Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OP eats, drinks, poops, smells, eat, thinks, hears and sees puke all the time. Never seen anyone posting here that is Infatuated with another teams players and ratface coach, and not be their number 1 fan. Come on Man. Are you Zipp?
This board will be in complete meltdown mode for at least 3 months.
Some Duke teams in the past has worried me. This one does not. They have no depth. Plus they don't have a player on their team over 6'7" that could play in the OVC. Some things worry me, this Duke team isn't one of them.
Elephants have a long noseWhat's your reaction?
They'll have the most NBA talent in college ball. They have the superstar factor with three top 5 picks and a future all-star in Barrett. They have a great coach. If Jones plays at an adequate level, they could advance far in the tournament.
All of that noted, how would you respond if they cut the nets down in April?
Basketball must be around the corner: the worrywarts, especially the ones about all things Duke, are back.
"If they couldn't win it last year, they won't win it this year" is one of the most illogical justifications imaginable. From the same crowd that accurately acknowledges that matchups are everything in the tournament, who's hot in March, "any given night" and so on .... last year has absolutely nothing to do with how well this team does this season, especially in March.
Jeez, more people are just here to argue with the OP than just answering his freaking question. It's really not that hard and it's a legit topic while things are slow.
Good point on their quality in the front court. But backcourt as well. The SG, PF and C positions will be underwhelming. Reddish can be the 2, but it's still out of position for him.. Zion and De Laurier? Problems if they play the 4 spot. And Bolden at Center is just underwhelming.
You can't win a title with just a PG, a few SFs and a weak Center. They just don't have the pieces for a "team" and they will be horrifically carved up on defense.
Who is their shooter?Few here even consider Duke winning it all as a real option. A preseason top 5 team with three top 5 picks and a hall of fame coach.
It's certainly a discussion people have avoided all summer and now into the fall. Isn't that precisely what elephant in the room means?
I think UK has more talent and a better shot at the title due to being a vastly more complete team. That said, what if Cal had K's roster? I think our fair fans would be looking at the roster for what it is: top-heavy and ultimately dependent on at least two role players stepping forward to cut down the nets. The chances of winning would come down to those guys fitting the 4-7 levels of production on the roster.
I'm merely saying it could happen. If K gets production from any two role players, they'll be in the discussion.
Duke has no Anthony Davis, and no returning players on the level of Lamb, Jones, and Miller. Also, I'll go ahead and say that I think their best 3 players are only slightly better than Kentucky's, and more than cancelled out by better balance, shooting, and depth.I hope your last point is right, but we really don't know how Duke will perform because there hasn't been a long list of rosters constructed the way they will be by which to judge such a team.
Many folks never thought a team filled with three freshmen starters and two sophomores could win it all until they did just that in 2012. Others said a team without consistent perimeter shooting couldn't win it all until UNC proved that theory wrong with their 2017 team.
I personally hope the Duke hype machine is to such a level that they have massive expectations to win it all, only to cave on the biggest stage in March.
Yeah and here begins the Puke threads. We gonna kick their butt and send them back home crying in their milk.Basketball must be around the corner: the worrywarts, especially the ones about all things Duke, are back.
Two answers:
1. I think there's a good chance K is done after this year. If Duke doesn't make a huge splash recruiting, I'm not sure he would want to spend his last few years trying to coach up the likes of Joey Baker. That would play a major factor in their seeding and perhaps even the level of impact the refs would play for Duke.
2. They have 3 of the top 5 picks. That's significant. Our fans are downplaying Duke's chances, but the reality is that their season comes down to the development of Jones, Bolden, O'Connell, and Baker. If two of those guys take a step forward, Duke is right there with UK and Kansas in March.
I’d take our team 10 out of 10 times over theirs. We have a total package this year, it will be special. Not sure how a true UK fan can have the team we do this year and dwell on a Duke team less talented top to bottom than they’ve had in years. All because of media hype. There is no elephant in the room if you don’t create one. You must live quite the glass half empty kinda life.
Agreed, some have totally forgotten 2010 and 2015. Those two seasons changed how I think with regards to UK basketball. The best team doesn't always win and I refuse to believe UK is going to win the title. It's just too random. One bad possession and you could lose. If '15 can lose then this team certainly can. Heck, we could be out by the sweet 16. It's happened to some really good KU, UNC, Duke and MSU teams, it can happen to us.By being upset over my question, some of them are essentially answering it.
Avoidance at all costs is the name of the game for some, which would make for a completely toxic setting here next year should Duke (or to a lesser extent, Kansas or even a school like Tennessee) win it all.
I'm not expecting a title this year. I think UK has the best shot at a championship, but I'm not expecting it.
You'd think that after 2015, our fans wouldn't make declarative statements such as "We'll kill Duke on Nov. 6th!"
So what happens if UK doesn't beat them in November or win the title in April? This type of thinking leaves no recourse and can ultimately lead to epic board meltdowns, of which we've had many in the past when some of these shortsighted fans refuse to even entertain other possibilities (I've been guilty as charged in the past, but I'm trying to reform my thoughts on that type of outlook).
They absolutely could win it all. They will get every advantage humanly possible. That's the whole thing in a nutshell. It's bullshit.
Edit: still don't believe they do, though. No post presence and no deadly shooters. No depth to speak of either.
Yeah, so many UK fans are way too quick to count duke out just because they have no depth and an odd makeup, but they are highly talented and they have a HOF coach. It's not like Shawn Miller is coaching the team.Agreed. I abhor Duke as much as the next guy but to think they have absolutely no legit shot at winning the title this year is a bit naive
Who is their shooter?
They have 3 small forwards, Bolden is terrible and Jones isnt great and is a freshman. At the top level, where we are, they aren't going to win with Purdue athleticism. I won't even get into K's inability to get OAD's to gel and play as a team. You're giving them too much credit just based on draft position.
By being upset over my question, some of them are essentially answering it.
Avoidance at all costs is the name of the game for some, which would make for a completely toxic setting here next year should Duke (or to a lesser extent, Kansas or even a school like Tennessee) win it all.
I'm not expecting a title this year. I think UK has the best shot at a championship, but I'm not expecting it.
You'd think that after 2015, our fans wouldn't make declarative statements such as "We'll kill Duke on Nov. 6th!"
So what happens if UK doesn't beat them in November or win the title in April? This type of thinking leaves no recourse and can ultimately lead to epic board meltdowns, of which we've had many in the past when some of these shortsighted fans refuse to even entertain other possibilities (I've been guilty as charged in the past, but I'm trying to reform my thoughts on that type of outlook).
Who is their shooter?
They have 3 small forwards, Bolden is terrible and Jones isnt great and is a freshman. At the top level, where we are, they aren't going to win with Purdue athleticism. I won't even get into K's inability to get OAD's to gel and play as a team. You're giving them too much credit just based on draft position.
Agreed. I abhor Duke as much as the next guy but to think they have absolutely no legit shot at winning the title this year is a bit naive
Not to be a smartazz but what if monkeys fly out of my butt? UNCheat was a very mature, experienced team. Duke doesn't have that benefit either. K has yet to succeed, in any real way, with a primarily OAD team. What makes you think that will magically change this year? K is who he is, he coaches how he coaches. I cant think of a single reason to think 3 sf oad's with drive and shoot mentalities, black holes with ball movement, will suddenly change into a well rounded team.UNC won it all with sub-par shooting in 2017. They were horrible all season, but made shots in the tournament (at an adequate level).
What if O'Connell or Jones become adequate shooters and allow Duke some semblance of spacing? Additionally, Reddish should hover around 33-36% on the season.
They're limited, but we're also projecting limitations on them that may or may not be there.
Not to be a smartazz but what if monkeys fly out of my butt? UNCheat was a very mature, experienced team. Duke doesn't have that benefit either. K has yet to succeed, in any real way, with a primarily OAD team. What makes you think that will magically change this year? K is who he is, he coaches how he coaches. I cant think of a single reason to think 3 sf oad's with drive and shoot mentalities, black holes with ball movement, will suddenly change into a well rounded team.
They will win a lot but come tournament time I dont see much chance for them to six straight. They have a poorly balanced team with no depth. Anyone can win and those 3 guys give them a decent chance but I just dont see it.I tend to agree with your point, but Duke has three individual players who can take over a game. That makes them a threat. We saw Oregon make a good run a few years ago with three NBA-level guys and they were a few rebounds away from facing Gonzaga in the title game.
We saw what happens when guys get hot in March (Napier, Kemba Walker, Glen Rice with Michigan, Manning with Kansas, etc.) Duke has the type of players who could put together a hot streak. If they get a favorable draw, they might only have to depend on that hot streak for a few games.
All that said, I'm not thinking in definitive terms here. All I'm asking is that our fans keep the door cracked for other realistic possibilities. Thinking in absolutes has devastated this message board in the past.
They do not in any way have the most NBA talent. They have the most top 10 draft potential but just barely as EJ , KJ are all top 10 possibilities as well. But Duke has 4 maybe 5 guys who have any shot at the NBA UK has 8-9 . Also DUke has no guards , no depth and no experience. Duke isn't even a top 5 team IMO. They ain't winning jack. They will lose in the elite 8 or sweet 16. Last years Duke team was better then this upcoming one .What's your reaction?
They'll have the most NBA talent in college ball. They have the superstar factor with three top 5 picks and a future all-star in Barrett. They have a great coach. If Jones plays at an adequate level, they could advance far in the tournament.
All of that noted, how would you respond if they cut the nets down in April?
You're a fair-minded poster, but I still think it's a tragic statement that you have to qualify your statement by saying how much you hate Duke. Anyone who has followed your posts would know your devotion to UK's program; and yet there are fans who would question that devotion because you even raise the possibility that Duke could win it all this year.