Maybe this guy will make ou feel better. Can't remember how accurate he was in '16 or '20, but unlike some pro-Trump videos, he's fact based and he's not pie in the sky. These two videos are part of a longer video (2+ hours) of a live feed today.Some of the X accounts I’m seeing today are sounding more bullish for Harris. People hedging the middle or are they anticipating more election “fortification”.
More often than not, this ONLY means a person is too limp-wristed to stand up for what they actually believe ... modern day liberalism.I am not a liberal or conservative, but a centrist independent
How is it that HIGH??
There are lawyers, poll watchers, officials, etc ... representing both sides. Yet another cross-check.
Being independent means I do not register with a party (never have) and do not vote in primaries.
Yes, Kamala, but I DEFINITELY wish there were better candidates on both sides ... that's for certain ... and most people I know feel the very same way. It seems like negative politics prevents really qualified people from being interested in serving as President. It is a shame.
I'm starting to believe our system has devolved where the most able and competent choose not to run ... in both parties !!
I hope I'm wrong about that ... of course.
He's on ignore but I can guess what it was about ... Ammo is precious these days. Neither Trump nor any other MAGA would think for a second to waste some on such an insignificant figure as Liz CheneyYou are a moron. If you are in combat and have a rifle and are engaging the enemy, chances are you are behind cover and looking either around or over your cover to where only your face is showing. You are absolutely one on the dumbest posters here. He is referencing having to face the enemy and making a point that if it were her that had to do it, she would not have put herself in that position. Meaning, that the "warhawk" would not have started the war. No wonder you are voting for the cackling hag, you are just as clueless as she is.
I'm fine with abortion limits that include the mother's health, rape and incest. Not my first choice but I can live with it.Stop supporting aborting every inconvenient child that comes along. Problem solved. Without allowing unvetted violent criminals from every country in Latin America into the US.
Sure, while your sick ilk continue pushing for unlimited abortions of Americans, and trying to confuse children into sex change sterilization.Thank an immigrant for your SS benefits 20 years from now.
Your cult has rotted your brain to the point you think it's perfectly ok for an ex President to use that vivid violent imagery in today's volatile political environment. Garbage for brains.Makes what okay. Saying a warhawk who sends my kid off to fight in a needless war would change her mind if she had to go fight and the enemies guns were pointed at her would think differently. 100% true. If our leaders had to fight rather than sit safely in DC there would not be any war. Your entire peacenik movement in the 60s would be saying hell yea. Now you embrace Liz Cheney. Your TDS has rotted your little brain.
Your cult has rotted your brain to the point you think it's perfectly ok for an ex President to use that vivid violent imagery in today's volatile political environment. Garbage for brains.
Your points are irrelevant. Nobody argues for a static climate. The worry about climate change is the worry that the demands of 8 billion people won't be met. The margins for an overcrowded world are thinner.A static climate is a dead planet.
Tell us what the ideal climate and atmosphere gas composition should be?
Funny how those pulling your pull string and telling you what propaganda to bleat, never tell you that.
They just peddle fear.
This is a chart of atmospheric CO2 levels over the last 65 million years.
X = Years (millions)
Y = CO2 atmospheric amounts (PPM)
Modern humans came on the scene somewhere around 2.5 million years ago.
So... Walz is using "gay" as a slur?
We were in line 2.5 hours yesterday here in Kentucky. One of our best friends was in line 3 hours today. Is that voter suppression or voter fear and indignation? The library we voted at had around 16 portable carrels for filling in your ballot and 2 scanners, and there was a very long ballot. We were pleased by the turnout mostly and heard only good natured joking about it among the people in line with us. And, as you might imagine, the line was dominated by olds. Since this is Kentucky and the site was used by right and left, who was being suppressed?
Since Biden apologized for that, who is saying it's good?Remember the rules folks...
Trump saying Liz might not be such war hawk if were had to go stand on the front line and face some gunfire = BAD
Biden saying Trump should be in the bullseyes right before and assassination attempt on Trump's life = GOOD
CNN is just pathetic...period.
Columnist Jonah Goldberg, who falsely claimed on CNN that Trump wanted to execute Cheney, has issued a 'correction' for spreading the false story.Goldberg, falsely claimed that Trump called for the execution of Liz Cheney on live TV.
"This morning on CNN I referred to Trump’s “rifles” quote as him advocating a 'firing squad' for Liz Cheney."
"I was wrong to say he was calling for a firing squad execution. After I said that, my co-panelist, Brad Todd made the case that I was wrong."
"I let my disgust at Trump’s comments get the better of me as this was the first time I’d heard them."'
Journalist' Aaron Rupar is also under fire for deceiving voters through his deceptively clipped video which has amassed 20M impressions.
I will confirm this one .You are in a cult and you do not even have a freaking clue.Cult denial
I voted here in Fayette County at a library and my experience was similar to yours. I was in line for almost 2 hours. Lots of people voting, efficiently-run by an excellent group of folks. Show ID, sign name, receive ballot, fill it out, scan it and leave. The line had grown substantially, I noticed as I left.We were in line 2.5 hours yesterday here in Kentucky. One of our best friends was in line 3 hours today. Is that voter suppression or voter fear and indignation? The library we voted at had around 16 portable carrels for filling in your ballot and 2 scanners, and there was a very long ballot. We were pleased by the turnout mostly and heard only good natured joking about it among the people in line with us. And, as you might imagine, the line was dominated by olds. Since this is Kentucky and the site was used by right and left, who was being suppressed?
Bucks County, Pennsylvania is about 50/50 red/blue. Whatever the conditions at the polls are, it effects both sides equally. Weird scenario for voter suppression.
Since Biden apologized for that, who is saying it's good?
Sure it matters. But the world - meaning the election - isn't perfect. Never has been, never will be. Be as POed as you like. So there are a few here & there as always. What Sam claims doesn't change a thing.Doesn’t make any difference how many. It matters that reports are there that it has in this election.Sam implied it can’t happen because Federal Law prevents it yet it does.
I voted here in Fayette County at a library and my experience was similar to yours. I was in line for almost 2 hours. Lots of people voting, efficiently-run by an excellent group of folks. Show ID, sign name, receive ballot, fill it out, scan it and leave. The line had grown substantially, I noticed as I left.
I suspect tomorrow, with more people off work, turnout will be even stronger.
So... Walz is using "gay" as a slur?
He said it. You showed the video where he said it.
Here is EXACTLY what he said..... "Elon... that gay guy" He's a F'ing idiot.
You do realize that chart also cuts off 200 million years ago where CO2 was 4 times present levels, correct? No one stated you wanted a static climate. But if the thesis is that climate change is somehow inherently nefarious, then one can deduct that lack of change is preferable. Invective? Ha, ok. You start the sophist parroting and I simply throw it back at you. Lastly, your camp starts from the premise that more CO2 is conveniently a direct result of industrialization (capitalism), when the chart I posted alone should at least entertain the concept that correlation does not equal causation. But no, you ignore the other "inconvenient truths" that don't fit your agenda. For all the prattling on about the science, I see a lot of religious-like conviction. Do you think devolving to a pre-industrialization society would help the spread of disease or quality of life? Do you think tornadoes in spring, hurricanes in the fall, flooding would suddenly reverse? I see you keep parroting the line that these things are somehow worse than some idealistic condition or time that you fail to pinpoint. But I have seen no objective data to support any of that. It's purely subjective conjecture and based on more fear mongering than facts.Your points are irrelevant. Nobody argues for a static climate. The worry about climate change is the worry that the demands of 8 billion people won't be met. The margins for an overcrowded world are thinner.
Your chart cuts off the interesting part. It leaves the impression that atmospheric c02 is still at pre-industrial levels. Instead we're at 422 ppm. About where it was 14 mya. Which we've achieved in around 200 years.
Homo sapiens came on the scene around 270,000 years ago. The first cities around 7000 years ago.
Çatalhöyük, for example. Abandoned due to overcrowding, infectious diseases, and environmental problems. Rain patterns probably. Rain patterns gets pinballed around due to AGW.
On another issue, do you want invective or a discussion? There's no point in invective. Nature don't care for it and neither do I.
I stated why there's concern: 8 billion people with smaller and smaller margins.You do realize that chart also cuts off 200 million years ago where CO2 was 4 times present levels, correct? No one stated you wanted a static climate. But if the thesis is that climate change is somehow inherently nefarious, then one can deduct that lack of change is preferable. Invective? Ha, ok. You start the sophist parroting and I simply throw it back at you. Lastly, your camp starts from the premise that more CO2 is conveniently a direct result of industrialization (capitalism), when the chart I posted alone should at least entertain the concept that correlation does not equal causation. But no, you ignore the other "inconvenient truths" that don't fit your agenda. For all the prattling on about the science, I see a lot of religious-like conviction. Do you think devolving to a pre-industrialization society would help the spread of disease or quality of life? Do you think tornadoes in spring, hurricanes in the fall, flooding would suddenly reverse? I see you keep parroting the line that these things are somehow worse than some idealistic condition or time that you fail to pinpoint. But I have seen no objective data to support any of that. It's purely subjective conjecture and based on more fear mongering than facts.
Which one was the president?
Just Dang......
Ok Red Hat boy.I will confirm this one .You are in a cult and you do not even have a freaking clue.