The retard left is out in full force right now. I swear most of them think the President has unlimited power, but was bound only by the threat of getting arrested. Losers.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
the funny thing is, my hyperbole comment had nothing to DO with the dissenting opinions.
While the lefties are raging about the ruling they don’t understand, the Biden admin is sending one of Trumps top political advisors to jail for refusing to comply with a House subpoena, while the Biden admin actively refuses to comply with House subpoenas.
Hyperbole. No, I meant LITERALLY everyone. The uncontacted Sentinelese were sitting around their campfires predicting SCOTUS outcomes.
Whether or not Biden gets replaced or not essentially comes down to Judge Merchan.
If there’s one thing this Roberts SCOTUS is known for, it’s issuing needless opinions on topics everyone already knows the answer to. Good call.
False. When you know as we do that all of these accusations are politically motivated then this ruling helps stave off the corrupt attempts at politically jailing the opposition. It is just your adherence to this third world communistic style of governance that shows what kind of evil and terrible person you are.
These are the same justices that attempt to uphold Roe for political and social reasons. Both published dissents are premised upon fear. Jackson claims that America has traditionally relied on the law to keep its presidents in line. Really?
These are the same politicals who suppressed a rape victim’s claims with regard to Bill Clinton. Do they want to see Biden charged with reckless homicide as it relates to the withdrawal from Afghanistan? Obama charged with killing citizens via drone attack without due process?
If you take off the partisan hat, wouldn't you want those things to happen? Just as a neutral American?
Show me that quote or you will be called a liar. Never mind...you lie at every turn. You must be a dim.
Last edited:
So, she is the SCOTUS all by herself? I still did not see the word "King" in there. Over dramatize with lies much? Yes, yes you do.
You didn't read the opinion tho, did you
You mean the same Sotomayer that said she can't sleep when a ruling does not go for the left? Hmmmm, sounds dictatorial to me.
You suck at this.
Let me put the partisan hat on so that I may take it off, as requested.
Okay, done.
No. Presidents have to make tough discretionary decisions while wielding their executive constitutional power and should not be motivated by how the next administration or some politically bent prosecutor is going to criminally charge them.
In fact, if you want me to agree with you about Biden and Obama, I have to wear a partisan hat.
Haha...you can't be this stupid.
BTW, didn't this case come about bc the current president prosecuted his political rival during an election year
Remember, that time @Dionysus444 hero FDR interned Japanese Americans...since we're talking about ppl playing king...yet you guys are believing a dissent where a lunatic talls about seal team 6 bc she must gather her legal knowledge from podcasts
And here's the obvious thing their brains cannot comprehend:
@sammysdad05 why isn't biden being prosecuted for murder and negligence for the death of US soldiers for the Afghan withdrawal.? You just said no immunity!!!!
Last edited:
The USSC ruling is one of those where when looked at in terms of the present conditions with Donald Trump that many on the right may celebrate, but where 10 years from now when a Democrat is in power and possibly nefarious that they will deeply regret. I don't see how it's a good thing for the country to admonish the actions of a President by simply deeming them as an "official" action.
Over the past 200+ years, we’ve never seen the type of lawfare being waged against political opponents as we’ve seen by the Biden admin. With the new, unprecedented targeting of political rivals, it’s important presidents are able to take the actions they feel are best for the country, without fear the next corrupt administration will imprison them.
Makes sense, coming from the "I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose voters, ok?" crowd.
I just thought the reaction was funny. We all should know by now even if the dems lose, it will be a tight one thanks to cheating.
If you think that an official act of presidency …
You who love to preach about the separation of powers when you think it serves your desired political end.
Let’s assume everything you typed is correct. You’re arguing that to let limit presidential powers, presidents must have unfettered power. This power does not just apply to the next president.
It’s completely contradictory.
LOL - “ten years from now” 🤪
Hilarious to see the outrage about trump getting the same absolute immunity as every other president. What did they think would happen?
This was only ever the correct application of law. However the real issues left to be decided: which of the complained acts are official acts?
This won't be the last time scotus sees this issue with trump imo.
This was only ever the correct application of law. However the real issues left to be decided: which of the complained acts are official acts?
This won't be the last time scotus sees this issue with trump imo.
Okay, assume it’s today. Away from being “cute”, Joe Biden now has ability to make any “official” decision or action w/ out accountability. It’s an indefensible ruling only supported because of litigation against Donald Trump. Very short sighted
The point is even Christians would be in agreement with not having people like shinsplints “teach” the Bible. The butchery of his out of context interpretation of the story of Lot is a great example of why.
The 10 Commandments on the other hand have significant historical value concerning US history.
Has nothing to do with “owning the libs” as much as you’d like for it to. You guys really aren’t that special.
Obama authorized the drone striking of many targets, including American citizens (without trial) in the name of protecting the US from terrorism.
I am fine with him not being charged with murder.
Impeachment is on the table - which would likely label any impeached action as (unofficial) - which then again puts a President in jeopardy for legal issues.
The panic from high ranking liberals is manufactured fear-mongering as they believe their supporters are ignorant.
I am fine with him not being charged with murder.
Impeachment is on the table - which would likely label any impeached action as (unofficial) - which then again puts a President in jeopardy for legal issues.
The panic from high ranking liberals is manufactured fear-mongering as they believe their supporters are ignorant.
Except that’s what happened with Lot so what’s the point? Again who is good enough to teach the Bible in public schools. Again, we’re talking public schools.
Do you think Trump should be able to have his DOJ and friendly courts imprison Joe Biden for his administrations criminal negligence at the border? (As an example)
There are plenty of things the Biden admin has done that are far less of a stretch to get to criminality than making a constitutional argument about electors.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
CBS: Justin Edwards 1st Top 3 Recruit Ever To Go Undrafted- Latest: Wildcats4ever2007
-
-
-
