ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
My wife and kid went to Wisconsin the other day to see her dad. She was born and raised there. They went into Milwaukee and Kenosha. Went to the 7 mile fair or whatever it's called. She said the cities are absolutely flooded with Mexicans. Like nothing she has ever seen. We went during covid 2020 and she went again 2 yrs later. Then now. Said it's unrecognizable from even a few yrs ago.

Rural Wisconsin, the entire rest of the state is as red as Alabama. Just the metro area that's been flooded with illegals that's changed.
 
Why? It’s unfathomable to think of someone other than yourself? Why’re you so attached to wealth after you die? You’re dead.
Are you going to turn away any inheritance from your parents? Do they have a will? Have you told them to turn your share over to the government to be redistributed? As if the government would even do that with it.
 
I am not thinking of myself, I am thinking of my family. I am working hard so my kids and their kids can see what hard work accomplishes and the opportunities that arise from being a hard worker. I want them to be able to enjoy after I pass the assets I created. How could you possibly think this way other than not being a hard worker yourself and not have any assets to pass along to your family.

Unfortunately, the people in power within your party will not give any of their assets to society without making sure their families get most if not all of their assets first.
If they think their Sociocommunism is going to be reliant upon people’s fortunes being surrendered to the state upon their death, then people will just be filtering their kids their inheritances to them before their deaths in the form of yearly gifts, but I guess Dion wants those banned too. Heaven forbid parents help their children.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AustinTXCat
That is 100% wrong according to many SCOTUS rulings. The constitution does not protect religous institutions. it only protects your right to religous beliefs and the freedom to religous practices. It is not an absolute statement thought. Only if those practices do not go against our laws. The only thing government cannot do is create a law that elevates one religion over another. The law against polygamy is a great example. It was a unamious decision that free exercise of religion has limits when it interferes with the law. They also ruled that it was legal to deny benefits for drug use even if a religion believed in its use. Reynolds vs US established that any part of religion can be banned if it violates health, safety, and morality. They said he was free to believe in polyagmy, just not allowed to practice it. The same goes for the civil rights and business. You are free to be a racist or bigot POS, just not allowed to openly practice it within a public business. Whether or not you agree with these ideas does not matter. SCOTUS has already ruled on it. And this was a long time ago, when the country was like 80% super stupid religous.

“To permit this would be to make the professed doctrines of religious belief superior to the law of the land, and in effect to permit every citizen to become a law unto himself. Government could exist only in name under such circumstances.”
GUi1hIpX0AAiFdc
 
  • Love
Reactions: Lost In FL
Exactly, in order to build wealth, you likely have to give up a lot of time with your family or take a lto of risk, and besides, it is YOURS. You should be able to decide what happens to it. But that time given up from the kids, this is part of the reason why ... so they can have a better life.

Dion said some bullshit earlier that he just wanted ppl to be happy or something. What if a person wants to leave all their assets to their children and that makes them happy? Why can't that be allowed? Because of lazy, greedy people that look just like econ dion.
Banning inheritance is a focal point of Dion’s dream world government. You think there is any way in hell that would ever in a million years be passed? Even the vast majority of Dims would say “yeah phuch that”. It would take an authoritarian act to put that in place.
 
Move the goalpost. You got owned man. You said one party would go all gangster if their man got elected. BlueRunner11 duly noted, "Gangster as in taking away the votes of the people? Trying to lock up and kill the political opponent?"

Which side is trying to lock up and kill their political opponent? Check out FL (federal), DC, GA, and NY for starters. All coordinated by Biden/Harris DoJ. Then get back to us... who is going gangster? Which side HAS ignored millions of voters?

Which side has gone gangster (already)?

Oh ... you're upset that citizens do not want non-citizens to vote. Yeah, solid argument. That's 2 L's for you today junior.
And don’t think for a minute that the Dem Globalist machine with the backing of Soros, Gates and the like don’t have the resources and plans in place to cause mass destruction, chaos and mayhem if Trump magically wins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
That is REALLY BAD. The crowd looks terrible, even for photoshop. Looks like a crowd when you go to buy concert tickets online. 100% fake.
It’s AI photoshopped. I’ve actually used the AI feature on some project renderings to wipe out some things in photos that block a view of a space I wNt to render. It gives you 3-4 options and puts out some goofy looking stuff, and sometimes you have to do 2-3 iterations to get what you want.
 
