ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
The fact that it takes 30 years to execute a child murderer tells me all I need to know about the judiciary.
Some day go down the rabbit hole of the murder convictions overturned after being in prison for 10/20/30 years.

Scary stuff, easy to ignore when it’s not yourself,

I don’t want murdersrs on death row forever, but I don’t know what standard of guilt you can use to ensure you don’t hurriedly execute an innocent person.
 
Haven't seen @55wildcat in a couple days, guess he is no longer with us...hope he got his wish on where to put his ashes:


GmSG4OQWIAA4qp7
 
Some day go down the rabbit hole of the murder convictions overturned after being in prison for 10/20/30 years.

Scary stuff, easy to ignore when it’s not yourself,

I don’t want murdersrs on death row forever, but I don’t know what standard of guilt you can use to ensure you don’t hurriedly execute an innocent person.

Arizona Death Row

Well here's one where the murder was 23 years ago, the defendant clearly did it, the defendant is stating he wants to get the execution over with because he deserves it, and the courts are still freaking delaying it.
 
This is just stupidity. The judge is a federal judge. His order is legitimate, whether an appellate court deems it wrong or right. You're just lapping up the "activist judge" BS and this stuff about a supposed conflict of interest - it's catnip to you and your ilk. Trump has no business mobilizing his angry mob against the judicial branch. If he keeps it up, it will be something out of a third world dictatorship. But as I said, I don't think he's stupid enough to do that.

Lets reduce the activist judge discussion down to the judge that ordered usaid get their 2 billion dollars. His wife was the ceo of an organization directly funded by usaid grants. That issue was never disclosed to the parties.

Do you agree this constitutes a direct financial tie that requires the judge to recuse or at least requires the judge to disclose to the parties so they can request recusal?






Roberts and Barret are going to have to make a decision.... Either reign in the lower court judges or lose all faith in the judiciary. Most people don't trust the courts as it is but if they let this keep going you will see people just thumb their nose at the courts. They will dare Roberts to do something and there is nothing he can do. They let antifa types carry guns and protest outside of SC judges homes... nothing. They have catered to the far left for so long they forgot how much scarier the right is if we refuse to accept their authority.

I have no issue with a random federal district court judge making a bad ruling. That's baked into the cake because most judges at any level are either incompetent or borderline incompetent.

That said, there is zero authority that im aware of, either actual or via logic, that allows a district court judge to issue an order that has national reach. By the very appointment and creation of the judicial districts, its inherent their power reaches no further than their district. Otherwise the federal judiciary would've been set up without districts.

Secondly, trump and co need to be very careful attacking the entire judiciary because of some obviously corrupt judges. No need to throw an entire history of respect for the separation of powers into the trash especially when you clearly have other avenues of successfully challenging the ruling and their power.

One of those avenues includes tracking all the usaid money to their end sources, which will absolutely get all of these rogue judges. There is a very clear reason these cases are filed in front of them. Doge clearly has the ability to track it down, they just stopped for whatever reason after the initial layer of usaid corruption. This is the best method to root out these people for good.
 
Hate to go back to it, but I warned all this would happen when doge let usaid back up off the mat. They got their money back and its been the easily foreseeable onslaught ever since. Everything from lawfare, to doxxing, to organized violence; all usaid trademarks.

Wait till it gets warm again and it will be the massive protest shut down again of the country, just like afl-cio planned if trump won in 2020. Benz talks about that, with receipts in this stunning video

Now all that swamp draining momentum is gone and it will be a massive battle. Massive opportunity lost. Will turn out to probably be the biggest mistake of trump 2.0.

 
What little im reading of people's jfk files takes, i find the most interesting:

1) Israel involvement are the maybe the only redactions in the entire document. Many are speculating they did it, but i think its more complex than just that.

We know the cia started forever ago running its dirtiest ops through other countries so they could a) maintain deniability and b) avoid having to keep files on those activities. They still the exact same thing today.

So i think the cia enlisted israel to either provide intel, take the shots, and/or be backup in case shots missed.

2) this thread shows how the cia planned and actually executed a plan of setting up elaborate movie sets and filming movies to pretend certain things happened elsewhere that never happened at all.

In the example here, Hollywood movie industry people provided all the services, sets, etc to shoot a scandalous sexual encounter in Hollywood but make it look like it was a prominent Russian official and it happening in Moscow.

I was already skeptical of our trip to the moon but now i am pretty sure it was this exact same elaborate setup. We know for sure theyd do it to tarnish russian targets, so why wouldn't they do the same thing to promote us exceptionalism?

 
Lets reduce the activist judge discussion down to the judge that ordered usaid get their 2 billion dollars. His wife was the ceo of an organization directly funded by usaid grants. That issue was never disclosed to the parties.

Do you agree this constitutes a direct financial tie that requires the judge to recuse or at least requires the judge to disclose to the parties so they can request recusal?





I have no issue with a random federal district court judge making a bad ruling. That's baked into the cake because most judges at any level are either incompetent or borderline incompetent.

That said, there is zero authority that im aware of, either actual or via logic, that allows a district court judge to issue an order that has national reach. By the very appointment and creation of the judicial districts, its inherent their power reaches no further than their district. Otherwise the federal judiciary would've been set up without districts.

Secondly, trump and co need to be very careful attacking the entire judiciary because of some obviously corrupt judges. No need to throw an entire history of respect for the separation of powers into the trash especially when you clearly have other avenues of successfully challenging the ruling and their power.

One of those avenues includes tracking all the usaid money to their end sources, which will absolutely get all of these rogue judges. There is a very clear reason these cases are filed in front of them. Doge clearly has the ability to track it down, they just stopped for whatever reason after the initial layer of usaid corruption. This is the best method to root out these people for good.


Not only are the judges obviously conflicted. They’re doing bullshit like quoting Hamilton the musical and randomly looking up incorrect stats on the internet to include in their opinions.

They’ve made a mockery of our entire legal system.

I don’t know how you fix it at this point. No one will get impeached. No one will suffer any licensure consequences.
 
Also, since we’re playing this corrupt game, Trump should send the SEC after anyone and everyone who’s trying to destroy Tesla. Certainly anyone who is short and is supporting the terrorism.

They’re not even trying to hide the fact they think they’re going to be able to drive Tesla so low it will force a margin call and destroy Musk for trying to save America.

I’m fine if we use some of the DOGE savings to prop him up.
 
Not only are the judges obviously conflicted. They’re doing bullshit like quoting Hamilton the musical and randomly looking up incorrect stats on the internet to include in their opinions.

They’ve made a mockery of our entire legal system.

I don’t know how you fix it at this point. No one will get impeached. No one will suffer any licensure consequences.

You're exactly right. Nothing will happen. Theyre basically immune from recourse unless there is some very specific proof of corruption. Bad decisions, even many, isnt enough. Thats probably a good thing overall.

The only hope is doge gets back on tracking usaid money. If they don't, all the blustering is just political theater.
 
Bondi isn't doing a damn thing but going on TV and writing letters.
If you watch her when on tv or walking with the president, she seems to be enjoying the moment. Spotlight is all she is there for. Not indifferent to the way the Obama's acted when on camera. Many of these politicians and leaders either have no clue as what to do or they don't care and are just there for the ride.
 
So much for ending the Ukraine war in one day. What a joke of an administration.


30 minutes after Trump's powerful phone call and boot licking session.....
 
Hungary is trending in the right direction for sure, but they have their own version of lunatic, disrespectful libs.




It seems that those countries Poland, Hungary and a few others who were seemingly not as prevalent in the leadership role of Europe as the UK, Germany, and France are now starting to assert themselves to the forefront. The more the muslim world and leftists ideology takes over the latter mentioned countries, the more those who were not the leaders will flourish. The only movement those others who have embraced the leftist ideology and allowing immigration to take over is to fall.
 
The Bible doesn't change just because Israel does.

Exactly.

The Bible is what tells you that isn't the Israel of the Bible.

God still views the Jews as his chosen people.

God still views the descendants of Abraham through Jacob as His chosen people. If they repented of THEIR ways and returned to HIS ways, they "would be brought back into the land." "If they turned away" again, "they would be vomited out" of it.

The people living there have done neither, so what does that say? That's a legitimate question to me.

It's up to God who has control of the land at all times, and for His reasons alone. Glad I'm not the judge

I don't have to agree with Israel politically to still support them as an ally.

Exactly. Politically or religiously the two issues are separate for me. It may not be that way for others.
 
If you watch her when on tv or walking with the president, she seems to be enjoying the moment. Spotlight is all she is there for. Not indifferent to the way the Obama's acted when on camera. Many of these politicians and leaders either have no clue as what to do or they don't care and are just there for the ride.

Exactly my thoughts on it. Trophy AG...?
 
Exactly.

The Bible is what tells you that isn't the Israel of the Bible.



God still views the descendants of Abraham through Jacob as His chosen people. If they repented of THEIR ways and returned to HIS ways, they "would be brought back into the land." "If they turned away" again, "they would be vomited out" of it.

The people living there have done neither, so what does that say? That's a legitimate question to me.

It's up to God who has control of the land at all times, and for His reasons alone. Glad I'm not the judge



Exactly. Politically or religiously the two issues are separate for me. It may not be that way for others.
The Bible clearly states that God will save Israel in the Tribulation.
 




Roberts and Barret are going to have to make a decision....

Looks to me like they already have.

Either reign in the lower court judges or lose all faith in the judiciary. Most people don't trust the courts as it is but if they let this keep going you will see people just thumb their nose at the courts. They will dare Roberts to do something and there is nothing he can do. They let antifa types carry guns and protest outside of SC judges homes... nothing. They have catered to the far left for so long they forgot how much scarier the right is if we refuse to accept their authority.

The right is made up of law-abiding citizens. They don't fear people that sit there and take it, and unfortunately that's what the right has done and keeps doing. The ones that have done something, even if it's a minor thing, are sitting in prison or bankrupted for standing up.

I'd like to think we can change it, but our AG and executive branch are just doing photo ops on these issues. No idea when or if they'll get around to actually prosecuting the offenders destroying the country and its people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PhDcat2018
Her position does not allow immediate transparency. I am sure she is uncovering a helluva lot more than we will ever be aware of.

This is very valid. When the United States indicts someone, they have to try the case within 70 days unless the defense wants/agrees to a continuance. So the typical practice is to have your case literally ready for trial at the time the indictment is filed.

For whatever reason, she isnt giving me much confidence. However im still giving her the benefit of the doubt for a couple more months.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT