ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
What's not possible? Keeping the current payments and starting a new system? If so, I can agree to a point unless you can divert some of the money we currently spend on pork, the Ukraine laundering scheme, green new deal, and a myriad of other programs we could either dissolve or lesson the cost of.
If we go back to 2019 spending levels, we can not only fund SS but also pay off the national debt eventually.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JumperJack
The math doesn't seem feasible or fair. I only see two scenarios to even coming close to making this work for the next 50 years.

Scenario 1:
  • Boomers get their full SS benefits
  • Generations that come afterwards fund boomers, but their payout structure is significantly less
  • Eliminate ceiling for paying into SS
Scenario 2:
  • Immediately switch Boomers to means tested SS benefits (e.g., you only get full benefits if you need it and if you're worth millions you get nothing).
  • Generations that come afterwards are subject to same rules as boomers.
  • Eliminate ceiling for paying into SS
In either case, the younger generations aren't getting paid out like the older generations did (e.g., greatest generation).

in the second scenario, boomers would never go for it.

Boomers have significantly more wealth than those who are younger. Kind of effed up that the poor young are funding the rich old.
Again. You don't have to rip off people's money.

Just go back to 2019 spending levels and freeze it there for, say, 10 years. Maybe even five. SS is funded and the national debt gets a big dent in it.
 
Can you give me an example of how SS has been robbed, raped and pillaged? Be specific.

Yeah, Ye Ole SS payroll deductions are taken from employers and employees equally and put into the general fund via direct deposits from employers and withholding taxes on employees which are paid by the employer for the employee via payroll deductions. (Guess what comes out of that fund???) (Think where a grant of 5 million dollars comes from for a study for how moss grows on a rock but doesn't turn colors.) (Hint, that comes out of the general fund as well.) Do you even know what a business pays into SS, also what an employee pays into SS? Do you know the percentage?

Now go look up the GDP for "payroll" in this country. (That will give you an idea once you look up the proper percentage for SS taken away from the GDP. (What amount of money should be in the general fund now for SS IF it wasn't raped, robbed, and pillaged? (If you want me to take you down this rabbit hole I can but you'd need to make a good down payment on your bill owed to me. I do not work for free.

Gave you a slight taste of what you asked BY providing an example... Was VERY specific. Use your old calculator and figure somethings for yourself if you can afford yourself.... Not sure you can afford anymore lessons from me (This one was free.) but, who knows. I hope you are very well off....

Now........... IF SS truly had a "lock box" AND the money never was touched except for SS. There would be PLENTY of funds for the payee's who now are the recipients...

Please anyone, let me know if I wasn't specific enough... Thanks

Type me your follow-on questions... I will do this, just once...

giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
Here is an idea ... what about Byron Donald for Senate to replace Rubio.

And Ben Shapiro or Cahrlie Kirk for press secretary. They would never do it, but it would be interesting to watch!
Think I saw something the other day (maybe it was posted on here...can't remember) that Kirk is wanting to run for Governor in Arizona I believe it was.
 
The math doesn't seem feasible or fair. I only see two scenarios to even coming close to making this work for the next 50 years.

Scenario 1:
  • Boomers get their full SS benefits
  • Generations that come afterwards fund boomers, but their payout structure is significantly less
  • Eliminate ceiling for paying into SS
Scenario 2:
  • Immediately switch Boomers to means tested SS benefits (e.g., you only get full benefits if you need it and if you're worth millions you get nothing).
  • Generations that come afterwards are subject to same rules as boomers.
  • Eliminate ceiling for paying into SS
In either case, the younger generations aren't getting paid out like the older generations did (e.g., greatest generation).

in the second scenario, boomers would never go for it.

Boomers have significantly more wealth than those who are younger. Kind of effed up that the poor young are funding the rich old.
I don't see how boomers are considered rich though. Boomers may have more money simply by working more years and hopefully saving to that point which everyone can do. The younger ones will get that way when their time comes. However, I know more boomers who are just living on SS than not (yes anecdotal). Including those in my family except me (5 other siblings). Many of my friends too. The only saving grace for me is between Military retirement, Civil Service retirement, SS, and my 401K I am doing ok. Not rich, but comfortable.
 
The SS ponzi scheme mayh doesnt work out in the end. Esp when new benefits are added. There is an easier answer but i dont want to type it all into the phone. In (very) short, let ppl opt out. Their employer continues to pay the match and the employee keeps his 6.2%. That is a 6.2% raise right now. But do not come back 10 yrs from now expecting govt funded retirement.

I typed it for you... (Have an idea we be kin in an area of endeavor...)
 
The SS ponzi scheme mayh doesnt work out in the end. Esp when new benefits are added. There is an easier answer but i dont want to type it all into the phone. In (very) short, let ppl opt out. Their employer continues to pay the match and the employee keeps his 6.2%. That is a 6.2% raise right now. But do not come back 10 yrs from now expecting govt funded retirement.
Now that is the problem when you have young people entering the workforce. You give them 6.2% more money and they will not save it for the future. Problems is, we can say that they don't come back expecting government to help them later, but you and I both know the bleeding hearts club band will demand that we help these poor people out.
 
Now that is the problem when you have young people entering the workforce. You give them 6.2% more money and they will not save it for the future. Problems is, we can say that they don't come back expecting government to help them later, but you and I both know the bleeding hearts club band will demand that we help these poor people out.

Just create a "real" lock box... if it was done at inception, no issues...
 
So 50% of American seniors rely on SS to provide at least half of their income. Half of those people basically get all of their income from SS. So 25% of seniors have ZERO economic support outside of SS. What would you replace it with and how do you keep seniors from being on the street?
Phase it out gradually over many years essentially weaning the country to a point when people keep and invest the money they would otherwise have paid in SS taxes.

Is this a perfect solution? No. Will someone get screwed in the process? Probably. Will elected leaders ever have the wherewithal to actually carry out such a protracted process? Virtually impossible. But every Ponzi scheme must eventually fail one way or another.
 
Yeah, Ye Ole SS payroll deductions are taken from employers and employees equally and put into the general fund via direct deposits from employers and withholding taxes on employees which are paid by the employer for the employee via payroll deductions. (Guess what comes out of that fund???) (Think where a grant of 5 million dollars comes from for a study for how moss grows on a rock but doesn't turn colors.) (Hint, that comes out of the general fund as well.) Do you even know what a business pays into SS, also what an employee pays into SS? Do you know the percentage?

Now go look up the GDP for "payroll" in this country. (That will give you an idea once you look up the proper percentage for SS taken away from the GDP. (What amount of money should be in the general fund now for SS IF it wasn't raped, robbed, and pillaged? (If you want me to take you down this rabbit hole I can but you'd need to make a good down payment on your bill owed to me. I do not work for free.

Gave you a slight taste of what you asked BY providing an example... Was VERY specific. Use your old calculator and figure somethings for yourself if you can afford yourself.... Not sure you can afford anymore lessons from me (This one was free.) but, who knows. I hope you are very well off....

Now........... IF SS truly had a "lock box" AND the money never was touched except for SS. There would be PLENTY of funds for the payee's who now are the recipients...

Please anyone, let me know if I wasn't specific enough... Thanks

Type me your follow-on questions... I will do this, just once...

giphy.gif
That entire thing was idiotic drivel.
 
It is not what was implied. It is just simply expressing basic insight into MAGA. 100% MAGA does not mean you agree totally with everything he does, it simply means you agree with the concept and general idea of MAGA. Once again, it is just as simple as that. TDS keeps you and some others from getting on board simply because of a caustic kind of hate.
Nonsense. I agree with the concept. But as soon as I criticize say a cabinet pick like Gaetz, or criticize general high tariffs, oppose bringing back SALT deductions, or think Mitch has done some great things, I supposedly have TDS. MAGA has no room for nuance.
 
Nonsense. I agree with the concept. But as soon as I criticize say a cabinet pick like Gaetz, or criticize general high tariffs, oppose bringing back SALT deductions, or think Mitch has done some great things, I supposedly have TDS. MAGA has no room for nuance.
If you criticize high tariffs you are a Chinese traitor. Go shill for the Walton family on your own time.
 
The math doesn't seem feasible or fair. I only see two scenarios to even coming close to making this work for the next 50 years.

Scenario 1:
  • Boomers get their full SS benefits
  • Generations that come afterwards fund boomers, but their payout structure is significantly less
  • Eliminate ceiling for paying into SS
Scenario 2:
  • Immediately switch Boomers to means tested SS benefits (e.g., you only get full benefits if you need it and if you're worth millions you get nothing).
  • Generations that come afterwards are subject to same rules as boomers.
  • Eliminate ceiling for paying into SS
In either case, the younger generations aren't getting paid out like the older generations did (e.g., greatest generation).

in the second scenario, boomers would never go for it.

Boomers have significantly more wealth than those who are younger. Kind of effed up that the poor young are funding the rich old.
So you add 15% percent payroll tax to everyone making more than today's pay-in limits. LOL.

- Freeze benefits today for those over a certain income level.
- Raise SS benefits payout from 62/67 to 65/70. People are living way longer than when the plan was devised.
- Create individual accounts with your own pay-ins & allow investments within it. Will need to be a "take" for those that go on disability & minors benefits.
 
So you add 15% percent payroll tax to everyone making more than today's pay-in limits. LOL.

- Freeze benefits today for those over a certain income level.
- Raise SS benefits payout from 62/67 to 65/70. People are living way longer than when the plan was devised.
- Create individual accounts with your own pay-ins & allow investments within it. Will need to be a "take" for those that go on disability & minors benefits.
- Freeze benefits today for those over a certain income level.
- Agreed, but voters won't go for it

- Raise SS benefits payout from 62/67 to 65/70. People are living way longer than when the plan was devised.
- Agreed, but voters won't go for it

- Create individual accounts with your own pay-ins & allow investments within it. Will need to be a "take" for those that go on disability & minors benefits.
- This is the one I have the biggest issue with. Let's say I do my own thing and lose big. The government, given that people don't like to see old people whither and die on the street, will still come in and save me. So it represents a risk issue.
 
I don't see how boomers are considered rich though. Boomers may have more money simply by working more years and hopefully saving to that point which everyone can do. The younger ones will get that way when their time comes. However, I know more boomers who are just living on SS than not (yes anecdotal). Including those in my family except me (5 other siblings). Many of my friends too. The only saving grace for me is between Military retirement, Civil Service retirement, SS, and my 401K I am doing ok. Not rich, but comfortable.
Living on SS only is due to choices made much younger unless there were health issues. We Boomers are rich as a whole only in comparison to all other age groups. By far most aren't.
 
- This is the one I have the biggest issue with. Let's say I do my own thing and lose big. The government, given that people don't like to see old people whither and die on the street, will still come in and save me. So it represents a risk issue.
There would have to be an annuity portion to it to protect against your scenario.
 
- This is the one I have the biggest issue with. Let's say I do my own thing and lose big. The government, given that people don't like to see old people whither and die on the street, will still come in and save me. So it represents a risk issue.
You can't have it both ways. You cannot bitch about the oppression of big government and then totally depend upon big government to bail you out of a lifetime's worth of bad decisions. If you do your thing and "lose big", then you should pay for that. No one else should be burdened by your has been (haha).

If there was no "safety net", then people might grow the Funk up. But the safety net has turned into a hammock on the backs of the people that work.
 
Too many people rely on SS and unfortunately too many my age are counting on it when our time comes as well. Have been blessed to save a lot of
money but too many do not make much, have several mouths to feed, etc and can’t save especially in the high inflation world we live in right now. I have no clue what the solution is to keep it afloat other than massive cuts elsewhere. Politicians lifeline are entitlements. They are not going anywhere.
 
This was posted on Yahoo Finance this evening: If these tariffs are put in place, it will stress the economy, it seems to me, but I do not pretend to understand them. Will the affected countries place tariffs on what we export to them ??

Concern troll back for some more BS.

Go away. I can’t wait till we tariff the hell out of everyone. Save the fake outcries for your leftist comrades. We don’t care about your concerns in this thread. Get bent
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT