Doesn’t Trump claim Obama is the real president behind the curtain?
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Doesn’t Trump claim Obama is the real president behind the curtain?
Fun fact: many folks invest in bonds for safety and income.
Under Biden, the ETF "AGG", which is a proxy for the bond market (it mimics the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index) is DOWN almost 14% under Biden regime. This doesn't even take into account the effect of inflation on purchasing power.
Imagine retiring in 2020... investing in bonds (or bond funds)... thinking you're safe... and losing 14% of your principal in less than 4 years.
Biden has been a DISASTER for conservative investors.
Under Biden, the ETF "AGG", which is a proxy for the bond market (it mimics the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index) is DOWN almost 14% under Biden regime. This doesn't even take into account the effect of inflation on purchasing power.
Imagine retiring in 2020... investing in bonds (or bond funds)... thinking you're safe... and losing 14% of your principal in less than 4 years.
Biden has been a DISASTER for conservative investors.
The difference is that the illegals that rape & murder are demoncrat voters. So it's OK what they do.
How many times have we seen a demoncrat standing before a congregation in a black church campaigning. The party that started the KKK, that voted against The Voting Rights Act, that believes that black are so inferior to whites that they have to be propped up with Affirmation Action. Yet demoncrats with their lack of shame are still going into black churches & doing this. So much for the separation of church & state.
If a person had been lost on a deserted island without any electricity for the last 10 years. This person wouldn't be any less informed than college kids are today. These are the low information, brainwashed voters that the demoncrat party depends on for their votes.
No. He knows exactly who the real current President is.
We’re gonna look back with shame one day at the treatment of some of these people.
He picks some very unnecessary, damaging fights. Just pure wag but wonder if youngkin refused an offer of vp? Would've been a great pick and help reel in a battleground state. Such a good decision would be unlike trump of the last few years, so who knows.
Guess I need to spam the hell outta this thread too.
SMFH
SMFH
This MFer is the perfect mascot for these TDS lunatics.
I mean, who COULDN'T see that the liberals on the SCOTUS would immediately become fascists and white supremacists the minute they made an obvious ruling?
And guess what, losers? They just destroyed the notion-UNANIMOUSLY- that J6 was anything more than a riot.
You'd think they'd have a modicum of critical thinking ability; with the 9-0 ruling, thye'd start to realize it's them that's the problem. The irrational, hysterical radical left is destroying this country and our democracy... this ruling gives me some hope.
Brassow, you gonna be able to pull the lever for Trump?
Austin said he likely will.
Vhnetcat is a never Trumper.
Not sure about bigblueinsanity. Never have asked him.
But I never got an answer from you. Are you a never Trumper?
Austin said he likely will.
Vhnetcat is a never Trumper.
Not sure about bigblueinsanity. Never have asked him.
But I never got an answer from you. Are you a never Trumper?
And not only that- Americans see that big 9-0 on the scoreboard and then wonder how in the world are all these other lawfare cases anything but illegitimate?
You wanted to suppress Trump instead of sell your own ideas and help America. Now you will reap what you’ve sown.
And last thought for the morning- consider what some of them are thinking now. If they couldn’t stop him with frivolous lawsuits, what do they use next? He better have great security.
You wanted to suppress Trump instead of sell your own ideas and help America. Now you will reap what you’ve sown.
And last thought for the morning- consider what some of them are thinking now. If they couldn’t stop him with frivolous lawsuits, what do they use next? He better have great security.
You people need to become like me, a maga ultra. 😇
It'll be a glorious American renaissance. Trump '24, VIvek '28
So why does he keep calling Biden Obama?? He does it ALL the time now. Dementia man 2.0.
Trump Confuses Biden With Obama, Again—Here Are 8 Other Recent Times
During a campaign rally Saturday night, Trump appeared to mix-up Obama with Biden, again.
www.forbes.com
'I'm leading Obama by a lot': Donald Trump appears to get his political rivals mixed up, warns of World War II
Speaking to religious leaders in Washington, the presumptive Republican nominee for next year's US presidential election questions Joe Biden's cognitive ability, but gets mixed up when talking about world wars and his political rivals.
www.abc.net.au
Does this ruling put an end to all the other loony leftist states doing the same?
I thought their ruling on student loan debt ended Biden's crusade to buy votes but we saw how that worked.
AG Garland pledges to fight voter ID laws, election integrity measures
Attorney General Merrick Garland pledged on Sunday to fight voter ID laws and other election integrity measures that he deemed “discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary."
Yep. She hauled in 1,200 votes in that behemoth of a primary. I am surprised that there are that many Repubs living in DC.
A Meat Shower could only happen in Bath County.
Meanwhile, back in the real world, Biden's war on Big Grocery proceeding according to plan and not helping matters any.. By the way, I've got a couple dogs in this fight.
Apparently, it is not up to States to decide eligibility under the 14th Amendment, Section 3, so no States will be making such determinations.
My understanding of the ruling is:
The Court held that “the Constitution makes Congress, rather than the States, responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates.” Accordingly, it remains to be seen whether Congress will take the issue up. That's how I interpret the ruling, but I am not a lawyer.
That is accurate. Courts often try to find a way to rule that does not require getting into the substantive issues. Here, the Court did not decide whether Trump committed insurrection or whether he had to be charged with/convicted of that crime to be ineligible. Instead, the court simply said that was an issue for Congress to decide, and not individual states. It seems sensible to me.
When this Court can come together and unanimously agree on anything, you know you must be a goddam idiot to be taking the other side of the issue.
Democrats are a threat to democracy, that’s for sure. Not even the lunatic lefties on the Court could sink to the level of this type of tyranny.
Democrats are a threat to democracy, that’s for sure. Not even the lunatic lefties on the Court could sink to the level of this type of tyranny.
They aren't responding because those are asinine questions that don't deserve a response.
Going easy on criminals is the Republican way.
I, not science dude, say you missed my point and science dude means nothing to me but is apparently big for and your buds here.
The left showing how much they despise scotus again...the racists are still trying to blame Clarence Thomas, even tho they can't bc it was 9-0
Hilarious they thought they could use the 14th amendment bc they can't read..it bars anyone convicted...Trump has never been convicted of anything
Hilarious they thought they could use the 14th amendment bc they can't read..it bars anyone convicted...Trump has never been convicted of anything
You got him this time! Walls are closing in!
