia and China.
If one (or all) of our “partners” devoted 97% of their military to a bogged down war effort condemned by the entirety of Europe, how would this make us more powerful?
Most (perhaps all) of China’s major military assets are based on Russian technology or on actual purchase from Russia’s defense industries (jet engines, an entire Air Craft Carrier, etc.)
Seeing the Russian war machine humbled should do nothing for China, except expose it’s border with Russia to be of little threat.
Italy failed badly in WWII: no one has ever suggested Italy’s broadly exposed weakness and incompetence strengthened Italy’s partners, Germany and Japan.
Japan’s Prime Minister’s surprise trip to Ukraine may well be the most relevant moment of geopolitical change in the whole conflict.
Japan signaled Europe that it supports International Law outside of Japan’s region, and this should further encourage Europe to cast its support for Asian/Pacific peace and security (Taiwan). The same day Japan’s Prime Minister made his way to Europe in defense of Ukraine, German Luftwaffe jets were flying from an Australian airfield over the Pacific!
Actually, BBG, when you questioned me, as if you could not understand my point, you suggested that NATO was, in fact, unified and made a concerted effort. Our own president asked Zelensky if he wanted a ride out of Ukraine because he thought Russia would shock and awe. The voices against Russia were tepid. In fact, sanctions did not result until Russia was well into Ukraine. The intelligence was bad and the effort, if you can call if that, to influence Russia was weak. After the war started, the administration acted as if Biden had made attempts behind the scenes to unify NATO prior to the invasion, but if he did, he failed. Only the Ukraine brought any kind of unity when it showed better than people predicted. Then, we finally leveled sanctions. We were late in our response to something Russia demonstrated would happen for weeks. The cost of amassing its military along the border was great. We all knew what was coming. But, the rhetoric was weak. NATO was weak. Who knows, maybe we wanted Russia to invade. I don’t know.I did not say that, not even close. I said much of the western world tried diplomacy.
Most of Chinas Tanks and APCS are based upon the T-72 and BMPs. They just stole the designs and ''improved them.'' They're copying our Navy and aircraft carriers too. Also their most advanced fighter the j20 is a hodgepodge of Russian and American stolen blueprints. The j-11 and j-16 are clearly ripoffs of older american F series fighter jets.
I remember watching a video on China by a US navy guy. He said they're copying our carrier tech but don't even understand it. They're just blindly copying it because daddy US is using it.Kind of like they copy cars. I’m thinking the originals are always going to be better than the copies.
You are completely out of your depth and don't have any idea what you are talking about.China has avoided any great cost in this war. The US getting deeper and deeper in this conflict is a positive for China. China is learning a great deal.
Then site any alliance where one party’s embarrassment/loss/defeat made the other party to the relationship stronger.The attempted analogy to WWII is meaningless and also scary.
Yea. WW3. WW3. WW3! Or.... brics has added several members. Saudi Arabia and Iran sign peace deal and are getting off the petrol dollar. China and Russia are signing a new and unprecedented co-op deal. While Europe is aligned against Russia, pretty much the rest of the world is staying out of it or passively supporting Russia/China. China's tech isn't just "old Russian" tech. China has been stealing our tech (and every other nato nations) for years now.... Nato is using Ukraine as a weapons testing area and it looks like China is going to get in on that game.Hmmmm.
I would say England and Israel and Japan are “partners” of the US on the level now claimed by Russia and China.
If one (or all) of our “partners” devoted 97% of their military to a bogged down war effort condemned by the entirety of Europe, how would this make us more powerful?
Most (perhaps all) of China’s major military assets are based on Russian technology or on actual purchase from Russia’s defense industries (jet engines, an entire Air Craft Carrier, etc.)
Seeing the Russian war machine humbled should do nothing for China, except expose it’s border with Russia to be of little threat.
Italy failed badly in WWII: no one has ever suggested Italy’s broadly exposed weakness and incompetence strengthened Italy’s partners, Germany and Japan.
Japan’s Prime Minister’s surprise trip to Ukraine may well be the most relevant moment of geopolitical change in the whole conflict.
