ADVERTISEMENT

The Ukraine war. (Yes, we'll mind our manners)

The same people that were saying Russia would be crazy to invade Ukraine, therefore wouldn't, are now saying Russia would be crazy to use nukes to defend themselves, therefore wouldn't.

No, there is absoultely no way you are going to be able to wage conventional war between NATO and Russia without it going nuclear. They aren't just going to take the L because they have families too.
 
I'm still waiting for the Warhawks to explain why the murderous, evil thug tyrant putin won't use nukes if he feels his reign is over and he is set for death by a war crimes tribunal.
Entropy already answered this a couple of pages back - what is the purpose of this question and why do you keep asking it over and over? The most likely scenario is the Oligarchs and/or FSB take him out before he gets a (hypothetical) chance to use nukes. Do you think the Oligarchs are happy right now with how much of their assets have been frozen and lost? In a poor corrupt society like Russia, money is a powerful force. Can’t predict the future, but Putin is on borrowed time.

Should we stop giving weapons to Taiwan because China might nuke us? Policy shouldn’t be driven by hypotheticals.
 
All that's predicated on the narrative that they are losing, will lose... that the Russian people and economy are suffering due to this war.

The Russian people support the war, are propagandized, and what's actually happening in their highest circles or minds of their oligarchs is unknowable. Most of them certainly believe that the west wants to destroy Russia; that's the mainstream (propagandized) opinion there.
 
It's the Republicans who have been most vocal about increasing the magnitude and urgency of support, against the current administration's preference for a slow-roll.
It's absolutely true there are still a few good Republicans left but they are a vanishing breed marked for extinction and will either not be present or be completely unwelcomed at the Trumplican Convention where the Ukraine bashing and Putin lovefest will be nauseating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catemus
Entropy already answered this a couple of pages back - what is the purpose of this question and why do you keep asking it over and over? The most likely scenario is the Oligarchs and/or FSB take him out before he gets a (hypothetical) chance to use nukes. Do you think the Oligarchs are happy right now with how much of their assets have been frozen and lost? In a poor corrupt society like Russia, money is a powerful force. Can’t predict the future, but Putin is on borrowed time.

Should we stop giving weapons to Taiwan because China might nuke us? Policy shouldn’t be driven by hypotheticals.


The “most likely” scenario is “the oligarchs” all band together and conspire to murder the leader of Russia, resulting in a power vacuum that would be filled by someone who would effectively surrender to the United States in such a way that all sanctions would be lifted on oligarch assets, because they aren’t making enough money selling their gas, steel, etc. to China and the other nations that don’t fully support the US?

All the while you warhawks are floating going to international court and forcing the confiscation of those same oligarch assets to fund the rebuild of Ukraine.
 
Why do the warhawks on this thread constantly use the word appeasement? Did Russia appease us by having minimal involvement against our illegal acts of aggression against Iraq, Serbia, and Libya? Are nations Mexico, Costa Rica, Nigeria, etc, etc, also appeasing Russia by not becoming involved anymore than they are? Exactly who ordained America that "big dog", anyway?
 
Entropy already answered this a couple of pages back - what is the purpose of this question and why do you keep asking it over and over? The most likely scenario is the Oligarchs and/or FSB take him out before he gets a (hypothetical) chance to use nukes. Do you think the Oligarchs are happy right now with how much of their assets have been frozen and lost? In a poor corrupt society like Russia, money is a powerful force. Can’t predict the future, but Putin is on borrowed time.

Should we stop giving weapons to Taiwan because China might nuke us? Policy shouldn’t be driven by hypotheticals.
Best hope that the FSB or the "Oligarchs" don't take him out. What some of you warhawks don't understand is that, unfortunately, there are more Russian grandstanding warhawks in the population and in the media and the government than there are here. The Putin to Hitler comparisons are absurd, but Bismarck might be a closer example. When he goes, the replacement is likely to be Kaiser Wilhelm II. It sure isn't likely to be Gorbachev or Yeltsin.
 
The “most likely” scenario is “the oligarchs” all band together and conspire to murder the leader of Russia, resulting in a power vacuum that would be filled by someone who would effectively surrender to the United States in such a way that all sanctions would be lifted on oligarch assets, because they aren’t making enough money selling their gas, steel, etc. to China and the other nations that don’t fully support the US?

All the while you warhawks are floating going to international court and forcing the confiscation of those same oligarch assets to fund the rebuild of Ukraine.
Why do you flower boys keep going to the extreme? There is one simple goal in this war, push Russia completely out of Ukraine.

You keep asking the same questions over and over. Yes, there will be war crimes trials because Putin has brutalized the population of a sovereign state. Yes, Russia will have to pay reparations. Yes, Ukraine can sue for frozen Russian assets wherever they are to pay back its allies for help during the war.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LOL_Man
Why do the warhawks on this thread constantly use the word appeasement? Did Russia appease us by having minimal involvement against our illegal acts of aggression against Iraq, Serbia, and Libya? Are nations Mexico, Costa Rica, Nigeria, etc, etc, also appeasing Russia by not becoming involved anymore than they are? Exactly who ordained America that "big dog", anyway?
These warhawks are trying to degrade us with the word “appeasement”. It’s a shot like calling people a pu$$y. The problem with these clowns is this. They want Israel to appease their neighbors. They were the idiots who cheered the foreign policy that transfered trillions in wealth to China. They want to appease Iran with a nuclear deal. They were fine with Kim jong Ill developing a nuclear program. Even here, these same people and yes they are a monolothic group without a doubt, were either incoherent when Russia took Crimea, they were apathetic or they voted for the powers who were the actual appeasers. I mean catemus and vhcat amongst others didn’t even understand what happened in 2014. They spent a day on the internet to brush up because of the severity of things now. Now they just mimic intel talking points that are parroted in the media. I mean even the same neocons were ok with Putin taking parts of Georgia without any reprocussions. But now after all the failed policies they call us appeasers. And yes we are talking about the same people in this thread. They carry water for the media, they follow whatever the policy is and don’t question it. You know who the neo cons are here and the libs. Both cut from the same cloth. Yeah let Putin take parts of Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine, then 10 years later call for war then say “now are the appeasers”. When was the appeasement uhh not now????? And let’s not forget they are fueled now bc of trump being a Putin shill. Let us not also forget that Ukraine today is the product of a western orchestrated coup to over turn a democratic election. The more I type I can’t believe the trajectory of their thinking!

There is no coherent strategy to deal with Russia. There are no words used like diplomacy. It’s lunacy out of control being led by an old demented feckless president who turned tail and gave Afghanistan back to islamists. All of the guys all in with ukraine. Who did they vote for? They are unabashed biden supporters. Biden the guy who didn’t want to go after bin laden. Didn’t want to kill him wanted to “appease” his Al qaeda and taliban buddies just like Afghanistan turnover. 🤣 this is real???
 
Bad situation setting up. Does Ukraine pull out or defend to the last man here:

 
But all the Warhawks in this thread keep saying Russia is losing!

What is this propaganda?

Must be lies!

Zelensky is like Thor, and katniss everdeen, and Harry Potter all rolled into one!

He cannot and will not lose!
Well aren’t you a prickly pear. Russia is losing. They’ve sacrificed tens of thousands of lives since May in the Battle of Bakhmut, nearly 10 months. The only importance that destroyed city holds is to Putin.

He would not allow forces to be redeployed to Kherson and the Russians got routed on the west bank side of the Dnipro River as they retreated towards Crimea. If they take Bakhmut, it’s a hollow victory considering the astounding losses they’ve suffered in lives and equipment there.

Keep throwing those daisies at the military equipment going to Ukraine, though.
 
The same people that were saying Russia would be crazy to invade Ukraine, therefore wouldn't, are now saying Russia would be crazy to use nukes to defend themselves, therefore wouldn't.
Who said they'd be crazy to do it? You?
 
All that's predicated on the narrative that they are losing, will lose... that the Russian people and economy are suffering due to this war.

