ADVERTISEMENT

The earth is a flat, non spinning realm, not a planet in an infinite universe

Is the Earth Flat or a Globe

  • Flat

    Votes: 10 10.3%
  • Globe

    Votes: 87 89.7%

  • Total voters
    97
Status
Not open for further replies.
until you prove the curve exists or that the earth is actually spinning. I have experimental data on my side, you have the word of dead and brainwashed scientists.
*You're

You don't have any experimental data at all. You have YouTube videos that for some reason we are supposed to take at face value despite the fact that it flies in the face of hundreds of years of actual scientists who are not trying to disprove anything, rather move society forward with their findings. Find me one (1) flat earth article from a respected scientific journal that even places the slightest doubt as to the spherical nature of the earth.

Also, it's strange that you've gone from "gee guys, I dunno but these videos are pretty interesting" in your first post to the point where you are claiming a worldwide conspiracy orchestrated by satan himself. Seems like you might be the brainwashed one.
 
Last edited:
Whether it was created by a deity or snapped into existence naturally on it's own, we can all agree there is a "thing" called the Earth that exists in some three (at least) dimensional "realm." We can surely also agree that the Earth -- as well as other "things" within this realm -- obeys certain physical laws/concepts which can be described mathematically. Just as 2+2 equals 4, one of these concepts is that, for a given volume, a sphere has the least surface area for any three-dimensional object (e.g. cube, cone, pyramid, PANCAKE, etc...).

Why does this matter? Because the only way for the Earth to be "flat" like a pancake (as you're implying) as opposed to "round" like a basketball, would have been for some deity to have suspended the physical laws that govern every other celestial body and made it flat. In other words, celestial bodies (and even earthly ones, like raindrops for instance) that develop "naturally" are spheroid because that's the shape which has the smallest surface area for their given volume.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wildcatadam6
Whether it was created by a deity or snapped into existence naturally on it's own, we can all agree there is a "thing" called the Earth that exists in some three (at least) dimensional "realm." We can surely also agree that the Earth -- as well as other "things" within this realm -- obeys certain physical laws/concepts which can be described mathematically. Just as 2+2 equals 4, one of these concepts is that, for a given volume, a sphere has the least surface area for any three-dimensional object (e.g. cube, cone, pyramid, PANCAKE, etc...).

Why does this matter? Because the only way for the Earth to be "flat" like a pancake (as you're implying) as opposed to "round" like a basketball, would have been for some deity to have suspended the physical laws that govern every other celestial body and made it flat. In other words, celestial bodies (and even earthly ones, like raindrops for instance) that develop "naturally" are spheroid because that's the shape which has the smallest surface area for their given volume.
You just proved the existence of God.

Because there is a flat earth------>God.

You hear that, Bill. We've done it!!! We didn't even have to buy fancy cameras/lasers/balloons.
 
Time to branch out. If out space existed it would be under a vacuum correct? You know what doesn't work in a vacuum, propulsion. If space existed no known method of propulsion works there.
Where TF have you heard that? This one is so damned easy to disprove. I've done it myself. Build a box out of plexi, connect a vacuum through a hole in the box, place a bottle rocket on a matchbox car and an electric starter to ignite the fuse, turn on the vacuum and ignite once you have a pure vacuum in the space. Matter of fact, I'll save you time, Mythbusters did it.

 
6f9feb69ed84c9ba402c1dd44109a2f4.gif
 
Let me guess, Bushy Beaver, you're letting this video form your opinion.



Yes, technically a fan can create thrust, even if it is minute, especially a fan that small. However, air is the fuel to create that thrust. What does a vacuum not have to create said vacuum? AIR, DIPSTICK! Basically you have fan blades just spinning in an airless chamber, this proves nothing, except that when idiots who don't know jack about science try to science, they just look like idiots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wildcatwelder
So you're telling me space ships aren't just using a bunch of Big Ass Fans to move around in space?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ky8335
That is only half of the video, in the other half he tries to light solid fuel with an oxidizer in the vacuum, no dice.

 
Is there a flaw in his calculations or reasoning?





If you find one mark the time and which video so we can discuss it.
 
That is only half of the video, in the other half he tries to light solid fuel with an oxidizer in the vacuum, no dice.

Because there is no oxygen in a vacuum, dipish! You do know that is what a vacuum is, right? Of course he can't like an oxidizer in an environment where none exists, you have to ignite internally so the fuel will burn, or in Earth's atmosphere where the reaction will continue in space. That's why you have to use an electric arc in the vacuum experiment I mentioned earlier, a flame can't exist in a vacuum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wildcatwelder
So does Kyrie Irving actually believe all this Youtube shit? I saw the headlines where he said something about a flat earth, and just dismissed it as him being an ignorant moron.

It's about 100 times worse if someone educated themself with Youtube videos, and isn't just an ignorant athlete who knew he'd always get by on his athletic abilities.
 
So does Kyrie Irving actually believe all this Youtube shit? I saw the headlines where he said something about a flat earth, and just dismissed it as him being an ignorant moron.

It's about 100 times worse if someone educated themself with Youtube videos, and isn't just an ignorant athlete who knew he'd always get by on his athletic abilities.

He has said in follow ups that he does.
 
So does Kyrie Irving actually believe all this Youtube shit? I saw the headlines where he said something about a flat earth, and just dismissed it as him being an ignorant moron.

It's about 100 times worse if someone educated themself with Youtube videos, and isn't just an ignorant athlete who knew he'd always get by on his athletic abilities.

And yet you've NEVER witnessed the curve for yourself, EVER.
 
Bushy Bill's jersey is in the rafters as greatest Paddock troll of all time. No flat-earther has ever been able to write as well and incite like this guy. I'm glad you guys kept it going for 7 pages, but I'm also a little disappointed. C'mon Paddock...
 
So please tell me why the VHF radio band is extremely limited in ship to ship communications but does not face the same limitation when communicating with an airplane or a satellite.

Also, why then can the HF frequency band go for thousands upon thousands of miles given the right conditions and VHF cannot?

It is okay, you can go back to the formulas I linked earlier if you need help.
 
Is there a flaw in his calculations or reasoning?





If you find one mark the time and which video so we can discuss it.
There is a flaw at around 3:15 in the second video when he is about to suck the air out of a bottle. He mistakenly states that you are pulling on the inside wall. That is not true and proves he has no idea what he is talking about. That's the only one I've clicked on so far and probably the only one I will. Did you know there are videos on YouTube of a chick with big tits who plays a guitar?
 
There is a flaw at around 3:15 in the second video when he is about to suck the air out of a bottle. He mistakenly states that you are pulling on the inside wall. That is not true and proves he has no idea what he is talking about. That's the only one I've clicked on so far and probably the only one I will. Did you know there are videos on YouTube of a chick with big tits who plays a guitar?

LOL wut
 
I thought you said we were going to discuss it? I have no need to watch any more of that kook than I did earlier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Willy4UK
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT