Need to read up a little on how the middle class has done the last 6.5 years.The stock market has doubled since W's recession. Are you guys too proud to give the WH some credit?
Need to read up a little on how the middle class has done the last 6.5 years.The stock market has doubled since W's recession. Are you guys too proud to give the WH some credit?
Doesn't that work the other way?"OBAMA IS THE MOST UNQUALIFIED PRESIDENT IN HISTORY!!!!"
*pulls lever for Ben Carson*
They're pushing the Carbon tax because Americans are going to have electricity. Unless we start building a ton of Nuke plants, coal and gas are going to be the backbone of the load, or we're going to have rolling black outs.
It's a sure fire stream of money for the govt, and customers are going to pay it.
Wind just won't cut it during periods of high demand. I work at a gas turbine plant. Last week the wind power we get was at 12% capacity, 150 mega watts. That seems like a lot, but the demand was 29000 megawatts. That's literally a drop in the bucket.
If we really want to cut carbon the key is efficiency in everything we use it for. It's already making a difference. 10 years ago with the temps we had last week the power load would've been pushing 33000 mega watts. 4000 megawatts in coal power is roughly 48000 tons of coal a day.
The Hill @thehill 2h2 hours ago
Uproar after two illegal immigrants appointed to city commissions in California: http://hill.cm/04M8x3W
Speaking of CA, the (shopped) judge in NoCal that granted the stay on the PP videos bundled $250k for BO....lol, rascals.
The amount of energy consumption in this nation is nothing short of staggering. Theres a great need to be more efficient, but noones interested. California is especially ridiculous, yet theyre often the first to scream about conservation.
Your point about efficiency/conservation is correct, but a quick search shows that Californians consume the the 49th most energy per capita (out of 51 b/c D.C.). Not sure if this study factors in/accounts for weather (A/C and heating) and how/if it accounts for food consumption (NY resident eating California almonds counts as?), but interesting stuff. Of high population states, it's Texas that is the worst.
GOP has become...save a very few...a party of all bark and no bite.UCA was passed on cliches and fake narratives, NYT today:
WASHINGTON — Hoping to avoid another political uproar over theAffordable Care Act, the Obama administration is trying to persuade states to cut back big rate increases requested by many health insurance companies for 2016.
In calling for aggressive regulation of rates, federal officials are setting up a potential clash with insurers. Some carriers said they paid out more in claims than they collected in premiums last year, so they lost money on policies sold in the new public marketplaces. After finding that new customers were sicker than expected, some health plans have sought increases of 10 percent to 40 percent or more.
Administration officials have political and financial reasons for wanting to hold down premiums. Big rate increases could undermine public support for the health care law, provide ammunition to Republican critics of the measure and increase costs for some consumers and the federal government.
A checkbook (lol... I guess credit card statement and bank account statement) is a better indicator of what people care about than social media posts.
The amount of energy consumption in this nation is nothing short of staggering. Theres a great need to be more efficient, but noones interested. California is especially ridiculous, yet theyre often the first to scream about conservation.
I saw the story about the 2 illegals. Just ridiculous. And the judge who stopped release of additional PP videos should be ashamed of himself.
I would vote for him in the primary to ensure he gets the red team nod (I can't vote in either primary).
Because conservatives are already turnt up to 15 over them thurr gays, the rebel flag, the poors and the browns. I wanna see them get really f'n crazy and angry to the point the enraged caucasian can no longer be contained. (When whitey turns red)
The angry conservative is about the most entertaining thing on the planet if you're apolitical like me. The libs are too whiny and smarmy for my entertainment tastes. (It's like listening to your little brother whine over not getting a turn on the slide) They don't get frothing-at-the-mouth mad over every thing. The blue-teamers just blog about it with a typewriter ... ironically.
I like my pissed off rants with a heaping helping of poor spelling and grammar with a dash of religion thrown on top for good measure.
HOPE AND CHANGE BABY!!!... That's what we need more of. Fundamentally changing America...IMO The support for Trump is coming from a group of disenfranchised voters who do not like the direction either party has taken and are using Trump as a outlet to vent their frustration. By telling pollsters that their choice is Trump, they are essentially taking an opportunity to flash their middle finger at both parties.
But when push comes to shove are most of these people actually going to select Trump as the guy to set in the Oval office and make tough decisions? I mean other than "build the damn wall" and "I'll kick China's ass in trade" what serious policy positions has he put on the table? You can't manage the highest office in the land with sound bits. That won't get you much beyond the first day.
Viewed solely as a matter of qualifications to hold that office, as historically understood - that's really a who's the shortest midget in the room contest.......Obama might be a hair taller, he was a sitting Senator for all of about 12 hours before he began campaining for the Presidency. So we'll call it 3'9 vs 3'7........"OBAMA IS THE MOST UNQUALIFIED PRESIDENT IN HISTORY!!!!"
*pulls lever for Ben Carson*
Dunno about LA, but SF is probably way more efficient because (1) people live in multi-unit homes, (2) air conditioning isn't common. Those maritime climates on the west coast keep homes comfortable almost year-round.Interesting stat if true. I wonder if the desert regions of Cali drag down the numbers? Because we know LA and SF are energy gluttons.
The point is the hypocrisy and blind loyalty, not "Omg this means Obama was experienced".Viewed solely as a matter of qualifications to hold that office, as historically understood - that's really a who's the shortest midget in the room contest.......Obama might be a hair taller, he was a sitting Senator for all of about 12 hours before he began campaining for the Presidency. So we'll call it 3'9 vs 3'7........
The point is the hypocrisy and blind loyalty..
But the Republicans care right? They want the best for America. It's always been America first for them right?All the Democrats care about is getting another Democrat elected. To Hell with America!!!!! As long as the Democrat wins they don't care if their President gets BJs in the White House, or hides e-mails, or increases the cost of Healthcare 100%, or lies about terrorists attacks, or makes bad nuke deals with a country who says DEATH TO AMERICA,or allow millions of Illegal Aliens cross the border. Democrats do not care about any of this. Its all about getting their guy elected!! Sad!!!!
HOPE AND CHANGE BABY!!!... That's what we need more of. Fundamentally changing America...
I get your point... and you are correct... but... common sense no longer prevails or even matters in elections. We elect complete boobs based on skin color/white guilt/free stuff so why cant we act hypocritically and elect Ben Carson?lol'ed.
You're not serious, are you?
His stance on issues doesn't even matterI get your point... and you are correct... but... common sense no longer prevails or even matters in elections. We elect complete boobs based on skin color/white guilt/free stuff so why cant we act hypocritically and elect Ben Carson?
I mean, DONALD TRUMP is leading the Repub polls.
HILLARY CLINTON, with more baggage than any candidate EVER, is leading the Dems polls.
We are WAY past things like worrying about the hypocrisy of supporting an inexperienced candidate like Ben Carson while hating on Obama.
Dunno about LA, but SF is probably way more efficient because (1) people live in multi-unit homes, (2) air conditioning isn't common. Those maritime climates on the west coast keep homes comfortable almost year-round.
As Mark Twain (I think) said: "The coldest winter I ever survived was summer in San Francisco"
I mean, it makes sense bc their policy stances have been so touching similar over the decades.Told ya'll Trump was rubbing elbows with the Clintons.
Yeah, but you can't recoup energy prices via home appreciation.But the cost of rental housing is higher there than any place in America. So all that energy savings goes righ out the door to housing costs.
Well apparently he was 51yo, so prob just a garden variety psycho instead of a jihadiDid I miss anyone talking about the theater shooting in Nashville?
Yeah, but you can't recoup energy prices via home appreciation.
Well apparently he was 51yo, so prob just a garden variety psycho instead of a jihadi
No, but with people spending 50%+ of their pay on rent, you'd imagine SF folks would find nifty ways of being more earth friendly, which includes saving energy. Maybe they have to be more earth conservative.
And I don't know what to think about Donald Trump because I can't ever think of him as a serious person. The fact that he was involved with them and now is trying to get the GOP ticket makes me think he's in this whole thing for the Show.
I can see Trump pulling a WWE-like heel turn and once he gets in, hits some Cons with a chair and laughs, "Hahaha. I was a Dem the whole time" and buddies up with the Clintons as Fox News fades to black.
Just curious, but do you not find angry left wingers just as entertaining?Dump lump me in with Deee, brother.
I don't do the politics. I just think angry right-wingers are good entertainment because they get sooooooooo worked up over every thing.
GOOO RED TEAM!!!
I can see Trump pulling a WWE-like heel turn and once he gets in, hits some Cons with a chair and laughs, "Hahaha. I was a Dem the whole time" and buddies up with the Clintons as Fox News fades to black.
Just curious, but do you not find angry left wingers just as entertaining?