ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Not only inflation, but many other factors....

GZ3pPreXMAAFgw0
All the people that voted or were voted for (for the first time) in 2020 because of being able to vote by mail due to Covid are NOT going to wait in line. They’re going to back to not voting.
 
For any NASCAR fans here.....





Like what the guy said who wrote the article.....

'Hilarious. Watching the lefty's melt because JD Vance was at the driver's meeting has been exactly as unhinged as I'd hoped when I heard he was gonna be there.

The most original response I've seen?
Keep politics out of NASCAR!

Yeah, OK! Sure. Easy. Literally every other sport is woke as hell and insufferable and displaying End Racism signs in the end zone like it's 1853, but NASCAR can't have JD Vance in the garage area before a race?'
 
Why would anyone watch? Anything relevant will be quoted on x within seconds.

You keep on watching vh. It fits your demo.





Baier will probably interrupt her… to call Arizona early.

Hell, it’s going to be pre-recorded.

Brett Baier loves him Kamala. So does Vh.

That guy brings nothing of value here. Just a waste of leftist pollution. Trying to sow division. It’s not working. The mind of a narcissist
 
For any NASCAR fans here.....





Like what the guy said who wrote the article.....

'Hilarious. Watching the lefty's melt because JD Vance was at the driver's meeting has been exactly as unhinged as I'd hoped when I heard he was gonna be there.

The most original response I've seen?
Keep politics out of NASCAR!

Yeah, OK! Sure. Easy. Literally every other sport is woke as hell and insufferable and displaying End Racism signs in the end zone like it's 1853, but NASCAR can't have JD Vance in the garage area before a race?'
Keep politics out of NASCAR?

Bubba Wallace on line 1...go ahead Bubba.
 
I have a general topic for discussion here.

Public "filming" videos are getting more and more common. Provocateurs, entering government buildings, and just passively filming government workers, and public patrons that are going to those buildings, to conduct business. Mundane tasks like renewing a car registration etc.

Personally, I'm fine with it. I can understand people saying, "they're only trying to get a reaction, and make some money on youtube etc." and they're correct. But whether or not you think it is annoying, they do serve ONE purpose; and that is to engage in their Consitutional right, and to demonstrate just how uninformed a LOT of society is, concerning what our rights actually are.

This extends to private businesses as well, to an extent. For instance; one of these "observers" was standing on a public sidewalk, outside of a private dispensary, and filming all of the patrons that went there. Including overtly filming license plates on cars in the parking lot (while staying on the public sidewalk), and that raised exponentially more ire, from both the employees, and the customers.

Given all of this. I'm wondering if, on election day; an "observer" stood inside a polling place (which is public for that day, even if it is in a privately owned building), and filmed everyone going in to vote, and exiting, would that be protected by the 1st Amendment?

My opinion? Absolutely.
 
I have a general topic for discussion here.

Public "filming" videos are getting more and more common. Provocateurs, entering government buildings, and just passively filming government workers, and public patrons that are going to those buildings, to conduct business. Mundane tasks like renewing a car registration etc.

Personally, I'm fine with it. I can understand people saying, "they're only trying to get a reaction, and make some money on youtube etc." and they're correct. But whether or not you think it is annoying, they do serve ONE purpose; and that is to engage in their Consitutional right, and to demonstrate just how uninformed a LOT of society is, concerning what our rights actually are.

This extends to private businesses as well, to an extent. For instance; one of these "observers" was standing on a public sidewalk, outside of a private dispensary, and filming all of the patrons that went there. Including overtly filming license plates on cars in the parking lot (while staying on the public sidewalk), and that raised exponentially more ire, from both the employees, and the customers.

Given all of this. I'm wondering if, on election day; an "observer" stood inside a polling place (which is public for that day, even if it is in a privately owned building), and filmed everyone going in to vote, and exiting, would that be protected by the 1st Amendment?

My opinion? Absolutely.
And if we do you will know the Democrat voters by their Covid masks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Girthang
🤣

Between this and Hillary saying we need to censor free speech, I am convinced that they don't want her to win and are trying to sabbatoge her. She doesn't want her to beat the guy she couldn't and be the first woman President. She can't fathom the thought.



"Cognitivity".. Yeah, he got it... Just enjoy watching President Trump skank those Communists... Ole Willey was just a socialist... but some socialists tire of stupid is as stupid is Laughmala... No way ANYONE can parade that around as presidential or even, heck, non-imbecilic...
 
NASA...just get out of the way of Space X and let those folks push Mankind further into space. It would save us a bunch of tax dollars and get it done sooner.

Space X with the catch...

Probably doesn't need to be said, but this could be applied in all but a very small set of circumstances.

ie. "government, please get out of the way, so that the adults can get to the task at hand. If you insist on observing, please do so from across the street, or at a location where you won't be in the way."
 
Probably doesn't need to be said, but this could be applied in all but a very small set of circumstances.

ie. "government, please get out of the way, so that the adults can get to the task at hand. If you insist on observing, please do so from across the street, or at a location where you won't be in the way."
What is "Inherently Government Functions" has become absurd.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT