The earth is a flat, non spinning realm, not a planet in an infinite universe
- Thread starter Bushy Bill
- Start date
- Status
Maybe one of you boys over in the mountains can recreate this flat earth experiment.
Exactly what it sounds like. A star that wanders through the firmament. You have to get rid of the notion that stars are giant balls of burning gas millions of light years away, they are pockets of sound within the waters of the firmament that vibrate and cause light to be emitted. I have a video about it up already.
There are no planets, not even earth is a planet it's a realm. I don't know what shape stars are.
Exactly what it sounds like. A star that wanders through the firmament. You have to get rid of the notion that stars are giant balls of burning gas millions of light years away, they are pockets of sound within the waters of the firmament that vibrate and cause light to be emitted. I have a video about it up already.
There are no planets, not even earth is a planet it's a realm. I don't know what shape stars are.
So, what are black holes in this flat Earth theory? Are galaxies flat too? How do you explain a supernova? Are quasars stars that made too much noise? If stars are making sound, why can't we hear them? Why was the drill getting so hot if there is no liquid mantle or metal core underneath? If there's no spinning iron core, what makes Earth's magnetic field to shield us from solar radiation? And what's the deal with airline food?
Is it a coincidence that realm contains the word real in it?
I think not.
I think not.
Last edited:
Poor ol Hank is one of the dumbest people to ever hold high office, and that's saying something.
There is no outer space, everything in "outer space" is either locked in the firmament or theoretical anyway (see black holes).
Here is a pretty good conceptualization, I think you guys are ready for it now, although from what I have been studying the starts are most likely in the firmament not under it.
Bill, could you go more in depth on how the sun, moon, and stars are a time piece?
My power went out (I'm assuming from a disruption in the firmament) and I'm trying to reset the microwave clock.
My power went out (I'm assuming from a disruption in the firmament) and I'm trying to reset the microwave clock.
Can we dig to Sheol? What happens when we get there? To spirits fly out like in ghostbusters ?
![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
Russkies!!They really do think you guys are that stupid.
When you can't trust them, who can you trust?
Bill, that's who!!
I'll never lie to you. I may be proven wrong but I'll never lie to you, I'm just relaying what I believe the evidence is pointing to.
Oh, I know. I know.
Let's get to proving you right.
Where do we start? What sophisticated cameras/telescopes/binoculars, lasers and balloons should we start amassing for our scientific revolution?
How could NASA fake weightlessness for video footage you might ask, why magnetic levitation of course.
Did she misspeak or did NASA just accidentally admit that 'spacewalks' are performed in a pool.
Whoops, NASAs 4th wall exposed?
Gravity doesn't exist. Weight and density determine the buoyancy of any object trapped within a medium (like air).
Did she misspeak or did NASA just accidentally admit that 'spacewalks' are performed in a pool.
Whoops, NASAs 4th wall exposed?
Gravity doesn't exist. Weight and density determine the buoyancy of any object trapped within a medium (like air).
Last edited:
If we are supposed to believe your YouTube videos, then you can explain this one, and thousands other like it. I took the liberty of imposing a straight line on the screengrab. And before you claim 'fisheye lens' watch the video from the beginning.
If we are supposed to believe your YouTube videos, then you can explain this one, and thousands other like it. I took the liberty of imposing a straight line on the screengrab. And before you claim 'fisheye lens' watch the video from the beginning.
You're going to have to do better than that, from your own video when the horizon is in the upper half of the frame the forced curve is convex, however when the horizon is in the lower half of the frame the forced curve is concave and when the horizon is in the center of the frame (it's truest representation) it's flat.
Here's a primer on how fish eye lenses work for those of you who don't understand.
Well that makes absolutely no GD sense at all. You are just flat out ignorant or your troll game is getting worse. Time to tap out.
LOL, ok Mr. Smarty Pants. Watch my video, then re-watch yours and get back with me Jr.
That was the first video in this thread I watched simply because I was curious about a weather balloon going in to space.
The earth is round, so don't get me wrong, but I was thinking the same thing as he was when the horizon was going up and down in he frame. Specifically thought that was a poor video to use to prove the earth was round for that very reason.
Time to branch out. If out space existed it would be under a vacuum correct? You know what doesn't work in a vacuum, propulsion. If space existed no known method of propulsion works there.
OK. I want you, not a video, to explain the grand conspiracy. What common everyday people would stand to gain by creating fake videos that clearly show the curvature of the earth. Don't copy and paste someone else's nonsense.
Also, I'm not your Jr. I'm clearly your superior in every way imaginable.
Also explain what impersonally am
Seeing when I look through my neighbors 13" telescope and see mars, or Jupiter and
It's moons
More bottled up sound vibrations? Chuck berry stars?
Seeing when I look through my neighbors 13" telescope and see mars, or Jupiter and
It's moons
More bottled up sound vibrations? Chuck berry stars?
- Status