The Russian people support the war, are propagandized, and what's actually happening in their highest circles or minds of their oligarchs is unknowable. Most of them certainly believe that the west wants to destroy Russia; that's the mainstream (propagandized) opinion there.
The Russia people support the war so much that 700K conscription age men have fled the country. Total population is only 140M.
 
The “most likely” scenario is “the oligarchs” all band together and conspire to murder the leader of Russia, resulting in a power vacuum that would be filled by someone who would effectively surrender to the United States in such a way that all sanctions would be lifted on oligarch assets, because they aren’t making enough money selling their gas, steel, etc. to China and the other nations that don’t fully support the US?

All the while you warhawks are floating going to international court and forcing the confiscation of those same oligarch assets to fund the rebuild of Ukraine.
It's hilarious how the Putin apologists continually claim those opposing him are warhawks. An oxymoron if there ever was one.
 
Why do the warhawks on this thread constantly use the word appeasement? Did Russia appease us by having minimal involvement against our illegal acts of aggression against Iraq, Serbia, and Libya? Are nations Mexico, Costa Rica, Nigeria, etc, etc, also appeasing Russia by not becoming involved anymore than they are? Exactly who ordained America that "big dog", anyway?
You're the only one I see using "appeasement".
 
Why do you flower boys keep going to the extreme? There is one simple goal in this war, push Russia completely out of Ukraine.

You keep asking the same questions over and over. Yes, there will be war crimes trials because Putin has brutalized the population of a sovereign state. Yes, Russia will have to pay reparations. Yes, Ukraine can sue for frozen Russian assets wherever they are to pay back its allies for help during the war.


You said “most likely” which is definitionally the extreme, you dunce.

So if the oligarchs don’t murder Putin, he’s going to be put on trial for war crimes. I suppose he’ll probably think that’s better than getting raped with a bayonet. I’m just glad you guys have come to the conclusion that Putin is an insane war criminal capable of committing atrocities, but Putin is a sane rational man who would face The Hague rather than use nukes.
 
Best hope that the FSB or the "Oligarchs" don't take him out. What some of you warhawks don't understand is that, unfortunately, there are more Russian grandstanding warhawks in the population and in the media and the government than there are here. The Putin to Hitler comparisons are absurd, but Bismarck might be a closer example. When he goes, the replacement is likely to be Kaiser Wilhelm II. It sure isn't likely to be Gorbachev or Yeltsin.
Wow, didn’t realize Putin was such a moderate voice of reason being that it was his decision and his alone that started the war. He’s very much a peace-loving stable genius!

“Grand-standing” being the key word^.
 
You said “most likely” which is definitionally the extreme, you dunce.

So if the oligarchs don’t murder Putin, he’s going to be put on trial for war crimes. I suppose he’ll probably think that’s better than getting raped with a bayonet. I’m just glad you guys have come to the conclusion that Putin is an insane war criminal capable of committing atrocities, but Putin is a sane rational man who would face The Hague rather than use nukes.
I don’t see “most likely” anywhere in my post, you infected pimple.

If he isn’t murdered by his own people then he will most certainly be charged with war crimes. Believe it or not but not all Russian military are like Putin, you and the alt-right.

They know right from wrong. They will come to see the Ukraine war as wrong and will either kill Putin or turn him over to The Hague. I hope it’s the second option.
 
I'm still waiting for the Warhawks to explain why the murderous, evil thug tyrant putin won't use nukes if he feels his reign is over and he is set for death by a war crimes tribunal.
He might, the people around him who would do the actual firing will not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catemus
The same people that were saying Russia would be crazy to invade Ukraine, therefore wouldn't, are now saying Russia would be crazy to use nukes to defend themselves, therefore wouldn't.

No, there is absoultely no way you are going to be able to wage conventional war between NATO and Russia without it going nuclear. They aren't just going to take the L because they have families too.
Now you're making things up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catemus
🖕Ukraine and the corrupt US government, and all of the warhawks.
I used this elsewhere recently but seems appropriate here now too.

cry-sad.gif
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT