Personally I'd look past his tournament shortcomings. You all love Cal. Well he's Calipari lite. Both are the very best recruiters and average coaches. I'd still love to have him when Cal leaves. If he can bring in that type of talent at Zona, which has been as bout as good as ours every year, then he would likely do even better here.
I'm pretty sure you all weren't calling him a bad coach when he was turning Xavier into a national contender. As a matter of fact, his situation reminds me so much of Cal at Memphis. Both recruited great but can't close the deal. The majority of UK fans bash both and say they'd never want them here, (for different reasons). But the truth is that if he came here and brought in the same type of classes that he has at Zona then all of you people dumping on him would be kissing his ass just like you do with Cal now.
A little different as Cal had shown at UMass he could get to a Final Four. Then did it again at Memphis. That program was dog crap at Memphis before he got there. They went 61-58 the previous four seasons before his arrival. It took him five years to become a legit contender but posted winning seasons every year. Then went to two Elite 8s, then a championship appearance and a Sweet 16 before signing with us.
None of Cal's teams were built like his Kentucky teams. He wasn't loaded with All-Americans. He usually had one stud and good players and role players surrounding them.
Two Final Fours while at a mid-major and being a shot away from a title is a whole lot better than what Sean Miller has done.
Last edited: