ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Doesn’t make any difference how many. It matters that reports are there that it has in this election.Sam implied it can’t happen because Federal Law prevents it yet it does.
Sure it matters. But the world - meaning the election - isn't perfect. Never has been, never will be. Be as POed as you like. So there are a few here & there as always. What Sam claims doesn't change a thing.

What do you propose doing about it? Shut the election down because of one illegal vote? If not, what?
 
  • Like
Reactions: sambowieshin
I voted here in Fayette County at a library and my experience was similar to yours. I was in line for almost 2 hours. Lots of people voting, efficiently-run by an excellent group of folks. Show ID, sign name, receive ballot, fill it out, scan it and leave. The line had grown substantially, I noticed as I left.
I suspect tomorrow, with more people off work, turnout will be even stronger.

Glad you voted for Kamala, you Anti-American traitor.
 
Your points are irrelevant. Nobody argues for a static climate. The worry about climate change is the worry that the demands of 8 billion people won't be met. The margins for an overcrowded world are thinner.

Your chart cuts off the interesting part. It leaves the impression that atmospheric c02 is still at pre-industrial levels. Instead we're at 422 ppm. About where it was 14 mya. Which we've achieved in around 200 years.

Homo sapiens came on the scene around 270,000 years ago. The first cities around 7000 years ago.
Çatalhöyük, for example. Abandoned due to overcrowding, infectious diseases, and environmental problems. Rain patterns probably. Rain patterns gets pinballed around due to AGW.

On another issue, do you want invective or a discussion? There's no point in invective. Nature don't care for it and neither do I.
You do realize that chart also cuts off 200 million years ago where CO2 was 4 times present levels, correct? No one stated you wanted a static climate. But if the thesis is that climate change is somehow inherently nefarious, then one can deduct that lack of change is preferable. Invective? Ha, ok. You start the sophist parroting and I simply throw it back at you. Lastly, your camp starts from the premise that more CO2 is conveniently a direct result of industrialization (capitalism), when the chart I posted alone should at least entertain the concept that correlation does not equal causation. But no, you ignore the other "inconvenient truths" that don't fit your agenda. For all the prattling on about the science, I see a lot of religious-like conviction. Do you think devolving to a pre-industrialization society would help the spread of disease or quality of life? Do you think tornadoes in spring, hurricanes in the fall, flooding would suddenly reverse? I see you keep parroting the line that these things are somehow worse than some idealistic condition or time that you fail to pinpoint. But I have seen no objective data to support any of that. It's purely subjective conjecture and based on more fear mongering than facts.
 
You do realize that chart also cuts off 200 million years ago where CO2 was 4 times present levels, correct? No one stated you wanted a static climate. But if the thesis is that climate change is somehow inherently nefarious, then one can deduct that lack of change is preferable. Invective? Ha, ok. You start the sophist parroting and I simply throw it back at you. Lastly, your camp starts from the premise that more CO2 is conveniently a direct result of industrialization (capitalism), when the chart I posted alone should at least entertain the concept that correlation does not equal causation. But no, you ignore the other "inconvenient truths" that don't fit your agenda. For all the prattling on about the science, I see a lot of religious-like conviction. Do you think devolving to a pre-industrialization society would help the spread of disease or quality of life? Do you think tornadoes in spring, hurricanes in the fall, flooding would suddenly reverse? I see you keep parroting the line that these things are somehow worse than some idealistic condition or time that you fail to pinpoint. But I have seen no objective data to support any of that. It's purely subjective conjecture and based on more fear mongering than facts.
I stated why there's concern: 8 billion people with smaller and smaller margins.

You appear to have cobbled together your understanding of the science from non-scientific sources.

As for what evidence you've seen or haven't seen, the reality isn't going to change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GJNorman
AA1thGhg.img


Just Dang......
Which one was the president?
 
Kamala’s ENTIRE campaign platform continues to be nothing more than “Orange Man Bad.” She essentially never lays out anything to make her own case for the the presidency. This is a loser’s mentality. It is what someone does when they perceive their odds of winning are pretty long. It’s a last ditch desparate attempt to turn voters off to Trump, not to sell them on Kamala. There is a difference, and it is significant. Again, this is not the strategy of a winner, or frankly, of a leader, it you will. She’s not cut out for this.
 
More often than not, this ONLY means a person is too limp-wristed to stand up for what they actually believe ... modern day liberalism.

If I'm wrong ... simply prove I'm wrong.
It’s exactly what it is. We’ve seen this so many times on here owner the last decade.

Remember the guys who said they’d vote Kasich or Gary Johnson? 😂 They’re cowards. They come in and spew the left’s nonsense and then say “I’m not on the left” cause they see it as a shield from criticism.

You see a similar tactic of the left doing this by saying “Biden isn’t running” “he’s not on the ballot” when you point out their hypocrisy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BigBlueDave
Kamala’s ENTIRE campaign platform continues to be nothing more than “Orange Man Bad.” She essentially never lays out anything to make her own case for the the presidency. This is a loser’s mentality. It is what someone does when they perceive their odds of winning are pretty long. It’s a last ditch desparate attempt to turn voters off to Trump, not to sell them on Kamala. There is a difference, and it is significant. Again, this is not the strategy of a winner, or frankly, of a leader, it you will. She’s not cut out for this.
You’re certainly not wrong, but there are an incredible number of low information voters who are easily influenced by leftist propaganda.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeismaNole
I voted here in Fayette County at a library and my experience was similar to yours. I was in line for almost 2 hours. Lots of people voting, efficiently-run by an excellent group of folks. Show ID, sign name, receive ballot, fill it out, scan it and leave. The line had grown substantially, I noticed as I left.
I suspect tomorrow, with more people off work, turnout will be even stronger.
Oh my God, you had to show an ID? How did you survive this racist hate crime?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JumperJack
You’re certainly not wrong, but there are an incredible number of low information voters who are easily influenced by leftist propaganda.
This is true. I just find it interesting that her entire campaign approach is vilifying Trump. She spends zero time selling herself for President, which tells me she doesn’t really believe in herself. If you really believe you’re a great candidate, THAT’s what you lead with. That’s what you focus on in your messaging. But that’s now how she rolls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IdaCat
Jan 6th says hi insurrectionist. Kamala is 10 times the American Dump Truck Trump is. Kamala never turned on her country or led an attack on our US Capitol. 🤡

You better hope that your cheat machine wins: I have your posts screen shot. I will email Trump’s DOJ about you everyday until you are in prison. People like you need to be locked up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 55wildcat
Kamala’s ENTIRE campaign platform continues to be nothing more than “Orange Man Bad.” She essentially never lays out anything to make her own case for the the presidency. This is a loser’s mentality. It is what someone does when they perceive their odds of winning are pretty long. It’s a last ditch desparate attempt to turn voters off to Trump, not to sell them on Kamala. There is a difference, and it is significant. Again, this is not the strategy of a winner, or frankly, of a leader, it you will. She’s not cut out for this.

The "no policy" gag gets repeated every 4 years. They even accused HRC of not having policy. Except for her encyclopedia of policy suggestions.

The "no policy" gag is just nonsense.
 
Of course not. The 9 enemies with rifles pointed at her face were playing tag. Everybody knows that.

Trump doesn't even have courage enough to own his insults.
This is an individual that dislikes Trump and is campaigning for Harris that said this. Take it up with him.
 





Columnist Jonah Goldberg, who falsely claimed on CNN that Trump wanted to execute Cheney, has issued a 'correction' for spreading the false story.Goldberg, falsely claimed that Trump called for the execution of Liz Cheney on live TV.

"This morning on CNN I referred to Trump’s “rifles” quote as him advocating a 'firing squad' for Liz Cheney."

"I was wrong to say he was calling for a firing squad execution. After I said that, my co-panelist, Brad Todd made the case that I was wrong."

"I let my disgust at Trump’s comments get the better of me as this was the first time I’d heard them."'

Journalist' Aaron Rupar is also under fire for deceiving voters through his deceptively clipped video which has amassed 20M impressions.
It doesn’t matter this daily smash trump while Kamala talks it about it on the tarmac. It is having its desired impact. It’s a daily lie. Followed by Harris comments that take trumps out of context. Trump very well could lose because of the media people need to be prepared
 
Of course not. The 9 enemies with rifles pointed at her face were playing tag. Everybody knows that.

Trump doesn't even have courage enough to own his insults.
You are painfully stupid. Seriously, how do you not know that you’re a retarded simpleton?
 
I think the plan is just to muck it up so bad. Holding a losing hand and flipping the whole card table over.
Mike Benz on Poso today said that on of the plans they have is to claim the vote counting or disenfranchising was so bad they will appoint a nonpartisan group to recount the vote. Kamala is apparently having her election night party at Howard University and a group that is heavily involved in claiming voter suppression is being run out of their for democrats. Benz thinks they know they are losing and are going to try to win it in the courts. He's saying they send out the antifa and blm mobs to intimidate judges.... No matter who wins it's going to be a shit show for months.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT