POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
I would disagree however that men grow better tits than women.
Is that a serious reply? Are you being sarcastic? When is the last time a GOP VP donated to the "pay their bail fund for violent criminals" like the current one does? How many GOP prosecutors does your boy Soros donate to?
Idk either but for someone of Trump's age and undoubtedly poor health, the VP is a blink away from being president. Even if trump wins and lives his term, can't imagine a second term. The GOP VP should have the leg up in that race.
All that assumes youngkin even qualifies. Not sure his age.
Edit - deleting my previous response to this post. I didn't catch the previous post that this was responding to, so I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt to Dion that he actually understands the SCOTUS ruling today.
It can't be said enough....9-0
Talk about serving your crow up on a platter.
Talk about serving your crow up on a platter.
And some people wonder why I am leaving Colorado this year. Throw in the utter mismanaged shit-show that Denver has become due to skyrocketing cost of living, war on fossil fuels industry which employs > 250k Coloradans, fentanyl overdoses, homelessness and now the hundreds of illegal immigrants stretching city services to the limit (causing some citizens to lose their jobs, BTW) and busting the city's budget and no one should question why I'm moving. Oh, yeah, wife has come to despise cold weather, so it's not ALL politics. I do love the mountains and skiing but the problems are mounting in this state and the above individual's statement is just indicative of one more example of a previously purple state (which I'm more than fine with) going bluer by the day.
pos turnip brain wouldn’t know an assault rifle from a salt shaker
🤬🤡
🤬🤡
Well Trump would be barred from a "second term" which would be a third term. Unless today's SCOTUS ruling means that Congress would have to bar him from a third term and he can get the Republicans in Congress to ignore the 22nd Amendment.
Lol says the guy that lays on the beach when states burn and eats ice cream
This would be the second term. There are no more for him. Perhaps I’m reading your post wrong.
More than anything, I’m wondering where his cult will turn next. I imagine wherever he he tells them as with governor and senate candidates. I doubt he’d leave his successor choice to anyone but himself.
There's a reason you asked the people you asked if they were voting for him...bc those are the ppl that aren't blindly partisan and can and do criticize him. So there is no fantasy.
Ever notice you guys always suddenly hate the ppl he turns on...usually even though they're ppl he hired, which he "only hires the best" and supported then claimed he didn't. How many times that gonna happen?
Tim Scott doesn't move the needle either way imo. With trump that might be as good as it gets. If late, he's as likely to pick Dr oz as anyone sensible. Major no fkr me on nikki
It's unsustainable and not close. No way anyone makes judgements so poor. It's intentional destruction of the country.
You just illustrated the problem. How does an outsider who wants to limit government do it without having people who understand government?
Folks, the enemy is the government.
Scott certainly has kissed Trumps a$$ enough to get it. Haley not quite so much.
Correct. I wasn't very clear. If he survived the term, whomever was his VP would/should have a leg up on the election for the next term. So imo it should be a very attractive opportunity. However it isn't because trump is so unlikely to win and he's much more likely to destroy the future of whomever is his VP.
In my opinion, Scott or Haley give Trump a better shot at a W.
Saw last week that one pundit speculated you may see Trumps Legion of Useful idiots going for Gaetz.
That will be interesting. I'd prefer to see RDS take another shot.
Is there a word for the opposite of assassination insurance? That’s Nikki Haley for Trump. He’d have to look over his shoulder with every policy decision.
Good points. Maybe Noem given she has government exec experience. But making sense doesn Cut it with him most often.
Yes exactly what I said is true. Congress and ONLY congress can pass legislation enforcing section 3 of the 14th.
Congress did so, and it chose to enact a criminal statute that bars anyone convicted under it from holding office.
Trump has not been charged or convicted under that statute.
End of story. Once again, the left hates the constitution, wants activists on the court, and has once again directed their racist ire towards only one justice
Noem might make a great choice.
Whomever he picks is going to be labeled as his Stalin to him being Hitler. I don't have any idea who moves the needle among independents.
But it doesn't matter imo. His biggest challenge is going to be mail ins, cheating etc. Trump would win 400 Electoral in a fair fight. If the RNC DOESNT FIGHT THE FIGHT NOW, they might as well pack it up and give up.
But it doesn't matter imo. His biggest challenge is going to be mail ins, cheating etc. Trump would win 400 Electoral in a fair fight. If the RNC DOESNT FIGHT THE FIGHT NOW, they might as well pack it up and give up.
Not talking about the ruling itself, Karl. Talking about the predictable reaction of lunatics like him.
As for insurrection: that is and was an OPINION held by people like yourself. Nothing more. Accept that. The fact that the SCOTUS didn’t address it doesn’t give it validity. They didn’t address the tooth fairy today, either.
We all know that this was an enormous win for Trump. Why? Because a regular person who doesn’t follow political intricacy will take away one thing from this- that he did nothing wrong.
Democrats, that’s how.
But it won't lead to 2/3 conviction in the senate. It won't matter how damning or compelling the evidence is, Dems will vote lockstep with each other. There is zero accountability in that party.And of course the republicans will cry about it
Chuck Schumer Will Kill Mayorkas’s Senate Trial to Hide the Truth | National Review
He is likely refusing to hold a public trial because he knows the charges against Secretary Mayorkas are compelling to the public, if not to two-thirds of senators.www.nationalreview.com
Comments are hard on Keith for mansplaining to women of color.
It should but the left no longer follows the law. A court ruled that the FBI wrongly seized Mike Lindells phone and ordered them to return it... The FBI said "no" and are refusing to follow the court ruling.
Not sure why you think his base can't criticize him for anything. Trump gets criticised on here by his supporters all the time. We criticise the fights he picks, the stupid things he pops off with at times, his spending was an issue, his handling of Covid, wasn't very popular, his Cabinet picks that sucked, Every one of us who either supports him now and supported him in the past have been able to point to his flaws.
Similar threads
