If you believe Trump is a true GOP candidate than you're an idiot. If you think he's funding this campaign with his own money and not taking donations (or other promises of future benefits) from elsewhere, you're an idiot.
If you believe Trump is a true GOP candidate than you're an idiot. If you think he's funding this campaign with his own money and not taking donations (or other promises of future benefits) from elsewhere, you're an idiot.
Hillary's inevitability sure is cracking.Well, two interesting stories tonight. First, the probe into Hilary's email shenanigans is now a criminal investigation, according to the NY Post. Second, a Senate Report says the IRS targeted conservative groups, and specifically targeted Bristol Palin, which was a well thought out plan.
So the Dems have a choice between a criminal and a socialist......
It sounds like the lefties have an estrogen problemNot really. They whine more and are kind of wimpy. As I said earlier, lefties piss and moan but eventually just kind of go away like the kid whose parents ignore their cries.
I prefer my angry political rants to be filled with full-on rage, a pinch of poor spelling and a dash of Jesus.
For example, I've seen a political argument or 20 in my day. Lefties go into pout mode and storm off like girls. Righties, get so mad they turn red, spit when they talk and in extreme circumstances threaten to fight and/ormake threats to shoot/kill their political adversaries. <---- That's the passion I'm looking for.
Like the people who voted for Obama, twice.and you are EXACTLY what he is counting on. uninformed people that vote according to sound bites
MOST of the people who voted for Obama did so simply because he was black. He was never veted and has been protected his entire Presidency by Harry Reid and the media...Just like they will vote for HC on being able to say they were part of history...She, like BO would be a disaster...Like the people who voted for Obama, twice.
I mean, it makes sense bc their policy stances have been so touching similar over the decades.
Well, two interesting stories tonight. First, the probe into Hilary's email shenanigans is now a criminal investigation, according to the NY Post. Second, a Senate Report says the IRS targeted conservative groups, and specifically targeted Bristol Palin, which was a well thought out plan.
So the Dems have a choice between a criminal and a socialist......
I'm convinced that Obama doesn't want Hillary to be the nominee.
I haven't seen any polls yet because I've taken a break from politics just to not be pissed off all the time but I think any candidate who did not go the PC route and do the same political rhetoric was going to be seen as favorable considering what we've been used to.
I still see no way he can win the nomination.
Disagree regarding Obama not wanting Clinton in. She may not be his favorite Democrat, but he certainly wants a Democrat to win, and she has by far the best chance. If an R gets in, there's the risk some/much of what he's done will be undone.
Saw this in the WSJ, has a ring of truth:
"The Democratic Party for much of the past 75 years did political blocking and tackling, too—and won many elections. But since 2008, it has succumbed to the Great Man theory of politics, which siphons all political life into one charismatic person. That began to fall apart for the Democrats in the 2010 midterms. In a Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll published this week, two-thirds say they now want a departure from the Obama presidency."
This generalization is not only racist, but stupid.MOST of the people who voted for Obama did so simply because he was black.
MOST of the people who voted for Obama did so simply because he was black.
I haven't seen any polls yet because I've taken a break from politics just to not be pissed off all the time but I think any candidate who did not go the PC route and do the same political rhetoric was going to be seen as favorable considering what we've been used to.
I still see no way he can win the nomination.
If Obama turns his back on Hillary, Bill will skewer Obama. Would be fun to watch.
That's about as informative, and unsurprising, as a dating profile saying "I like to have fun."
Obama is clever, and this is already being done in a stealth way IMO.
No it isn't . Go do your own research...not doing it for youThis generalization is not only racist, but stupid.
No...Mr. Carson is a Republican and an outcast...you insert the wording...sits on the wrong side of the issues. Believes in personal responsibility and not victimization. I would vote for him in a heartbeat.When I post with all caps, I usually have a source to back up my claims. Do you have a source for this? And if this is true, why isn't Ben Carson crushing the polls? Is it because the novelty is gone? But then that cuts against the "simply because he was black" argument. But let's go pre-BO. Jessie Jackson in the 1980s? Alan Keyes in 2000?
Obama received ~69m votes in 2008. Your theory is that > 34.5m people voted for him "simply because he was black." That's over 10% of the total US population (including children), and roughly 26% of all voteNors in 2008. That's a lot of people.
Hope and Change worked for Obama.
With regards to tonight, it will be interesting to see how Trump handles himself. If he's calm, insightful and Presidential, then he may be in this for the long term. If he turns this into a circus then he'll get all the attention, but people aren't going to vote for a clown.
If what you say is true then why is it that every time a black man or women on the right is nominated for something he/she is scorned by the naacp and the victimization crowd of the left as being a sellout. Are these folks not allowed to have different ideas...By the way isn't it great how all that liberal agenda has worked out for the black community?But if people are voting for the black candidate because he is black ("MOST of the people who voted for Obama did so simply because he was black"), that would apply to any black candidate (i.e. "simply because he was black"). So either your hypothesis is wrong or Ben Carson is not black.
Also, why would "sits on the wrong side of the issues" matter if people are voting "simply because he was black?" Beliefs/views/opinions/politics is simply irrelevant to > 34.5m people, no?
Yes...just like if you disagree with ANYTHING that the king says or does it makes yu a racist, right?...And I guess that dosen't happen either?This generalization is not only racist, but stupid.
If what you say is true then why is it that every time a black man or women on the right is nominated for something he/she is scorned by the naacp and the victimization crowd of the left as being a sellout. Are these folks not allowed to have different ideas...By the way isn't it great how all that liberal agenda has worked out for the black community?
Obama is clever, and this is already being done in a stealth way IMO.
Lotta truth to that. The bombshell news release of the home-brewed email system didn't come from a right wing conspiracy, or the tea party firebrand GOP House members, but the NY Times via (many thing) Valerie Jarrett.It's hard to manipulate what people are seeing with their eyes.
It sounds like the lefties have an estrogen problem
Honestly though, I wished somehow people could get past the left right bs and come to grip that both parties areProbably so.
And, some righties have a "tuff (sic) boy" problem.
It all depends on how you like your crazy.
EDIT: In fairness, I've lived in Kentucky my whole life. For every one lefty I've encountered, I've come across 25 righties. Therefore the conservative sample size is much larger, which gives them more opportunities to act like loons.
Well, two interesting stories tonight. First, the probe into Hilary's email shenanigans is now a criminal investigation, according to the NY Post. Second, a Senate Report says the IRS targeted conservative groups, and specifically targeted Bristol Palin, which was a well thought out plan.
So the Dems have a choice between a criminal and a socialist......
Not really. They whine more and are kind of wimpy. As I said earlier, lefties piss and moan but eventually just kind of go away like the kid whose parents ignore their cries.
I prefer my angry political rants to be filled with full-on rage, a pinch of poor spelling and a dash of Jesus.
For example, I've seen a political argument or 20 in my day. Lefties go into pout mode and storm off like girls. Righties, get so mad they turn red, spit when they talk and in extreme circumstances threaten to fight and/ormake threats to shoot/kill their political adversaries. <---- That's the passion I'm looking for.