Japan signaled Europe that it supports International Law outside of Japan’s region, and this should further encourage Europe to cast its support for Asian/Pacific peace and security (Taiwan). The same day Japan’s Prime Minister made his way to Europe in defense of Ukraine, German Luftwaffe jets were flying from an Australian airfield over the Pacific!
His photo op in Crimea went poorly. He was heckled, but worse, his appearance was off.Images of Putin gripping his chair
The worldwide banking industry has some concerns.The economy is collapsing and we have banks collapsing and over 160 banks in danger of failing.
Let’s see . . . we are broke, abandoned, doomed and damned? The world is abandoning the PetroDollar, most countries are supporting China/Russia, quietly, BRICS is strong and adding members, buuutThey know they are next on the globalist hit list. They aren't going to just sit by and let us take out everyone 1 by 1 and then be completely cut off from the rest of the world.
China will not tolerate a western influenced government in Moscow.This is fan fiction. You’re great at it.
Russia “should” pick a Western friendly leader? To the Russian mind, the West has pushed NATO into their sphere and represents a threat. That’s a fact. However illegal we consider the Ukrainian invasion, it really doesn’t matter. It’s how Russia perceives it. The hopes of a pro-Western leadership are nil.
I warned of this specifically last year. I said, specifically, that we risked driving Russia into China’s camp. Not exactly going out on a limb since any fool should have seen it. This week, the Chinese premier was in Moscow. Where we’ll be in another year remains to be seen but is not too hard to imagine. Thanks to sanctions, Russia is now supplying cheap energy to China; is there anybody willing to bet China won’t supply weapons to Russia?
All of this over a swath of Ukrainian dirt that has traded hands countless times, and will again.
Hhhhhhhmmmm. You want me to address your strawman argument? No, I will let you do that.Then site any alliance where one party’s embarrassment/loss/defeat made the other party to the relationship stronger.
Your point was not just that that America is in some way weakened, but that China is strengthened. The thought defies logic and is historically unsound.
Sorry to frighten you mentioning WWII. The analogy was to show the simple point that no member of an alliance has been strengthened by its partner’s defeat or embarrassment.
If mere mention of WWII is that frightening, choose any historical era of war you wish, the last two millennia, and I can make the same analogy.
Here’s one that will not make you take counsel of your fears: The Warsaw Pact was not strengthened by Russia’s embarrassment/defeat in Afghanistan; instead, the Soviets’ poor performance in the Afghanistan War laid the groundwork for the end of the Warsaw Pact.
You are right on one point: China is learning a lot. They see Asian power Japan fully supporting the defense of Democracy in Europe, and they now see NATO nations training along side our Asian friends in the Pacific.
---His photo op in Crimea went poorly. He was heckled, but worse, his appearance was off.
His face looked like a funeral director’s first attempt at a makeup job.
If you connect the dots, this is probably typical. Countries are doing business with Russia. Many have used third-party countries to conduct the business, but it is still happening.
I think a body language expert would say that Xi was acting like the daddy in the recorded meeting with Putin. Putin looked down most of the time while Xi literally looked down on his much smaller host with a wry smile of superiority in this video,That would certainly be their worst nightmare and that is a big reason why Xi is sticking with a losing hand when they have to know Russia will be defeated.
XI is not there to save Putin and he knows it. Xi is there to try to ensure a pro China Russia emerges from the defeat in Ukraine instead of a pro West Russia.
The stakes are huge no question about it.
The lack of coherence in support of the war has been hard to witness.It appears our intelligence misinformed what was being reported, that Ukraine would fall quickly to Russia. Then, it appears Ukraine represented some existential threat to global democracy. Then, it appears we must support Ukraine’s valiant efforts, because Putin won’t stop at Ukraine, as he showed with Crimea and Georgia, before, even though we knew then he wanted Ukraine and we did virtually nothing to stand in his way as he took those territories. Then, we were told that Ukraine is kicking Putin’s ass, demonstrating how weak Russia is (and, evidently, somehow, how weak China is, likewise - how one deduces that conclusion is beyond everyone’s pay grade), BUT we still need to worry about Putin’s thirst for more …
Wait, we laugh that Russia is uber weak, but still justify our position of fear?
To quote an advocate, “Hhhhmmm …”
Well, goose stepping isn’t popular among those who think for themselves. 😁The lack of coherence in support of the war has been hard to witness.