Democrats start every Presedential race with the dealer tossing them 3 aces, lol. smh

And remember everybody thought he was coocoo when he said Trump Plaza had been wiretapped and he was being spied on back in 2016. He knows what’s going on.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
I posted a laughing emoji on your post in her honor...and here's another one 🤣
Some accounts have been acting screwy and saying to confirm your email before letting you reply. You can only react to posts until you confirm. What’s the chances Stan forgot his email password because of all the sock accounts they have. lol
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Lost In FL
There were 2 issues. I answered the one about taking away votes. Arizona has passed a law to let them disregard the voters. Maybe you want to deny that or reply with an emoji.

As for killing Trump, that's just an accusation.

As for locking him up: you don't quit being a criminal by running for office. Grand juries indict people after evidence of their criminality has convinced them they've committed crimes.. Subsequently, Trump was convicted of 33 felonies. Not just indicted. Unanimous jury. Trump is just playing the victim card.

I love the idea that I'm a junior. To whom? Dick Van Dyke?
Which side has gone gangster junior? That was the "OG" question.

TRUMPed up charges? You know dam well they will be overturned on appeal. Everything about that trial was a show. And did you actually fall for it? Thought you were smarter than that.

Oh and a bullet swooned by his head. That is NOT an accusation. Why did that 20-year old loser have 3 phones and met regularly with the CIA? Stick your head in the sand or just parrot whatever propaganda they feed into you. Good grief.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trueblujr2
You obviously do not have children or any worthwhile assets. It’s my job and #1 goal to provide for my kids and my family. What I make and create in terms of assets I want to pass along to my family.

The taxes I pay should all be going to people like yourself that continue to polarize the hard working people who don’t use excuse after excuse to better themselves and expect others to take care of them. Instead, your party continues to send billions and billions to Ukraine while people like you need the help and handouts. But you want me to give more than the taxes I may to you while your government is sending money to Ukraine?

100 million % want my kids to have a better chance than others. This is life not a ribbon contest.
Like I said, you have no interest in equality of opportunity. To each his own, but don't act like you do you then. Nobles and serfs are justified to you as long as you and yours are the ones on top.
 
Would be great if he can snag VA. At least the election should be clean here.
You seem to be a proponent of Youngkin, correct? He has "clean" elections as you post here. So if Kamala wins VA are you going to accept that because elections under him are "clean"? Or not?
 
Are you going to turn away any inheritance from your parents? Do they have a will? Have you told them to turn your share over to the government to be redistributed? As if the government would even do that with it.
This is the old 'nobody's stopping you from paying 90% tax rate yourself right now, socialist!' argument. If I gave every penny I had to the government right now, inheritance and otherwise, nothing would change. One person doesn't do squat. Only works as a societal scale.
 
I can't believe that in the year 2024 we still have such uninformed people. In fact it's getting worse. I'm so tired of this. I feel like Howard Beale in Network, "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore".
It’s gotten worse because of the proliferation of 24/7 News at our fingertips all day every day through the multitude of media outlets and social media. It truly has morphed into one big psyop.
 
I understand how someone could look at 'no inheritance' from the context of our current society as insane. In our world where money is everything, why would you not want to help your DNA get ahead as much as possible? It's a biological imperative. You make enough, by whatever means necessary, and your progeny can live a fat and happy life above the trials and tribulations of the common folk. The American Dream of banishing nobility, that we're all equal in the eyes of our Creator(the universe), has been perverted into the American Nightmare. We didn't banish nobility at all, we just divorced it from the whims of the crown and delivered it into the hands of pure avarice. In America you just buy your way to lands and titles. The Great Gatsby. Excoriate us if you want, for having the audacity to imagine something greater. Like our Founders did. But don't fool yourself as to your own motivations. They are selfish. You would argue that's enlightened self-interest. So did the nobles, before they lost their heads. Y'all don't actually want a level playing field for all, just one for everyone else while you and yours stand ahead.
Lotta words that didn’t answer the question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
This is the old 'nobody's stopping you from paying 90% tax rate yourself right now, socialist!' argument. If I gave every penny I had to the government right now, inheritance and otherwise, nothing would change. One person doesn't do squat. Only works as a societal scale.
So no, not until everybody else does it first. You want to enact change? Be a trendsetter.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT